VIDEO: Large Airliners Did NOT Hit the Twin Towers on 9/11!, page 3

Im so glad BONEZ posted the link to that video, as I knew I had seen it just recently. I was having a hard time finding it for here. While looking though, I did come across this piece as well. It has a few more moments of the second plane coming in from another angle.

I do want to say one of my very first thoughts the day this happened was, &%#@ what have we done now? My gut instinct was we were behind it somehow. I do believe planes hit the buildings, I also believe they had some help bringing them down. The good news is we have way more to work with for this mystery then the footage from JFK. So hopefully we will figure this one out eventually, Or maybe we have more or less, we just dont have all the "Who" officially yet.

longer footage of second plane:

reply to post by PookztA

---

OK. Here we go. Let me explain something to you in such a way that there is no misunderstanding. First, about me. I'm an investment advisor with a college degree, and have owned two businesses. I'm 50 years-old, with no history of mental illness. People trust me with millions of dollars. I believe I am a solid citizen.
On September 11, 2001, I witnessed two large airliners fly into WTC 1 & 2. My point of view. About 300 yards. As I travel frequently, I am able to recognize by sight and sound a commercial airliner. As I have witnessed the aftermath of the crash of an airliner in 1983 (New Orleans) I also recognize the smell of burning jet fuel. Whether or not you are lacking basic brain function and mental dexterity to such a degree that you assign blame to anyone other than the muslims who commited this attrocity is your problem, but this is the latest in a series of ridiculous statements, stated as fact no less from people who weren't there, insist that all humans are easily fooled, and that they have figured it all out. If this is the extent you have to go to, and I include the author of this video in this assertion, to get attention, so be it. But know that it is an insult to everyone who lost a family member or friend on that day, and you should be both ashamed of yourself, and embarrased at your own aggresive form of ignorance. With apologies to the staff of this website for straying from attaching personal emotion to my reply, you are a hopeless moron

reply to post by yigsstarhouse

---

If I were the law enforcement or national security agencies involved, I would be investigating the person who shot this footage, as he didn't seem to be surprised.

reply to post by astrogolf

---

You don't have to explain yourself to these people. There are only a handful of people in the world that believe such nonsense. The majority of the world and the entire 9/11 truth movement believe that you saw planes without you having to explain anything other than that you saw them.

So save yourself the wasted time and energy of having to explain anything to people lacking basic comprehension, logic, and education. If you saw the planes, you saw them, period.

Originally posted by wcitizen
One of the pieces of evidence which for me most throws doubt on the integrity of the planes hitting the towers theory is the video where you can clearly see the nose of the plane coming out the other side of the building.

Not only does this defy common sense, that the plane could slice through all those monster steel beams and come out the other side with its nose intact, but it shows some kind of tampering with the video by a manistream news channel. Therefore, I have to ask myself why they would see fit to do this, or even how the thought to do so could even come to mind in the middle of such a horrendous tragedy.

Video can be seen here:

9/11 nose comes out the far side of the tower.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 18-9-2010 by wcitizen because: sp

edit on 18-9-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)

Your rush to embrace no plane theory is based upon lack of imagination and an unwarranted assumption that the plane was a commercial jet. On the other hand, suppose that it was a military cargo plane whose nose had been specially strengthened with depleted uranium - like DU shells used by the USA and its allies in the Gulf War to penetrate Iraqi tanks and which have now poisoned the air in Iraq and elsewhere? Strengthened in order to piece the tower like a DU shell so that the plane could explode INSIDE the tower, causing maximum damage and fire that would make people accept the myth that the damage caused by the planes had caused the towers to fall? Such a reinforced nose could have retained its shape until it was consumed in the fireball as it emerged from the South Tower.

And you believe the media used CGI merely because you did not think of this possibility?

Whenever threads like this come up, I always make sure to put in my two cents with this video. If there was a plane or no plane at all, the media is definitely responsible for faking something.

Originally posted by astrogolf
reply to post by PookztA

---

First, about me. I'm an investment advisor with a college degree, and have owned two businesses. I'm 50 years-old, with no history of mental illness. People trust me with millions of dollars. I believe I am a solid citizen.

We're from the same generation. Based on your background, I have no doubts that you're a solid citizen.

Originally posted by astrogolf
On September 11, 2001, I witnessed two large airliners fly into WTC 1 & 2. My point of view. About 300 yards. As I travel frequently, I am able to recognize by sight and sound a commercial airliner. As I have witnessed the aftermath of the crash of an airliner in 1983 (New Orleans) I also recognize the smell of burning jet fuel.

Still no problem with your observations or recollection. This is undoubtedly what happened.

Originally posted by astrogolf
Whether or not you are lacking basic brain function and mental dexterity to such a degree that you assign blame to anyone other than the muslims who commited this attrocity is your problem, but this is the latest in a series of ridiculous statements, stated as fact no less from people who weren't there, insist that all humans are easily fooled, and that they have figured it all out... [remainder of emotional, angry diatribe directed at anyone who doesn't believe the official story removed]

Sir, I am neither lacking in brain function or mental dexterity. Far from it. Regarding your belief that 19 Muslims carried out the attacks, there are many honest, sincere people like yourself who, for whatever reason, have not taken the time to fully investigate the events that you personally witnessed on September 11th. Until a few years ago, I was one of them. I know it seems inconceivable to you and many others that our own government could've played a role in the 9/11 attacks. There are hundreds of threads in this forum alone that detail the overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence that this in fact is what happened. These types of "false flag" attacks -- based on the Hegelian Dialectic of Problem/Reaction/Solution have been employed by EVERY government since Nero's burning of Rome. Sorry to say, 9/11 was the modern-day equivalent of Germany's Reichstag Fire or Russia's Moscow apartment bombings, intended to rally the citizens around endless war. As anyone can see, it's worked like a charm. Osama bin Laden (a CIA creation known as "Tim Osman") is nothing more than Big Brother's Emmanual Goldstein from the novel '1984'.

Both you and I and most Americans wish the U.S. government was somehow different. Unfortunately, it's not.

reply to post by illumin8ed

---

I think it is absolutely dumb to still think there were no planes. It would be far easier to just use planes.

For a conspiracy of this magnitude to work would be virtually impossible. It would indeed be far, far easier to use airplanes, as was the case to our sorrow.

Originally posted by Asktheanimals
I agree there are some very strange things about the videos shot that day - the discoloration, the lack of any footage of airplanes further away from the towers and the odd "disappearance" of the second plane into the south tower.

First of all, I don't know what you mean by "discoloration", but between smoke and debris in the air and the varying camera quality, it's pretty obvious that whatever you're saying is "discolored" probably wouldn't look like a photograph taken with even a decent quality film camera.

Second, the lack of footage of planes away from the towers is explained by the fact that the first plane was believed to have accidentally hit the WTC. Also, why would anybody have cameras scanning the skyline when the obvious shot is the tower spewing smoke? That's like asking why nobody was taking pictures of the walls in a room where somebody was being mauled by a tiger.

Third, there actually are multiple videos of the second plane hitting the tower that are from quite far away, so your claims are completely ridiculous.

Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags

9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags

9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags

WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traitors are rounded up
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags

What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags

Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags

Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags

British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: