It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DontLegalizeDecriminalize
Originally posted by iamaperson
"Hmm, or one is correct? Correct me if I am wrong but do they not say that this is the only correct religion (pretty much most of them, right?) so therefore your statement is completely void."
Ok, there is one religion that is correct. Which one is the right one to choose then? And how do you know that religion is the correct one and not any other?
"Correct me if I am wrong but do they not say that this is the only correct religion (pretty much most of them, right?) so therefore your statement is completely void."
That is literally exactly what I was trying to get across. Since every or most of religions all state that they are the only correct religion, that would mean that they contradict each other. What I said was that all or most religions say that this is the only correct God that you can worship, you cannot worship any other God but him because any other God would be incorrect. Makes sense? You basically replaced the word God with religion, and tried to turn that against me somehow as if you're some sort of cunning linguist.
"So the point is that because no one has a good enough reason to choose a particular religion over another, we must get rid off religion? Thats what makes religion so bad, so destructive, not having proof? What? "
No, you misinterpreted what I wrote, which is probably my fault for not explaining it better. The destructive part of religion is not the lack of proof, but the pointless wars and fighting that has occurred over time which were spent fighting over which lack-of-proof having religion is the right one. Does that make sense? You may have to reread that sentence a few times, because it's a little jumbled, but I think you'll understand.
"Religion the most destructive part of society!!! Wow, if you can back this statement up"
I think the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, the French Wars of Religion, the Rape of Nanking, and the many other utterly unbelievable acts of untold horrors (nice alliteration) back themselves up here
Originally posted by DontLegalizeDecriminalize
reply to post by iamaperson
"Now what I want is proof that it is religion that done those horrible acts, rather than people who used religion in their favor. Eg. does the Bible (Koran or any other major Holy Book) tell people to murder? "
Well, considering that books are inanimate objects and they are incapable of communicating with other people and telling them to murder, I would say that the books are not responsible for the murders. Also, neither is religion, because it too is not a living, breathing human being, so it also cannot perform these horrible acts. Let it go on the record that you have outwitted me conversationally, and forced me to admit that books and religion cannot speak to humans. You sly dog
Originally posted by kimsie
reply to post by DontLegalizeDecriminalize
Yes both books tell people to murder. Have you not read them yet?
Originally posted by kimsie
reply to post by iamaperson
Yes I am trying to "smarten you"
NO I do not see religion as the cause of horrific acts of violence.
Delusional Psychos cause these acts.
Religion is an excuse.
Religion is basically a culture based reminder that we are not alone in the Heavens and your deeds in this life matter.
Originally posted by iamaperson
This request is for Anti-Theists to fulfill, as they are the ones not only making a statement that God does not exist, but that there should be no religion.
So why should there be no religion?
To be on a mission to abolish all religion,
I would suspect that you have undeniable proof that God does not exist,
and that religion is dangerous/bad/you know what I mean.
To date I have not heard a good enough argument for either of those.
As I said, I am aiming this question kindly at the anti-theists who might be lurking around on ATS, because atheists can safely assume that since there is no evidence or reason for religion, there is no god, and do not need to have evidence against God, and therefore probably do not know of any evidence, but of course if anyone has anything to contribute, please do so.
Anyway, this is my first thread, and I had nothing really to contribute in any topic, so I decided just to get a thread started on a religious topic in the off-topic side. This is just something I have always wondered, does anyone actually have any proof against religion, or does everyone rely upon the fact that there is apparently no proof for God.
Finally, if anyone has proof for God, share that too.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
I actually tried that a while ago, but it became an incredibly muddled discussion. You can check my thread history, I think it's entitled "Proofs of God/reasons to believe in one" or something like that.
Originally posted by kimsie
reply to post by iamaperson
Yes exactly, but the beautiful thing about contradiction in all these religions is simple.
Yin Yang, Good Evil, God Satan, eye for an eye, Karma, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" .... etc blah you heard it all once.
The balance of Good and evil will always stay consistant.
It really is that simple and you are making it too complicated.
Originally posted by iamaperson
Originally posted by Akragon
You mean of course other then the obvious issues the church has...molesting children and trying to cover it up.
Forcing people to believe in fairy tails as opposed to true spiritual knowledge...
Asking for 10-20% or more of their yearly earnings...while most "ministers" sport a nice mercedes and an expensive suit?
Rewriting the book that was supposed to be inspired by God or Godly men (ya right)
Countless murders rapes and other atrosities all though out history in the name of God....
Shall i go on?
Btw i know God exists thats not the problem, religion has little to do with God....that IS the problemedit on 4-1-2011 by Akragon because: Clarity
The church is not the religion, it is the people. Molesting people has nothing to do with religion, it is to do with certain individuals, if there was no religion, there would still be people molesting others, abolishing religion is not the cure for society in that regard (I am sure there are atheist molesters). "Forcing people to believe in fairy tails as opposed to true spiritual knowledge..." true spiritual knowledge? sounds like you are talking about religion and organized religion maybe, I am unsure.
Spending money on the church is a personal thing, not really a part of religion, but of church. You can practice religion without even going to church, and you can go to church without paying anything.
Rewriting a book, I guess this is the proof against validity, but you need to be more specific, I don't see how that makes religion false.
Murder and rape inspired by God, what are you talking about?
Last point I read last, haha. "Btw i know God exists thats not the problem, religion has little to do with God....that IS the problem" so you are talking about religion and organized religion, religion appears to have more than one meaning, which creates a problem, so what Anti Theists are against is organized religion? Why call it anti-"THEISM", theism=The doctrine or belief in the existence of a God or gods
Originally posted by SFlowers
So can I ask you for evidence that there IS a God?
Dont get me wrong, I believe in the Christian God (not necessarily the church... cults are scary and I just got out of one). I don't post topics like this because I can't prove what I believe. So, forgive me, but maybe you should prove the existence of God before asking why people don't believe in Him?
Just my two cents..