It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What was the average size of the alleged excavated UA93 debris?

page: 1
2
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 07:10 PM
link   
When the first responders arrived at the scene after Flight 93 allegedly crashed, they were astonished what they saw because, to some, it didn't look like a plane had crashed there. The Boeing 757 had supposedly disintegrated into mostly small pieces, described as "small enough to put in a shopping bag" and "nothing larger than a telephone book remained."

Both of those descriptions of the average debris size witnessed on the ground were reported on 9/12.

The excavation of the crater started on 9/13.

My question is, what was the average size of the alleged excavated plane debris?




posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 07:17 PM
link   



here ... average sizes varies depending on who you ask and how they wanna answer ....


edit on 28-1-2011 by seedofchucky because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 05:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by ATH911

My question is, what was the average size of the alleged excavated plane debris?



My questions are:

Why are you asking people on a conspiracy theory website?

Do conspiracy theory websites actually have the facts?

Why haven't you asked Rick King? Do you know who he is?

Why haven't you asked Keith Curtis? Do you know who he is?

Why haven't you asked Mike Sube? Do you know who he is?

Why haven't you asked Roger Bailey? Do you know who he is?

Why haven't you asked Bill Baker? Do you know who he is?

Why haven't you asked Dave Fox ? Do you know who he is?

Why haven't you asked Faye Hahn? Do you know who she is?


For those that don't know. All the above mentioned were first responders to the scene. They have all been interviewed and all talk of plane debris and body parts. They talk of the strong smell of jet fuel.

ATH911, instead of starting new threads every other week asking questions for "debunkers," why dont you do some homework for a change. I have given you e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers, etc of many of the people that were there.

What are you afraid of?

The truth is the answer to that question.







edit on 29-1-2011 by Six Sigma because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Six Sigma
 



My questions are:

Why are you asking people on a conspiracy theory website?

Do conspiracy theory websites actually have the facts?


Because that's what we are here for??

You could have answered the question with provable facts rather than ranting,
but you chose not to...



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 07:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack

Because that's what we are here for??

You could have answered the question with provable facts rather than ranting,
but you chose not to...



Rubbish! ATH911 is NOT looking for answers, he is looking for an argument. If he was honest in his persuit of the truth, he would have already known the answers to the questions he asks.




1. What was the average size of the alleged excavated UA93 debris?

2. Evidence no plane crashed & buried in Shanksville; piles of dirt, but no piles of plane debris

3. Govt reported both UA93 black boxes found on the same day AND a day early!!!

4. Wally Miller on UA93: wingtip hit, 757 cartwheeled, cockpit broke off, rest buried

5. How'd all that debris land on top of Shanks crater?

6. If UA93 crashed at 40 deg and dug down 45 ft...

7. IMPOSSIBLE: Only ONE debris shows UA livery and it's the largest photo'd

8. Claim of only 8% of UA93 passenger remains found supports conspiracy

9. Skeptics, what are the official crash details of UA93?

10. Skeptic's dilemma regarding alleged UA93 wreckage

11. Shanksville forest damage conflicts with official story?

12. Archive of reports inferring most of UA93 was buried

13. Was this Shanks aerial photo taken before, or after cleanup?

14. Where were those 'puddles of jet fuel' at Shanksville?

15. Where was all that 95% of UA93 wreckage?

16. For those who think Flight 93 was shot down...

17. Was a UA 757 even witnessed flying around Shanks?

18. Further proof UA93 didn't bury, media skipped it

19. Why didn't UA93 callers say plane was rolling?

20. How did officials know most of Flight 93 was buried?

21. Claim this UA logo debris taken at Shanksville

22. Claim that UA93 engine piece recovered from pond

23. Skeptics seem to rely on FAITH for Flight 93 buried claim

24. Prove that bulk of UA93 buried itself into the ground

25. Perplexed about the plane's tail sections crashing

26. Show me un-plantable Shanksville debris

27. How would skeptics fake a plane crash scene?

28. LOOK: There is no United color debris in the dumpster!




www.abovetopsecret.com...

28 threads regarding flight 93 started bt ATH911. Count how many have to do with the crash site and the debris. When his threads die, he makes a new one. Indeed if he were serious about finding the truth, he would not have made this many threads and done the research on his own.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 07:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Six Sigma
 


Well I guess he is keeping paid trolls in a job..

That's of course only if you believe the rubbish about paid trolls..



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 07:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Six Sigma
 


Well I guess he is keeping paid trolls in a job..

That's of course only if you believe the rubbish about paid trolls..


It's Saturday. NWO pays time and a half today! Sundays are double time... you still wondering where that 3 trillion went to?



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 07:45 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 



Well I guess he is keeping paid trolls in a job.


Rubbish is right! Oh, and for the record: OVER two dozen thread, essentially the same, that only result in an argumentative stance from the OP, on each occasion.

SO....which person is the "troll"? Hmmmmm??



