The Royal Academy to discuss “extra-terrestrial life and the UN agenda” *BREAKING NEWS*

reply to post by Phage


Listening now. Regardless, others have seen them beaming lights into the facilities, not just Malmstrom. Even you, when this thread started, you said quote: "this is nothing new"

Interestingly enough, Robert Jamison - USAF nuclear missile targeting officer -speaks of a procedure when UFOs are encountered at the sites.

reply to post by FlySolo

It isn't anything new. Not to anyone who has been paying attention.
There was no new evidence offered in any of these cases.

reply to post by Phage


Then why would you suppose they would even bother to have a procedure? I would love to hear your thoughts on that. And please, don't say there is no evidence of a procedure.

reply to post by FlySolo

What does that have to do with the fact that neither he, nor Salas, nor anyone else who has spoken has said they saw a UFO? Zorgon said they did. They did not. There are no eyewitness reports. Saying there are is incorrect and clouds the issue.

ALIEN MOVIES ALL OVER CABLE CHANNELS! WHY?

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FlySolo

 

There are no first hand accounts of the alleged UFO reports at Malmstrom.

Got it. Patrick Mcdonough, assigned to Malmstrom testifies that a ufo shone a light into the silo. This is the one with the opened hatch you were referring to.

Originally posted by bobw927
ALIEN MOVIES ALL OVER CABLE CHANNELS! WHY?

VAMPIRE MOVIES IS BEING SHOWN EVERYWHERE TOO! WHY?

reply to post by FlySolo

No. Patrick McDonough was not at Malmstrom when the malfunctions occurred.
No wonder you can't figure out what I'm talking about.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FlySolo

 

What does that have to do with the fact that neither he, nor Salas, nor anyone else who has spoken has said they saw a UFO? Zorgon said they did. They did not. There are no eyewitness reports. Saying there are is incorrect and clouds the issue.

It has a lot to do with everything. As I pointed out Mcdonough saw the ufo doing it's thing. Hinging this entire debate on what Salas says or doesn't say doesn't disprove anything. Moot point really. They were flying over silos, eye witnesses to this event AND there is a procedure to follow.

I'm not being sarcastic, but I would really like to hear what you think about what I asked you. Why are there procedures if this is all nonsense and the military flat out denies ANY possibility of this.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FlySolo

 

No. Patrick McDonough was not at Malmstrom when the malfunctions occurred.
No wonder you can't figure out what I'm talking about.

I heard him say he was assigned to Malmstrom, and then he gave his testimony. What more do you want? He doesn't say a nuke was tampered with but what would a UFO be doing there anyway?

reply to post by rajaten

nope, something`s up

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FlySolo

 

No. Patrick McDonough was not at Malmstrom when the malfunctions occurred.
No wonder you can't figure out what I'm talking about.

I heard him say he was assigned to Malmstrom, and then he gave his testimony. What more do you want? He doesn't say a nuke was tampered with but what would a UFO be doing there anyway?

if i remember correctly he said that there werent any missiles at that silo at the time where he saw the UFO.

line 2

Ok Phage, I hinged it for you


He watched the panels indicating 8-10 missiles went down one by one. It came out of his mouth so let's put this to bed

reply to post by FlySolo

I didn't say the missiles didn't malfunction.
I said there are no eyewitnesses to UFOs being present at the time.
If you can't understand that I can't help you.

reply to post by homeskillet


You're right. However, we're getting caught up in all the minor details which only blurs the big picture. This is the debunker's tactic.

reply to post by FlySolo

Right.
Details are not important. Changing the story is not important.

reply to post by Phage


Oh my god. Listen to yourself. Ok ok ok, Salas didn't physically see them, he got a call because someone else saw them. But, he was the managing the panel and he did physically see the nukes go down. So, to make this story true, we must drag in those lower-level officers who called Salas?

If you can't see that, then I can't help you sir.

reply to post by Phage


Of course details are important Phage, but just like what your signature says em?

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FlySolo

 

I didn't say the missiles didn't malfunction.
I said there are no eyewitnesses to UFOs being present at the time.
If you can't understand that I can't help you.

Final thought before I head out for a bit. If you don't disagree that the missiles malfunctioned then what exactly is your point again? Not sounding rude. There were witnesses to this event, missiles kaffed, story over. I lost what you're point is

reply to post by FlySolo

Yes.
You did.