reply to post by ThePeopleParty
Actually, it's still just possible to own firearms,(and not just shotguns) in the UK.
But the number of hoops they want you to jump through is getting silly now,Individual citizens can still own pistols, shotguns and huntng rifles, but
the number of people qualifying is slowly being eroded.
The technique used to justify these draconian gun laws was simple:
Place the mother of a murdered schoolchild on the TV saying 'Banning guns will save childrens lives' or some similar simplistic phrase, and then say
that anyone who wanted a gun was 'already suspect', and make them feel guilty by saying 'Is your hobby more important than the life of my
child?'
Ultimately, however even the figures they provided showed that their argument was a load of rubbish, but by the time anyone had actually read them,
they had slipped the law through while the tears and ink were still wet.
The year before the firearms ban was implemented in the UK the percentage of legal/illegal firearms used in crime looked something like this:
Percentage of guns used in crime that were NEVER owned legally in the UK - 96%
Percentage of guns used in crime that had at 'one time been legally owned' in the UK - 4%
('at one time been owned legally' - this includes guns owned legally BUT used in crime AND those stolen from their legal owners and THEN used in a
crime (it does not even specify a VIOLENT crime, they could have been 'stopped for speeding' while they were carrying an illegal weapon it would
appear on the stats right next to a school shooting)
So considering that the 4% also will include 'technical' infractions such as 'improper transportation' and 'improper storage' and is not all
violent crime, the law could at best prevent less than 4% of crime involving firearms.And it showed that the new laws could NOT PREVENT 96% of
firearms crimes.!
Of course, when the Police wanted more funds to equip SO19 and their various Tactical teams (SWAT equiv.) they shamelessly included things such as
airguns/BB guns/replica guns/stun guns/toy guns/potato guns/CS gas use in the 'Fiream Crime' stats in order to push up the figures to show 'there
was a problem' and get the budget increase they were after. Then they placed a £250,000.00 order with Heckler and Koch for several trucks worth of
full auto H&K G36C's.
They justified this in a newspaper srticle (that I may scan and post for your amusement.- My estimation is that 40-50% of the statements in it are
demonstrably false) The article is full of half truths and outright lies, with which they seek to justify the massive increase in 'weapons
procurement' at a time when violent crime was actually GOING DOWN !
On the subject of which weapons I would include 'in my cache'
, I'd say I'm sticking with my old Barnett 'Commando' crossbow, I've had it for about 15 years, and apart from one dramatic failure (the bow
shattered- my fault) it hasn't let me down yet, and for the poundage thrown, it's easy to cock.Also when tested against soft body armor wrapped
around a sandbag the results were impressive (i.e. TOTAL failure of the kevlar)
It;s quite legal to own 'pointy knives', provided you don't walk around the city with one in your hand, any reasonable reason for owning one such
as 'work' or 'campcraft' would usually be sufficient to explain to al but the most bloody minded cop (unless they find your knife sticking out of
someone)
and, as long as you don;t claim that a Fairbairn Sykes commando knife is used for 'stripping insulation off electrical wires at work' or for
'peeling fruit', any 'sensible' blade would be OK. (You could still legally own a F&S commando knife at your home or in a collection, though). I
carry a Leatherman all day at work and I've never had any problems.