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 07:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by backinblack
 



Well I guess he is keeping paid trolls in a job.


Rubbish is right! Oh, and for the record: OVER two dozen thread, essentially the same, that only result in an argumentative stance from the OP, on each occasion.

SO....which person is the "troll"? Hmmmmm??


Are you trying to argue that Goverments do not pay people to monitor and post on websites Weed.??
BTW, I don't think you are a troll for obvious reasons..



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Six Sigma

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Six Sigma
 


Well I guess he is keeping paid trolls in a job..

That's of course only if you believe the rubbish about paid trolls..


It's Saturday. NWO pays time and a half today! Sundays are double time... you still wondering where that 3 trillion went to?


You're getting double time for Sunday???? Since when? Wait till I get a hold of my supervisor when he gets back from Davos.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by hooper

Originally posted by Six Sigma

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Six Sigma
 


Well I guess he is keeping paid trolls in a job..

That's of course only if you believe the rubbish about paid trolls..


It's Saturday. NWO pays time and a half today! Sundays are double time... you still wondering where that 3 trillion went to?


You're getting double time for Sunday???? Since when? Wait till I get a hold of my supervisor when he gets back from Davos.


Ahh but whos to say you haven't got multiple accounts??
Two paychecks for one job..



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:10 AM
link   
There is a fine line between a paid debunker and a retired, single, lonely, lost, ignorant, aged, close minded old armchair expert.

Go up to your old granddaddy or some other old gent and tell him about new technology or 911, he will not believe you even tho what you say is fact.

Debunker/Old Guy ----"Our government would never do this to us....." sigh...
edit on 29-1-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack

Ahh but whos to say you haven't got multiple accounts??
Two paychecks for one job..


A conspiracy within a conspiracy within a conspiracy.... who-da thunk?



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by hooper

You're getting double time for Sunday???? Since when? Wait till I get a hold of my supervisor when he gets back from Davos.


Hoop ~

Langly's CBA clearly states double time for the 7th straight day of work. You must be in one of the remote locations.


*the chair is green- two dice with 4's*



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 



There is a fine line between a paid debunker and a retired, single, lonely, lost, ignorant, aged, close minded old armchair expert.

Ah, what do you have against senior Americans? Sounds a little mean. Why so mean? Getting frustrated spinning your wheels and no one is paying any attention to you except some old "debunkers" who keep pointing out that your full of ####?

Go up to your old granddaddy or some other old gent and tell him about new technology or 911, he will not believe you even tho what you say is fact.

That's because us old foggies aren't dumb enough to acccept something as "fact" just because someone uses the word "fact" in the sentence. How do you think we got to be old?

Debunker/Old Guy ----"Our government would never do this to us....." sigh...

You got a couple of choices in life sonny boy. One, you can think everybody is out to "git ya" in which case your doomed to a life of fear and trepidation but at least you think someone is paying attention to you which is really what you fear the most - learning that your not the center of the universe and are quite ordinary. Two, learning that the world and its human characters are a varied lot driven by all sorts of needs, wants and desires and that for every evil government boogey man there are at least 20 decent folks dedicated to making your life better and safer whether you believe or deserve it.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:35 AM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 



Two, learning that the world and its human characters are a varied lot driven by all sorts of needs, wants and desires and that for every evil government boogey man there are at least 20 decent folks dedicated to making your life better and safer whether you believe or deserve it.


One in twenty still leaves room for an awful lot of bad guys..
More than I'd like to see anyways..



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:36 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 



Ahh but whos to say you haven't got multiple accounts??
Two paychecks for one job..

No, no. Its hourly work not piece time. The NWO and their Illumanti masters are pretty tight with a buck.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 09:07 AM
link   
My favourite accusation of being a paid NWO stooge happened to me ages ago on here. The guy said I was obviously in the pay of the CIA, he could tell, how ashamed I must be etc...

I said that yes, I was. At which point he said that I wasn't. But I am, I protested. No you're not he replied, now equally as certain as he had been a mere minutes before of the exact opposite opinion.

As for this nonsense about average size of debris... I mean really. If you've got something investigate it yourself. Don't ask me, I know what I think.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 09:40 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 



One in twenty still leaves room for an awful lot of bad guys..
More than I'd like to see anyways..


Yes, yes it is. Of course, thats just my ballpark, needless to say. However, it still holds that even if the "bad guys" think they're safe, they never know for sure. There is always the potential for someone with a soul to break out. We see it all the time in real conspiracies. Think about guys like Serpico. Even though he was surrounded by less than perfect characters he managed to shine a light on a real darkness. That's why far flung conspiracies are really rare.



posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 11:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by seedofchucky



here ... average sizes varies depending on who you ask and how they wanna answer ....


edit on 28-1-2011 by seedofchucky because: (no reason given)

So one engine part and two black boxes are supposed to give me an idea of the average size of the alleged tons and tons of excavated debris?



new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join