I was about to post something along the lines of " Well, we don't know if she was rushing the stage area and causing a ruckus " but then I saw that video...

That step was not an accident, or even a step! That action was more like a curb stomp! And the man completing it did not look like a security guard in the least bit.

The followers are more dangerous than the elects at this point!

Originally posted by hotbakedtater



I am disgusted that so many people are advocating for this woman, who was there to intigate, possibly stir violence. She was a plant, and damn she did her job well. Look at all of us talking about this!

Regardless of her previous affiliations or background she had a right to express her first amendment rights, the same as you, me or someone dressed up in a monkey suit.

I agree let the courts decide if she posed a threat or not. And if not sue the dog **** out of the man that obviously assaulted her and the campaign he worked for. There was no call for abusing that woman after she had already been restrained.

If he had of assaulted my GF, mother or female friends the way he did....getting sued would be the least of his worries!

"Interesting, so, you just joined today, this is your first post, and yet, you already know enough about my political position to know that I advocate voting as one of the ways to fix what is wrong in this country."

I know what you posted. Seriously...if you can't defend it, don't post it. Otherwise, man up.

I never said I didn't vote in the last election; I said I didn't vote for McCain or Obama. For someone who's supposedly big on researching facts, you seemed to miss that one. Big time. "I voted for neither candidate" in your mind, apparently, means that I didn't go to the booth and check any boxes. Can you also discern from that statement that I shot Kennedy, and am part of the Illuminati? Nut.

And for the paranoid ones (*ahem*), you should reread the post. I am against BOTH parties, because they've bastardized the two-party system. They want us to vote for parties instead of candidates, and that's the exact opposite of the way things are supposed to work. When I was 18, I registered as a Republican, and yes, I voted along party lines. A decade of serving my country opened my eyes, and now, I'm proud to say that I research the candidates, and place votes accordingly, based on candidate platform. This midterm election, however, is an exception--I'm voting against incumbents. Even those who are not technically incumbents lost my vote; if someone's been in office, and is running for a different position, I'm voting against them. Hooray for voter discontent.

Gee, I suppose if my very first post had been "UFOs are real!", then I would be generally accepted by the few paranoid hacks in here. Fortunately, I neither deal with those individuals, nor am I concerned with their thoughts of me.

I think it's great that the Tea Party candidates can overthrow the established candidates, and run roughshod over the primaries. I also think it's disgusting how some of these underdogs abuse the power they think they have. And the worst part of it is the GOP trying to rally everyone behind the winning candidate, simply because they won the Republican nomination. (Of course, that's *after* the GOP tries to pick and choose whom they will fund, due to pouting over their golden child losing a primary election.)

Flame on, whatukno. I posted what I wanted, and I'm done with ya.

After reading through the thread again.

I declare whatukno the loser in this debate. Hopefully you use a little more facts and logic in the tournament, otherwise you will not go very far.

First off, people have admitted that footstomper mcstomperman was wrong.

But does whatukno acknowledge THAT anywhere? NOPE, just keeps plugging away on the smear campaign.

I guess I can use the same tactic as whatukno.

All Muslims are terrorists.

All liberals are communists.

All Obama backers are expecting free money, free healthcare, free homes, etc.

All Democrats are baby killers.

All union members are communist infiltrators.

Hmmm, like that logic there whatukno? That is the exact logic you use.

You do not happen to be Ed Schultz are you, or just a clone?

Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
I declare whatukno the loser in this debate. Hopefully you use a little more facts and logic in the tournament, otherwise you will not go very far.

Hmmm, like that logic there whatukno? That is the exact logic you use.

Who are you to judge anything? And ever hear of the term "doublespeak" or "misinformation" or "baseless assumption"? Because you just commited all three in your post.

I'm glad I'm not an American because when I demonstrate, I don't carry signs. I actually speak my mind and if the establishment doesn't hear me, I yell it. I would be beaten to death in such a situation as this woman who was stomped just for my expression of freedom. She followed the rules of being a proper law-abiding demonstrator and you demonize her. In other countries, you wouldn't see signs and stomps, you would see crowd control, car bombs and open rebellion.

So screw your freedom and liberty, be thankful for your security. Remember what Benjamin Frankin said? "Those who give up liberty for security, deserve neither liberty nor security." So be thankful for your little secure extremist rallies, because everyone else with half a brain in the world thinks your country deserves neither freedom or security.

Not that I agree with what happened, but don't we remember don't taze me bro?

This is two sides of the same coin. It shouldn't be happening at all, but each side likes to demonize the other when it happens to a member of their side. Nevermind the fact that all this right-wing/left-wing crap is utterly ridiculous. I can't count the amount of times I've seem people refuse to even debate an issue, or tolerate a person, on grounds that the opposition is of the opposing wing. It's just silly.

I just loved it when the dude that stomped on the girls head, was interviewed, not showing is face lol, and said that he wanted a apologie for the girls behavior, long live freedom.

Originally posted by ScarletNyx
I was about to post something along the lines of " Well, we don't know if she was rushing the stage area and causing a ruckus " but then I saw that video...

That step was not an accident, or even a step! That action was more like a curb stomp! And the man completing it did not look like a security guard in the least bit.

The followers are more dangerous than the elects at this point!

It's a technique. You put the foot on the shoulder angled and push down. The victim raises the head instinctively, just in time for the heel to come down on the lower back of the head and neck causing it to snap into the sidewalk and cause a concussion. It's a sneaky tactic used by Police, Skinheads, and thugs. He would have done it again if he'd had the chance.

A crime regardless of Political affiliation.

Ziggy

I agree with SevenBeans that if a person is acting irrational and suspicious he or she should have been removed from the event for further observation.. I do not agree in any way with violence. The person who stomped on her head should be prosecuted. What he did is classified as malicious assault, and he should be arrested. Period!