It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rocky Black
How about Manning. I think he should be put to death for treason against his coutry at a time of war.
Sorry Bradley Manning you should be shot by a firing squad for what you have caused. People will die because of this.
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
reply to post by wcitizen
As much as it is a setup.. is it surprising that even the Financial TImes is portraying it that way?
and while Australia and the US look for a loophole to try to arrest Assange the British Gov are sitting twiddling their thumbs, even now saying this has nothing to do with them and is solely a mater for the Police.
Originally posted by harrytuttle
Can someone explain why these "rape" charges don't mean the same thing as they mean in America? I've heard something along those lines.edit on 7-12-2010 by harrytuttle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by Rocky Black
How about Manning. I think he should be put to death for treason against his coutry at a time of war.
Sorry Bradley Manning you should be shot by a firing squad for what you have caused. People will die because of this.
Yeah, can't have people dying in a time of WAR, can we?
I'm SO sick of hearing this god damned BS. THOUSANDS of soldiers are dying, LONG before wikileaks, because our corrupted politicians send OTHER peoples kids to die to make sure their corporate buddies interests are protected. That's the TRUE f-ing crime, and if wikileaks exposes that (further than it already has been), then perhaps people will stand up and put a stop to it, then *gasp*, people will STOP dying, because of this. Perhaps Manning was just trying to SAVE the lives of his brothers in arms, and get back to our military being used to actually protect this country, not to secure corporate interests in sovereign nations...edit on 7-12-2010 by 27jd because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by harrytuttle
reply to post by thecinic
Not only are you trolling, you aren't even contributing to the discussion. Thanks for sharing with us what little goes on in your mind.
Can someone explain why these "rape" charges don't mean the same thing as they mean in America? I've heard something along those lines.edit on 7-12-2010 by harrytuttle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmlima
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by RichieScott1
There *has* to be a method of avoiding the planted agitators..there has to be.
Failing a march...how about a million signature petition?
Aim for a million, if there's more so much the better.
None of that works. You need leverage , and someone influential, a lobbyist preferably, to move around the commons and find some simpathy.
Have you guys not read the cables and how things work?
Originally posted by Rocky Black
I bet he wont last through the night. This guy is dead period. I bet he hangs himself in jail.
Anyone want to place a bet.
PS how do I start a new thread.
I have a new thread to start.
Can someone create one for me you have me permission.
Julian A was found dead in cell this morning when guards went to check on him..
He was found hanging from the light by he sheets.
RB
Count down day 1.
Originally posted by RMFX1
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by RMFX1
I don't know why the majority of people assume that this guy is innocent or that he's being stitched up.
So he's the figurehead of an organisation that are commited to releasing classified documents of no consequence (so far). That doesn't mean that he isn't a rapist. If he is a rapist then he should go down for rape, and then he should probably be sent to jail for handling and distributing stolen classified material.
I agree, however, its how they are going about this which is absurdly blown out of preportion. No bail for the actual crime he is being charged with(not rape, but the technicals of not using a condom properly, sexual harassment, etc..) its absolute nonsense that would be laughed at by any court system if he was a "normal guy". hell, even rapists..like proper rapists, get bail. Suggesting he is a flight risk...he is not some unknown whom tried to run away...he is a damn celeberty now whom turned himself in.
there is no precidence in this...its completely corrupt.
Rape blown out of proportion? Maybe they haven't granted bail because they are afraid that he'll flee due to the serious nature of his other crimes? And who's to say that he isn't a "proper rapist"?
And one more thing, he isn't a celebrity.
Originally posted by frothmouthoz
Assange will be taking it in the ass real soon don't worry peeps.