It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tea Party Backs Racist, Beastiality fan

page: 4
15
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


I never forward anything. I'll have a laugh, maybe show my hubby, and then delete it. Some people do though. I don't typically judge people based on what they forward to me, but to each their own.




posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 01:32 PM
link   
Im in construction and we send each other messed up videos all the time as gags. i get a few sick ones i dont watch but it happens. it must have been a gag that went to the wrong person. i doubt he gets off on animal sexs but you never know



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 02:08 PM
link   
I don't know about you guys but I have been sent some pretty sick emails from friends that if they got out could be hard to explain. Seems like stock smear stuff to me.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by JonInMichigan
reply to post by evil incarnate
 


Was it a black horse or a white horse? How about the woman?

Am I not taking this seriously? No.

You see, I wouldn't take the Huntington Post's word for it that it was actually an email about bestiality. Why? Because they (and the OP) made the river-dancing monkeys sound racist when, in fact, it was a commercial that played on national TV during prime time and caused no uproar whatsoever.


You are going to have to provide me with some proof that that commercial ever aired labeled as "Obama's Inaugural Ball"

I never saw any such commercial.


So how do I know they aren’t talking about a video of the commercial I saw recently that featured a Lady Godiva riding naked on a horse (can’t remember the product being advertised) and calling it bestiality. I can see them making that stretch all day long once they did it with the dancing chimps.


Because I actually read the subject matter which you apparently failed to do.The sex with the horse is pretty clear cut.


The liberal spin machine is out in full force now that the people are speaking up and attempting to vote all these hypocrites out of office (both republican and democrats).

One more question:
Was it ok for Bill Clinton to shove a cigar tube somewhere I can’t mention due to ATS’ TOS? Involved was a YOUNG woman and an EMPOYEE of his, not only on government time but in the sanctity of the oval office. But I can see how you would be upset about e-mail being sent from a work computer. I love the double-standard.


I am not sure what Bill Clinton has to do with any of this.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 03:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jenna
Reply to post by evil incarnate
 


I didn't jump to his defense. I pointed out that forwarding something doesn't automatically make you a racist, and it doesn't. Otherwise forwarding anything automatically makes you a supporter of whatever is in it. Which by extension means millions of people believe a good luck fairy is going to come out of their computer and make their true love appear if they can just find 15 people who they can forward the email to.

The article and topic involved in this thread do not require an extensive knowledge of the guys political stances since they are irrelevant.


 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 


edit on 15-9-2010 by Jenna because: Stupid auto spell.. Making me go to the full site to edit so my post is readable..


You did indeed jump to his defense. You ran right over to try and say this means nothing when I beg to differ. I feel this does indeed speak somewhat to his character. The reasons a person forwards the emails they forward can of course only be speculated and debated about but alas, that is what forums are all about. I feel that the number of emails pertaining to the specific subjects are at least if not more evidence of this man's character as any moth on a windscreen pic is a UFO.









edit on 9/15/10 by evil incarnate because: trying to fix quotes



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 03:40 PM
link   
WOW! Wonder what the guy was like he was running against?



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 03:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211
OP, practically every one of your follow on posts is like this one - with you saying you don't understand something.

Can you really be that clueless that you start what is no more than a political baiting/trolling thread and then do not understand any of the responses?



Practically all? Really? Or is it more like 2? Yeah, I think it is TWO. Sorry if I am not following these rants about RHINOS and Democrats in a thread about a Tea Party supported candidate in my state that won the primary and happens to have quite the colorful outbox. What are you getting at?



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 03:59 PM
link   
reply to post by JonInMichigan
 


What's that you say? The Tea party just happened to support and help push through a politician with what seems to be an overtly racist attitude? Awwwwwwe shucks, who cares. The Tea Party has nothing racist about it, it does not support racism, it will oust racism, like any good group of people, the moderates will vocally out the bad extremists, right? RIGHT? Guess they missed this one. Well I found him. Here he is. How about we take a look at him. What? You want to talk about Bill Clinton? RHINOS? Democrats? Klan rallies? The heck you say.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Iamnext1
I don't know about you guys but I have been sent some pretty sick emails from friends that if they got out could be hard to explain. Seems like stock smear stuff to me.


There is a big difference between what you have been sent and what you decide to pass along for giggles in my book. How about you? Would you rather defend your inbox or your outbox?



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by ljtg123
WOW! Wonder what the guy was like he was running against?


