Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by pinchanze
So whats your point!
That entire post was nothing but a personal attack on someone else's intelligence level. If that is what you are going to attack, it helps to at least appear somewhat intelligent yourself.
A poorly worded, formatted, written, and expressed personal insult in empty defense of Sarah Palin hardly fits the bill.
That would be my point.
Let me try to be even more clear. Typos happen, I am guilty. Spelling seems to get more and more difficult as time with autocorrect word processors eats away at my brain, I am guilty. Saying stupid things happens, I am guilty.
Now. If you are going to go to the effort to post in words on a forum about a subject that involves some reading skills and all you post is a personal insult about someone else's intelligence, you should just try and appear at least slightly intelligent yourself.
Further, I did not attack anyone but I asked a question. Since the attack post was in reference to the poor performance of public schools, I wondered what kind of school produced the writer of said post. It actually seemed relevant to the topic at hand to me. See, if the poster went to a private school and cannot write a coherent sentence, then their disparraging of public schools would seem a bit empty. If said poster was an example of the poor education one gets from public school then I have to question the assessment offered by someone who is a product of such. Since we are discussing public schools and what they can and cannot or should or should not do in context of Michelle Obama suggesting something and people equating it to a bill they just imagined, it seemed like a relevant question to ask.
Can you tell me what kind of school the other poster went to or not?edit on 5-1-2011 by Sinnthia because: (no reason given)
If he gets his point accross whats it matter.. You attacked his spelling and grammer! Are you not attacking his intelligence? Hypocrite!
This is for the most part unrelated, but there is a tie in: I was recently playing Fable 3. There is this side quest in which a guy
gets a magical gargoyle which awakens 50 gnomes. You then have to go around and find the gnomes and kill them. They say very petty, annoying,
childish things seeking an emotional response when you are in their vicinity. Palin is bait for people who cannot look away from a very idiotic
aspect of life, something that honestly only needs to be ignored to go away. These types feed off of the backlash. Don't feed it, and it will die.
Or locate its little hiding place and put a bullet in it's brain, metaphorically speaking, of course. She does encourage me, however. Anytime some
disgusting element of humanity reveals itself, especially in today's world of mass communication, the collective ends up eliminating it. Bitch should
have kept on her p-p-p-p-p-poker face. Granted, she will probably sit pretty and rich for the rest of her life. However, I do think that her antics
cannot be repeated by another, at least not in a similar way, say a decade from now or even less. I believe, although individual life is unfair and
never can be, life in general is fair in the LONG term. When BS exposes itself for too long, it is not allowed to exist, at least for a
while.
