It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

We are in the midst of a HUGE war going on... right now!

page: 2
46
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:17 PM
link   
4chan and all its moronic little anon peadofiles need slapped, they are affecting the lives of millions of innocent people around the world with their pathetic stunt, it's not even hacking, it's flooding sites with requests making them inaccessible. If their actions were aimed at the governments, or the legal systems involved in the WLeaks saga, then I wouldn't be bothered, but what they are doing is an attack on the people, not TPTB.





posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:20 PM
link   
reply to post by woogleuk
 


Maybe things / actions like these that 'Affect' individuals actually ''wakes them up'' from bloody Eastenders or some other rubbish and makes them see that we are no more than cattle for the corps....

Regards
PDUK



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Monts
 


Don't you think your being a little over dramatic. A war? Come on.....



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:28 PM
link   
another tidbit

Only five countries do not have controlled central banks

Iran, Syria, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela.
ALL other countries have central banks controlled by the
Evelyn Rothschild led private international banking cartel.

CIA assets are working on destabilizing
Venezuela and Cuba through revolution
and a puppet regime

And the wiki cables promote hate toward
Iran and North Korea so an invasion
could force them to allow a central bank
if occupied.

Can't anyone see, this is all about
money and power through central
banking world wide ???

and before the Iraq and Afgh invasions
you could have added those 2 countries
to the list of no Rothschild Central Banks.

The US Military and it's allies are doing the
bidding for the Rothschild take-over
of the world. The NWO.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by AdAbsurdum
reply to post by Monts
 


I don't think it is right to call it terrorism when they are fighting the overbearing establishment. This isn't a group of people attempting to scare the populace into doing what they want as the word insinuates... this is technological freedom fighting.


True, but most freedom-fighting groups are always considered terrorist by the people they are opposed against. I'm sure the British saw the revolutionaries in America as terrorists back in the 1700s. Any group that uses scare tactics to bend the public will is by definition a terrorist group.

But like you, I kind of like these terrorists.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Monts
 


lol, then can we stop calling them terrorists so that dumb people wont associate them with suicide bombers?



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by amc621
reply to post by Monts
 


Don't you think your being a little over dramatic. A war? Come on.....


This is the 21st century.

War is different now than it was before.

We call this age the Age of Information, so naturally the biggest of battles or fought for control and regulation of information.

Do you think that if China and the US were to be at war with eachother, that either country would physically invade or attack the other?

All they would need to is initiate a massive cyber attack or EMP to totally take down the electronic infrastructure of either side to take them out.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by nite owl
PERFECT timming to take off jesse ventura FEMA CAMPS and what going on there. I wonder what wiki is saying about FEMA CAMPS. Go wiki your so fine, your so fine you blow my mind, go wiki, go wiki, Go wiki your so fine, your so fine you blow my mind, go wiki, go wiki.
edit on 8-12-2010 by nite owl because: (no reason given)


You fan boys are hillarious..

If you support wikileaks, then support them, but please, PLEASE don't turn them into a freakin pop song....
edit on 8-12-2010 by thecinic because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by AdAbsurdum
I don't think it is right to call it terrorism when they are fighting the overbearing establishment. This isn't a group of people attempting to scare the populace into doing what they want as the word insinuates... this is technological freedom fighting.

I believe your viewpoint may be misguided.

They (wikileaks) are NOT fighting the establishment.
They are targeting opponents of the Rothschild
Banking Cartel.

Iran does not have a Rothschild Bank
North Korea does not have a Rothschild Bank
Hilary Clinton is Obama's biggest opponent in next election
Bank of America is NOT a Rothschild aligned bank

but they give the impression to the world they are
fighting the establishment. But the leaks are
targeted and for an agenda. They are only
targeting the part of the establishment that
oppose them. That is an agenda for the NWO.
They eliminate all who stand in their way.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by AdAbsurdum
 


Oh they're not terrorists alright, they're PainInTheArseorists, what exactly are they trying to prove? other than they can actually step away from grotesque images of children for 5 minutes (yes, i have been to the 4chan site, and although there is an occasional funny image, it's pretty much all the same tripe)

I like the big corporations about as much as the next man, but the fact is, they are there, and we rely upon them.

Attacking PayPal, Mastercard and Visa etc is accomplishing nothing more than annoying us grown ups, and once the 4chan crowd achieve puberty, if at all possible, they too might require these services to do the stuff normal, mature human beings do (or buy more child porn from pedo bear enterprises, lol).



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
I believe your viewpoint may be misguided.

