It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A military jury today convicted a Birther Army doctor who refused to deploy to Afghanistan on the grounds that orders from President Obama are illegitimate, a development that marks the full maturation of the conspiracy theory that Barack Obama was not born in the United States.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
(And in any case: What he is doing and not doing today is more important than where his parents happened to be at the time of his birth)
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I disagree.
Where his parents happened to be at the time of his birth represents the "rule of law" as opposed to the "rule of men."
Important...but MORE important than his allegiance today?
Originally posted by backinblack
That's actually a more troubling question than where he was born ..
Where does his loyalty lie??
Originally posted by zcflint05
\. Funny how we never asked any white Presidents to show their birth certificates.
The President is the most scrutinized person on the Planet so dont be too surprised if official msm stories about him turn out to be true.
Originally posted by filosophia
hmm, another military person did the same thing and got away with it, perhaps it was just two different judges, he should appeal to a higher court.
Originally posted by filosophia
hmm, another military person did the same thing and got away with it, perhaps it was just two different judges, he should appeal to a higher court.
Because he's a reserve soldier who volunteered for an active duty tour he can "ask for a revocation of orders up until the day he is scheduled to report for active duty,"
Originally posted by Skyfloating
(And in any case: What he is doing and not doing today is more important than where his parents happened to be at the time of his birth)
Originally posted by Phoenix
No past president has sealed records of their past like Obama has, one must ask why is that? especially on a conspiracy site such as ATS.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
It's been asked MANY times on ATS. No one has provided proof that he DID seal his records any differently than any past president. It's just a birther rumor.
Originally posted by Phoenix
BH, its entirely understood that this has been asked but its also falling under trying to prove a negative.
The point of proof is the actual lack of record availability to clear the question - proof enough? or are you maintaining that the records don't exist.
Real point of my post response is once again a court has ruled on something else legally while ignoring the elephant in the room.
One would think "O's" supporters would be clamoring for an answer from him
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
We have the answer. We've had the answer since he posted his BC online.
Originally posted by Phoenix
I find it ironic that some are so protective of Obama's privacy
BH, are you on record somewhere as being protective of others privacy such as John Kerry, Al Gore or GWB? or may I infer you are only protective of the "One"
Clinton was a Rhode's Scholar - one doe's not get that with low score's, not really an issue with him eh! - find another straw-man please.