It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted on Fri 10 June 2011 @ 09:45
************************************************
HATE ME IF YOU WILL FOR BUMPING...
************************************************
But...
Tomorrow is 6/11. Could be switched around.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Signals
posted on Fri 10 June 2011 @ 09:45
************************************************
HATE ME IF YOU WILL FOR BUMPING...
************************************************
But...
Tomorrow is 6/11. Could be switched around.
"Hate" is such a strong indictment for a total failure.......471 Flags?? For a thread started on when, again? Sometime in 2010......the year 2010......and this thread promised:
Nuclear False Flag Alert!! It's ON In 3 Days!
What was the "source" for this proclamation, again? A cartoon episode, on TV? From "The Simpsons"?
471 Flags.....looks like the thread accurately predicted at least one tragedy. It narrows down the beginning of the decline of intellectual acumen of a discussion-based Forum website.........
Originally posted by kalamatas
Why are people still posting on this thread?
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by twenT3SityOfTheSon314
That's pretty big "chutzpah", calling me "ignorant"....
HERE is the video you tried to embed.....MORE of "The Simpsons"...(Keep in mind, I adore that TV cartoon. But, I also happen to be a rational individual, and not prone to every whim of a crackpot idea that floats up from the fevered imaginations of anonymous Internet posters):
Originally posted by harryhaller
I've returned after a while to have a look, and no new info really. The corpse scene bothered me too, but i don't entirely agree with the ideas. But hey, i could be wrong
The AGs: widely spread across the landmass. Either regional command, or possibility of widespread destruction would be valid strategic reasons for doing so.
O'Neil, feds, scenario simulations including the moniker vigilant ... way too close for comfort.
The "Duff" connection is irking me something stupid. That article i posted has creeped me out. If not now ... when? I initially thought "dufflebag" ... but after reading disconcertingly similar storylines, i'm not as sure.
The discussion on this thread however demands it's own response.
Signal, your behaviour and handling of this thread has been exemplary, thank you. I've only just flagged it, it would criminal not to after the time i've spent on it I state categorically: there are subliminal messages in that episode. Relation to reality is a seperate issue, the messages exist, thanks for sharing.
I've come to a conclusion though, the vast number of detractors should be a badge of honour. Curious how when the conversation gets really informative, suddenly 2-3 pages of bolony get inserted by people who add nothing but pain to the universe at large. It detracts from the discussion, overshadows any specific info as it is emotive, distracts those who have interest in the topic with defending their right to discuss what they will.
In answer to Chadwickus, sure, null any flags if hoax, that's cool. But first, anyone who interupts a thread with inane driubbling like yours should receive an instant warn from the moderators. Your and others insults and stupid comments over nothing more than the existance of conversation is juvenile, malicious, and suggestive of both low iq and self esteem. You (collectively) assume arrogant airs of logical superiority, yet contribute nothing. Your rejections can never be construed as constructive in any way. Show us we are wrong if you can, but at least display above simian intelligence.
Mods, can we ask for extra moderation to remove anything that is purely inflammatory against those posting? Seriously, some of these posters have just lowered the ATS bar. This thread is the poorer for their comments, all of them. And some of them claim the thread damages ATS, i disagree and claim it is their constant interuption that in fact discourages possible new members from joining the debate. ATS has a board business section, SURELY that would be a more appropriate place for their rants, as complaints against the topic, or behaviour, or anything else. I've noticed this same problem on other, similar threads. This thread i believe is in the correct forum, here's where i say thanks for making this place available to us, it's certainly unique . Thank you for your attention in this thread to date
Originally posted by twenT3SityOfTheSon314
reply to post by Shivering Coward
I'm sure this has been answered already but it has to do with the rules of the Occult. They have to follow certain rules. One has something to do with showing the victims what they are going to do. It sounds stupid I know but I don't make the rules.