They (wikileaks) are NOT fighting the establishment.
They are targeting opponents of the Rothschild
Banking Cartel.


Not wikileaks. Anon.


Iran does not have a Rothschild Bank
North Korea does not have a Rothschild Bank
Hilary Clinton is Obama's biggest opponent in next election
Bank of America is NOT a Rothschild aligned bank

but they give the impression to the world they are
fighting the establishment. But the leaks are
targeted and for an agenda. They are only
targeting the part of the establishment that
oppose them. That is an agenda for the NWO.
They eliminate all who stand in their way.


I know all about the centralized banking stuff. When I read the cables I didn't see anything pressing for war with Iran and North Korea. I saw reasons why we shouldn't. Maybe the MSM is reporting it differently but as far as what is actually in the cables, it doesn't bode well for American foreign policy.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by woogleuk
I like the big corporations about as much as the next man, but the fact is, they are there, and we rely upon them.

therein lies the slavery.
we should NOT rely on them.
Those are the strings that must be
cut so we are no longer a puppet.
It requires sacrifices most are not
willing to part with



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by AdAbsurdum
 


Oh they're not terrorists alright, they're PainInTheArseorists, what exactly are they trying to prove? other than they can actually step away from grotesque images of children for 5 minutes (yes, i have been to the 4chan site, and although there is an occasional funny image, it's pretty much all the same tripe)


They aren't trying to prove anything. They are just milking the lulz cow.


I like the big corporations about as much as the next man, but the fact is, they are there, and we rely upon them.


Subject for another thread I suppose, but that's a bad thing and it's the reason why this has so much potential for generating massive amounts of lulzy material.


Attacking PayPal, Mastercard and Visa etc is accomplishing nothing more than annoying us grown ups, and once the 4chan crowd achieve puberty, if at all possible, they too might require these services to do the stuff normal, mature human beings do (or buy more child porn from pedo bear enterprises, lol).


I rest my case.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:58 PM
link   
I can see all the Hogs at the trough, squealing with delight as they wallow in tax dollars, "lets have a round of hookers" is heard over the squeals.

Yes, control of the internet is the goal in all of this.

I wonder if they have thought this through thoroughly? I mean, many people have had a belly full of Government control. Do they even stop to consider the implications?

I do think there are much bigger fish to fry than a few bits of information that we all kind of knew was going on anyway, well at least the thinkers. Oh, they will grant privileged access to the system based on your level of support. A lack of support from you will get you black balled.

Geez, we would all have to work then. Oh, that would put me in a higher tax bracket.

If you are in a non compliant nation, good luck with hearing anything, unless from approved sources.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by AdAbsurdum
When I read the cables I didn't see anything pressing for war with Iran and North Korea.

or maybe u didn't see Hilary Clinton's
speech following the release where she
said basically "all the world hates Iran".
is that not pressing for war by swaying
public opinion for it ???



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:00 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


True, but not in our lifetime, sadly.

BTW Boondock, are you writing on an iPad? Is that why your lines are so short? I'm curious as I have noticed a few people writing like that and I was considering purchasing an iPad.
edit on 8/12/10 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:02 PM
link   
Well actually... The first time terrorism appeared in the Stanford ? English dictionary, somewhere in the 17 hundreds. The definition was government rule by keeping the people in a state of fear. Not exactly these words cause I can't remember right. So the Americas were not considered terrorist back then.
 


The attack on mastercard has a good reason. Mastercard shut down any online donations to wikileaks. Isn't that like a crime itself ? Mastercard is acting like they are the judge themselves. This shows us that they obviously picked a side and it isn't ours.

Personally I second Boondock saints.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:02 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


She might be, but the cables say they aren't any threat.

Just because everyone else is jumping off a bridge doesn't mean you have to.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by woogleuk
BTW Boondock, are you writing on an iPad? Is that why your lines are so short?

lol
No I am not on an IPad.

I type like this cuz I have bad
eyesight and have the text
enlarged on my screen.
However in doing this, it creates
a text box wrapping effect on
the screen. In order for me to read what
I type, I have to use the side scroll.
Using the scroll is a pain so I type in
small lines so I don't have to scroll.



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 02:13 PM
link   
Great thread Monts!

And I agree, this is one of the most important topics and issues facing ALL of us right now!

I posted that thread about the "anonymous" group taking down that Swedish prosecutions web-site, and I am surprised to see how little response it has gotten.

To me, this subject matter is of the utmost importance to be discussing and getting involved with!

Starred and flagged.



new topics

top topics



 
46
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join