It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by youdidntseeme
reply to post by dr_strangecraft
Doc..
Do you tolerate or affirm the following:
All of the above at one time were argued by opponents using the same exact arguments that you are making. Many of these are now considered societal norms.
Just want to know where you draw the line.
Originally posted by doobydoll
Live and let live, that's what I say.
Same sex marriages dont hurt or affect anyone, so I dont see the problem.
Nothing much to add to that really
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by imjustlikeyou
The reason that it takes both sexes to make a child is because it takes both sexes to raise them successfully. Why ignore that fact.
(snip)
Yes - it takes two components to produce a child. There is nothing wrong with the reproductive system of gays. They are attracted to the same sex - - that's all. Many gays have produced offspring with women. However TODAY - - in this modern Open world - - gays can live their lives as God made them. They don't have to pretend to be who they are not. Just like straight couples who can not conceive - - they can use modern methods.
Elton John's son - - IS -- Elton John's son. Did he use a surrogate? Yep - - just like many straight couples do.
No - - I don't have "father" issues. I just celebrated my 21st wedding anniversary.
Mod Note: Civility & Decorum are Expected Please Review This Link.edit on 13-2-2011 by Ahabstar because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by youdidntseeme
reply to post by dr_strangecraft
I wasnt addressing any level of appropriatness here,
just asking whether or not you tolerate the items on the list of affirm them, and where you draw the line.
Essentially its about intellectual honesty, I dont think that is out of bounds in this discussion, so I will ask again...
Originally posted by Annee
"Whether or not a gay gene, a set of gay genes, or some other biological mechanism is ever found, one thing is clear: The environment a child grows up in has nothing to do with what makes most gay men gay.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
Originally posted by Annee
"Whether or not a gay gene, a set of gay genes, or some other biological mechanism is ever found, one thing is clear: The environment a child grows up in has nothing to do with what makes most gay men gay.
You cannot prove a negative assertion with a lack of evidence. It is the logical fallacy known as
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
I DO think it's beyond the bounds of reasonable discussion; you're asking me to unpack a whole barrel of red herrings. And why? I don't have to "prove" to your satisfaction that I'm not a mean person. The thread here was asking about the ATS views on gay marriage, and not whether those who disagree are automatically social neanderthals.
Which is basically what you are accusing me of.
Originally posted by youdidntseeme
There are places in the world where your type of marriage is viewed in the same light that you view same sex marriage.
You have no problem with interracial marriage and in fact are living it. Why? because you are in love with a person of a different race. Just as someone may be in love with someone of the same sex. You affirm one, but will not affirm the other.
I suppose it simply boils down to a belief in what being gay actually is. Is it a choice? Is it biological? We are now seeing same sex attraction is other species. Is that biological or is it a choice of the animal?
Question for all of those who think that being gay is a choice. Could you choose to be gay? or are you simply choosing to not be gay? Is all sexual prefereence a choice?
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
,But I have a counter question, YDNSM,
What about the guys in high school, who just experimented some, but got married to women and have remained married every since? Are they "gay" forever because of something they did back in their youth? Or were they actually straight, and those experiments "don't count" toward their "real" gender identity?
edit on 15-2-2011 by dr_strangecraft because: to fix quotes
Originally posted by youdidntseeme
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
I DO think it's beyond the bounds of reasonable discussion; you're asking me to unpack a whole barrel of red herrings. And why? I don't have to "prove" to your satisfaction that I'm not a mean person. The thread here was asking about the ATS views on gay marriage, and not whether those who disagree are automatically social neanderthals.
Which is basically what you are accusing me of.
Not making any sort of allegations, I am sure you are a wonderful person, obvisouly well educated with a solid head on your shoulders. This has nothing to do with being a social neanderthal or not. This simply has to do with where dr strangecraft draws the line.
Interracial marriage. I affirm interracial marriage. And live it out with my wife, Frau Dr. (she no longer posts here, because she thinks ATS is a mean-spirited place; but that's a conversation for another day.)
I think this might be the most telling of all statements. There are places in the world where your type of marriage is viewed in the same light that you view same sex marriage. You have no problem with interracial marriage and in fact are living it. Why? because you are in love with a person of a different race. Just as someone may be in love with someone of the same sex. You affirm one, but will not affirm the other.
I by no means whatsoever want to attack you or your character, so please dont get your back up here. I suppose it simply boils down to a belief in what being gay actually is. Is it a choice? Is it biological? We are now seeing same sex attraction is other species. Is that biological or is it a choice of the animal?
If one thinks that being gay is a choice, how can they ever see them as the same as anyone else. Being bacl is not a choice. Being born a female is not choice. When we all believe that being gay is not a choice, then we will begin to move forward.
Question for all of those who think that being gay is a choice. Could you choose to be gay? or are you simply choosing to not be gay? Is all sexual prefereence a choice?
Originally posted by youdidntseeme
To answer your question, any level of experimentation certainly does not even come into the debate here. To me, one is born gay or straight, or as you correctly pointed out, bisexual. One may be born homosexual, but never once have homosexual relations, and choose to live their life following societal norms as a heterosexual, but they are still as they were born, and only they would know.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
I will use a hetero example for comparison. I experimented with promiscuity in college. Since then, I have decided that monogamy is the only way to be true to myself and what I stand for. So, am I a monogamist who experimented with promiscuity way back then; or am I a promiscuous guy experimenting with monogamy (for a decade and a half!).
Imagine me having a gay thought. Now a straight thought. now a gay thought. and back to having a straight thought.
Did my orientation change twice in the past minute?
I hope this wasn't too convoluted (I've had loads of coffee this morning, and the ideas are coming pretty fast). But based on the above, I arrive at the following conclusions.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
Did my orientation change twice in the past minute?
Originally posted by manna2
...You cannot for one minute recognize that environmental pollutants are the biggest problem causing these tendencies...