It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sashwah
if you want to hear why i think what i do you can listen to the interview I'll be doing with Jerry pippin.
Monday Febuary 13 th at 7:15 Eastern-
Jacques Vallee did mention that what could have happened to us at Rendlesham could have involved mind control. After talking to Col Halt he backed down off of that theory. People have stated that there were 2 different incidents that is correct, I was out there for both of them. I welcome any information that can show thats what happened to us. Please post the document on here and show's how it pertains to our incident for all to see You will not be allowed on here screaming and holloring that your right and everybody else is full of S##t and in saying that thats putting it mildley how some people have come on here. Angelia Joiner why don't you look into this and report back your a reporter.
Take a look at what she has posted and see if there anything to it! As far as being told we don't own the incident that is correct but we did live it and we continue to work on finding out what happened to us based on research and the fact we were there!!
I have read Larry's work. Their behaviour sounds exactly like it is sponsored by AFOSI or whoevers job it is to keep a lid on this - whatever happened.
Originally posted by sashwah
Larry, Peter robbins and I are all banned from that site. I challenged John on his page yesterday after i heard he was accusing me of reguritating Andrew Pikes work, he deleted the comment, didn't respond and copied into the justice site for an "oh dear.. silly blah" patronising fecks they are. They haven't read the document nor have they read Larrys book. they also encourage everyone to ONLY read you can't tell the people. They don't even know what I am saying yet they dispute it!
If you don't subscribe to the time travel theory and your nose is not right up jims arse then you are not allowed in their special gang.
Originally posted by -Blackout-
There was actually trace evidence and marks in the ground where the Triangle craft landed. There was actual physical proof. I dont think a projection could do that.
Originally posted by Pimander
I normally pay attention to what Jacques Vallee has to say about the UFO phenomenon. He has some fascinating ideas and I would not normally place him on the lunatic fringe. However, I do have serious doubts about this statement he made during an interview.
So what do you all think? Can we take seriously the idea that 'virtual reality projectors' are a convincing explanation for cases like the Rendlesham Forest incident? Were the witnesses the subjects of a mind control experiment using holograms? Or do some of you think it more realistic that an E.T. craft really did land in Rendlesham Forest?
edit on 3/1/11 by Pimander because: Typoedit on 3/1/11 by Pimander because: Another bloody typo
Originally posted by The GUT
reply to post by The Shrike
Then again, Shrike, he was prescient in calling the sociological proliferation of the "ufo religion" waaaaay ahead of time...amongst many, MANY other things, so maybe the reality projector is a, well, reality.
He does seem to have--if not first-hand experience--a pretty scholarly knowledge of the various techs that we usually associate with black-ops and/or skunkworks. And he has been involved with DARPA keep in mind, not to mention SRI.
So "Reality Projectors" are not that far-fetched...and actually have historical/scientific precedents.
Reviewing his books now and seeing all that he...predicted...for lack of a better term is fairly eye-opening.
That's not to say I find him the be-all-end-all...just the best mind of our most recognizable "ufologists."
I don't know how long it's been since you've read him, but I'd be interested to hear what you had to say after surveying his works today 20 and 30 years down the road. I'll send you the trilogy if'n your up for it.
Peace.edit on 27-2-2012 by The GUT because: (no reason given)