Originally posted by JustMike
I’m going to emphasize yet again that I’m treating all of this as an exercise in analysis. I very much doubt that anything in the “nuke/dirty bomb” line is going to happen today. I also feel that most of here are working on the same premise and are not trembling in fear.
’Kay... Now down to the analysis bit…
You all recall that Executive Order that was released on Nov 4 -- the one about designating new DA’s to replace the Attorney General in the case of need. Because it could have some significance I did some looking at maps and I have something to share with you.
We’ve seen this Executive Order before but as I’m quoting from it we need the exact details, so first, here’s the link to the relevant EO from Nov 4, 2010.
Obviously, as the technical wording is the much the same as the previous order that is now revoked, the most relevant details are the actual US District Attorneys who are now designated. (Note that this designation follows the office of DA, and not just whoever currently holds that office.):
(a) United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia;
(b) United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota; and
(c) United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.
These US District Attorneys replace the ones who were designated in Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008 (Note: the link is to the US Govt. Archive pdf document):
(a) United States Attorney for the District of Maryland;
(b) United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama; and
(c) United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia.
Now, let’s see where all these people are, as their locations are probably more relevant than the specific people.
(1) The DA’s designated in the EO of Nov 4, 2010:
(a) The United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.
The address is:
Justin W. Williams United States Attorney's Building
2100 Jamieson Ave
Alexandria, VA 22314
(b) The United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota.
The address is:
600 U.S. Courthouse
300 S. Fourth St.
Minneapolis, MN 55415
(c ) The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.
The address is:
Two Renaissance Square 40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4408
(2) Okay, now let’s see the address details for those DA’s who were designated in the prior EO.
The DA’s designated in the EO of Dec 9, 2008:
(a) The United States Attorney for the District of Maryland.
The address is:
36 S. Charles Street 4th Fl.
Baltimore, MD 21201
(b) The United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama.
The address is:
63 South Royal Street
Suite 600
Mobile, Alabama 36602
(c ) The United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia.
The address is:
Richard B. Russell Federal Building
75 Spring Street, S.W.
Suite 600
Atlanta, GA 30303-3309
So, that’s where they are. Showing them all on one map, we get this:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/19c702e7645e.jpg[/atsimg]
(If images won't fully display just right-click them and select "view image")
If we now connect up the three former ones (green lines) and the three new ones (red lines) we get:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4ae08f95bba3.jpg[/atsimg]
We can notice a couple of things from this. The “old” designated DA locations are very nearly in a straight line, and all in the eastern half of the US. This was not very bright, to be honest about it. Not good to have all these “ducks” lined up in one row, so to speak. The “new” DA locations are spread out much more, and this is far better from a worst-case attack scenario perspective. However, moving from Maryland to Virginia is not all that brilliant, because as this EO would be partly to cover the bases in the event of a major attack, then they’re so close together that the “new” one would probably be rendered ineffective anyway.
However, here’s the most interesting part. If we can accept that the Virginia and Maryland offices are so close that it makes little difference, and then we connect up everything, we get this:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6493b1efc8bd.jpg[/atsimg]
And here’s the Google Earth view of the same places (Angle of image looks slightly different because of the GE globe’s actual positioning):
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6ff051ce44ac.jpg[/atsimg]
Do you all recall how the Illuminati are said to have a love of patterns and symmetry?
Info for the curious: the intersection point in this rather crude effort is around 38 deg 15 min N, 90 deg 35 min W. By the way, the nearest major city to that intersection point is St Louis, which is located at around 38 deg 38 mins N, 90 deg 13 min W. But my lines could be out by some fractions of a degree anyway.
Not suggesting that St Louis is “it” (as there is no justification for that). Just wanted to share this with you.
Final comment: I am curious if the rocket/missile launch that was witnessed in Phoenix yesterday has any relevance to the above.
Mike
edit on 6/11/10 by JustMike because: Info about viewing the images
Originally posted by VonDoomen
Now how tje heck did this get so many flags??