Found a Very Interesting Picture... Check It Out

Originally posted by 9Cib27
reply to post by Arrius

 

I was snooping on Google Images of random searches like: Pole Shift, March 15, Safe area map, Ect, Ect

I saved it because I figured it correlates with other "safe area maps" but upon a more detailed look I noticed it's authenticity and strange Volcano and water shed areas.

I am looking for the program that tells an image's origin. Can't remember the programs name

Google images doesn't guarantee the source. Anyone can (and everyone does) put their images there. Here. Here are two now.




Now I can re-upload them and make it look as if it's a 'military' map by putting USAF on the bottom too.

Okay OP. Thanks


But let's show how easy it is to obtain Google Images though.
Here's the link below with the key words: Pole Shift, March 15, Safe area map:
(just to be fair so people won't start freaking out)

www.google.com...

What's the area of possible volcanic activity that's circled in the lower right? Tennessee? Alabama? Can't tell.

reply to post by Human_Alien


I do see your posts a lot on ATS and I do know what kind of stance you're going to hold in this thread.

but again, like i said, if perhaps we could RESEARCH and then to decide wether believing or debunking is suitable.

No doomdays prediction
No soothesaying
Only metadata, examination, searches, ect.

reply to post by ~Lucidity


I'm thinking Tennessee .

Originally posted by 9Cib27
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

I do see your posts a lot on ATS and I do know what kind of stance you're going to hold in this thread.

but again, like i said, if perhaps we could RESEARCH and then to decide wether believing or debunking is suitable.

No doomdays prediction
No soothesaying
Only metadata, examination, searches, ect.

I'd be interested in knowing what you know of my stance.

One thing I am (and shoot me for this but) I am very pragmatic and logical when it comes to things. This is NOT against you OP, not at all, but the fact that you think it's worth taking time to research out a map that a 5th grader could've uploaded, is what I am questioning.

But then, on the flip side, if this WAS a military map (which I highly doubt it is) what are they basing this on? Remote viewing? A target? Calculations?
This is not to be sarcastic rather, an honest inquiry. Because as I see it now, unless a hurricane is modified (which I DO believe happens) they can't even project the correct landfall. So how would they project a coastline?
To me, it makes no sense.

Any by the way, I totally believe we might witness a PHYSICAL pole shift. Not that I am for it but, I do believe it's in the realm of possibilities based on Ancient theories and predictions

Looks like I just might have beach front property.


City          State             Rank           High Feet        Low Feet
New York       New York        1              410           Sea Level
Chicago         Illinois             2              673           1579
Los Angeles  California          3             5,074         Sea Level
Philadelphia   Pennsylvania     4             441            Sea Level
Houston       Texas              5             83              Sea Level
Detroit         Michigan           6             672            1575
Dallas          Texas               7             686            390

Great thread, very interesting, thanks.


Elevation Of U.S. Cities
Find Your Elevation

This is my search chain so far:

-Found image.
-Made out "AVHRR" on the image.
-Google searched AVHRR
-Discovered it's an extremely advanced satellite in use by NOAA
-Google searched "NOAA techtonic research" Since the image involves Techtonics.


Reading a couple links about San Andres fault specifically mentioning "chemically active".. Is that normal?

www.noaanews.noaa.gov...

reply to post by Human_Alien


What I know about your stance is that you're pragmatic and logical. (Sarcastic and cynical would be a guess.)

So again what I am trying to say is this image could be real or fake. I do not know.

So I am asking the ATS community to help me research if the NOAA or the AHRVV satellite internet searches may lead to information or the original link to the image. (clarifying it's origins)

Right now I am searching www.metacrawler.com
for the phrase: AVHRR tectonic progression

I found this link: www.isprs.org...

Still browsing around on it...

Also; Can anyone get this link to work: portal.acm.org... ?

...whats that possible volcanic activity circle in lower cali?... long valley caldera?... isnt it too far south?... am i not reading the map right?...

reply to post by okbmd

Yes...hard to tell without an overlay, but In the vicinity of the New Madrid fault, anyway.

Hello, Professor Faulken. Would you like, to play, a game?!

Originally posted by Golf66

Originally posted by SunnyDee
ok, spoke too soon. I can see this is a worst case scenario if techtonic plates change, and does not look good for anyone not above 4000 elevation in the US. Hope its very wrong.

edit on 12-2-2011 by SunnyDee because: (no reason given)

I've heard anywhere from 400-600 feet above sea level where did you get the 4k asl figure? That seems high...

My farm is at 761' asl in NW Missouri (hope I planned it right) and looking at the data should end up as prime beach front.

I was just guessing, I live at 3500feet in california, and know the area on that map, fairly well, it looks like parts of th local mountains remain in southern and central ca. I could be living on an island, what do you know!

Originally posted by 9Cib27
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

What I know about your stance is that you're pragmatic and logical. (Sarcastic and cynical would be a guess.)

So again what I am trying to say is this image could be real or fake. I do not know.

So I am asking the ATS community to help me research if the NOAA or the AHRVV satellite internet searches may lead to information or the original link to the image. (clarifying it's origins)

Fair enough but that is not the impression I got when I read your OP. It looked as if you already perhaps believed it and later, in subsequent posts, you wanted to research the source.

Sarcastic?..., yes! But really try not to be hurtful!
Cynical?... definitely! And I implore everyone to be that way from now on.

There is NOTHING and no ONE we can trust anymore. That's obvious.. But that doesn't mean I don't stay positive though because I do.
One doesn't erratic the other

reply to post by Wyn Hawks


I think that is where Long Valley would be, on this map.

OP, would this site/software help????

www.tineye.com...
Reverse Image Search

Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...whats that possible volcanic activity circle in lower cali?... long valley caldera?... isnt it too far south?... am i not reading the map right?...

It is too far south its centered over Coso Geothermal area.
www.geothermal.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

This would show as a hot spot from a satellite
www.docstoc.com...

Hope this is not a sign of new volcanic eruption as i live about 20 miles away

Originally posted by Human_Alien
OP, would this site/software help????

www.tineye.com...
Reverse Image Search

Yes, this is perfect.

Heres the search link:
www.tineye.com... -1.348350&m21=0.009101&m22=5.543340&m23=-5.760670&m11=5.543340&m12=-0.009101

Heres the thumbnail:
thm-a03.yimg.com...

This is the link, which of course, is broken:
montauktheend.com...

Creepy source though???

Why would that image be hosted on a website called "MontaukTheEnd"?? is NODE 14 important info?