The guy he was "running against" was the kind of Republican that had a much better chance of winning against the Democrats in November. Oh well.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:14 PM
link   
So you have a racist candidate with bizarre sexual tendencies on you r ballot? How many other districts have that problem? How many of us were stuck with the same thing on both sides last presidential election......where one side was an unknown, with racist ideals, a hidden past, and no track record? It happens, get over it, I'm sure this isnt the first or last time that you'll be upset with a candidate.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:21 PM
link   
reply to post by adifferentbreed
 


So you are suggesting we all turn a blind eye to our politicians because they will suck anyway?
You sound like a prison guard's dream.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:27 PM
link   
This is the newssite that first broke the story in April..Some of the emails are listed here.

wnymedia.net...

FYI -

I agree with thier take..



We don’t pass judgment on what people want to send around to their friends.

Carl Paladino, private citizen, can send around all the bestiality videos he wants. Carl Paladino the politician cannot. A person can’t send viciously racist emails or graphic hardcore pornographic videos and then claim to be the Tea Party Christian values candidate. These don’t reflect values. They reflect sexual excitement, sexual perversion, and racial animus.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:44 PM
link   
reply to post by evil incarnate
 


Not saying that at all, I'm saying that the MSM and the Dems pushed through a candidate that is a racist, has a suspect past, no track record, funny real estate deals etc, etc, and he was elected. Not only elected, he was celebrated.........where is your outrage for him? Personally, I don't think the guy should have gotten the nomination, however, you can't have it both ways.........



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by adifferentbreed
 


Are you asking me to go back in time?



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:47 PM
link   
Well ive had a bit of a look into this, and this is what he has said in reply to the accusations.

Dear Ms. Huffington:


I was disturbed by the headline and the story regarding my candidacy
for Governor of New York claiming that I "stood by racially
insensitive remarks" during my efforts to reform the Buffalo school
system. I categorically reject the characterization of my remarks as
racially insensitive and you fail to mention that is only the
characterization of my remarks by my critics. More importantly, my
remarks at the time were categorically true - if too politically
incorrect for you and your friends.

Anyone who knows me knows that I hate no man. I'm proud to say that I
have created jobs for people of every ethnicity, color and sexual
preference. Local African-American education bureaucrats "played the
race card" and I called them on it.

These tactics by the protectors of a failed public education system
are the worst form of racism. Incompetence comes in every color.

In case you are unaware, New York State pays more per pupil than any
state in the nation and we have among the highest dropout rate and
highest illiteracy rate for residents between 18 and 25. I will not be
deterred in my efforts to reform our public schools by teachers
unions, racial game players or other defenders of a broken system.

Sincerely,

Carl Paladino

Personally i think the world needs more people like this gentleman in politics, someone who will cut through all the bull and isnt affraid to say what he thinks. An honest man perhaps, someone who isnt bothered about being politically correct.
Its political correctness which is messing up allot of the civilised world, too many far lefties, worrying about rocking the craddle and being called racist, walking gently over ice as to not break it, rather than doing the jobs which they are actually paid to do. Maybe if people were judged on results, rather than media bias things would be allot better.


Just my thoughts


Aaron xx



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:50 PM
link   
reply to post by evil incarnate
 


Nope, I's asking you to acknowledge that this happens on both sides, has forever. The difference is how the MSM manipulates peoples outrage over it. Again, I wouldn't vote for him, but being a hypocrite never has worked, except for the left.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by AaronF
 


Got any o' them thar fancy letters that state that his "'n-word's" poster was taken out of context or misconstrued in some way?

Also, what does he have to say about the proper characterization of his interspecies sex tape?


edit on 9/15/10 by evil incarnate because: add second question



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by adifferentbreed
 


Seems you have an agenda and you have stated it. Unfortunately, my thread is not about your agenda so I will simply leave it at thanks.



posted on Sep, 15 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by maybereal11
 


Well, that was more of an eyeful than I had expected... Might have been nice if I'd known it was right there on the page you linked to instead of discovering it for myself. I now feel the need to bleach my eyes out, so thanks for that.


Before I went blind from your link, I couldn't help but notice they say the emails all originated with him yet every one of them said "FW:" at the beginning. Meaning he didn't start it, he just forwarded on what was sent to him at his work email. Poor taste? Absolutely. Misuse of company resources? Definitely. Does it automatically make him depraved or a racist? Nope.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join