It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dragonfly79
I think being gay has gone too far, people identifying themselves with their sexuality should say Hey I'm much more than my genitals or whatever I do with them, whoever I'm in love with doesn't define me....
Originally posted by NthOther
The real question is why government licenses are necessary in the first place. Marriage licenses, in the US, were originally intended to prevent interracial marriage. It had nothing to do with "sanctity". Once the government realized they could use it as a method of social control, they also saw they could make a lot of money charging fees for the licenses.
It's not really about who can get married and who can't--marriage is an abstract interpersonal commitment--it's about who can get a license to benefit from the legal jungle they've set up to regulate the transfer of property and the custody of children.
Simply put, the government has no legitimate business in defining or regulating interpersonal relationships whatsoever. Its motivation is nefarious at best, and downright evil at worst.
Originally posted by pirep
The main problem that is overlooked and will be front pages soon, is what happens when a gay couple want to get married in a church where they don't approve and refuse. Can they sue based on civil rights, etc. Then can government come in and regulate religion. just a thought.
Originally posted by manna2
oh hell no.
If they want the right to marry they have to go through the same things we have.
I feel they must be FORCED to marry pampered self absorbed pretentious American women just like the rest of us.
It's an equality issue.
Originally posted by CaptainEpic
Here in The Netherlands same sex marriage has been legal since 2001 iirc.
I don't see the problem some people have with gays etc. If your happy being gay, it's fine with me, just don't try and rub it in my face.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CaptainEpic
Here in The Netherlands same sex marriage has been legal since 2001 iirc.
I don't see the problem some people have with gays etc. If your happy being gay, it's fine with me, just don't try and rub it in my face.
Do you rub hetero in their face?
These kind of remarks are so uncalled for.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
Just look on this thread, the name-calling of anyone who disagrees with the gay agenda (bigot, brainless, religious zealot, fascists, hillbilly) just goes to show.
Gay people don't like me, don't like my kind, they want to marginalize me and my family and the things I value. So why should I support them and worry about whether they feel comfortable in society? They view me as the enemy.
I believe in tolerance for them. But not affirmation.
1. The power or capacity of an organism to tolerate unfavourable environmental conditions
2. A permissible difference; allowing some freedom to move within limits
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
It affects me when gays marry. Part of what gays do is sexualize the society. As a breeder in the 21st century, the first conversation you have with your kids about sex is about what GAY means.
Not about where babies come from, but why that man is talking funny or wearing women's clothing.
Politically, they demand more than tolerance. They demand approval from the rest of us.
That's my objection to gay marriage. I don't think they should be able to legally call themselves married, because it devalues marriage. It's like saying that anyone can now call themselves an accountant. If we all do that, then the definition of that group becomes so large and vague that it loses all meaning.
Gay people don't like me, don't like my kind, they want to marginalize me and my family and the things I value. So why should I support them and worry about whether they feel comfortable in society? They view me as the enemy.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I don't agree with that argument. I think heterosexuals have done far more damage to marriage than any other community has.
50% divorce rates in the richest countries is an indication that marriage isn't really taken seriously by anybody anymore
The argument should be about the government having no place in dictating what two responsible adults have the right to do, and not do in their bedroom or in regards to marriage.
The government decided a long time ago to make a religious practice a system of law, which affords more rights to those who hold that title than those that don't.
Because of this decision, they must afford everybody the chance to partake in these advantages so long as they are two consenting adults. Otherwise that is the basic definition of discrimination against a group of people.
As a gay man I respect the fact that you don't agree with homosexuals. That is your right as a human being. However it's another thing entirely for people to look down upon me or anybody else for something that is entirely outside of our control. I don't want to get into a choice argument here as that isn't the topic at hand.
The reality of the situation is that if you are not gay, then same sex marriage does not concern or affect you in any way, other than you might have to explain something to your children, which in all honesty should be nobody's problem but your own.