It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JonInMichigan
reply to post by evil incarnate
Was it a black horse or a white horse? How about the woman?
Am I not taking this seriously? No.
You see, I wouldn't take the Huntington Post's word for it that it was actually an email about bestiality. Why? Because they (and the OP) made the river-dancing monkeys sound racist when, in fact, it was a commercial that played on national TV during prime time and caused no uproar whatsoever.
So how do I know they aren’t talking about a video of the commercial I saw recently that featured a Lady Godiva riding naked on a horse (can’t remember the product being advertised) and calling it bestiality. I can see them making that stretch all day long once they did it with the dancing chimps.
The liberal spin machine is out in full force now that the people are speaking up and attempting to vote all these hypocrites out of office (both republican and democrats).
One more question:
Was it ok for Bill Clinton to shove a cigar tube somewhere I can’t mention due to ATS’ TOS? Involved was a YOUNG woman and an EMPOYEE of his, not only on government time but in the sanctity of the oval office. But I can see how you would be upset about e-mail being sent from a work computer. I love the double-standard.
Originally posted by Jenna
Reply to post by evil incarnate
I didn't jump to his defense. I pointed out that forwarding something doesn't automatically make you a racist, and it doesn't. Otherwise forwarding anything automatically makes you a supporter of whatever is in it. Which by extension means millions of people believe a good luck fairy is going to come out of their computer and make their true love appear if they can just find 15 people who they can forward the email to.
The article and topic involved in this thread do not require an extensive knowledge of the guys political stances since they are irrelevant.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by centurion1211
OP, practically every one of your follow on posts is like this one - with you saying you don't understand something.
Can you really be that clueless that you start what is no more than a political baiting/trolling thread and then do not understand any of the responses?
Originally posted by Iamnext1
I don't know about you guys but I have been sent some pretty sick emails from friends that if they got out could be hard to explain. Seems like stock smear stuff to me.
Originally posted by ljtg123
WOW! Wonder what the guy was like he was running against?
We don’t pass judgment on what people want to send around to their friends.
Carl Paladino, private citizen, can send around all the bestiality videos he wants. Carl Paladino the politician cannot. A person can’t send viciously racist emails or graphic hardcore pornographic videos and then claim to be the Tea Party Christian values candidate. These don’t reflect values. They reflect sexual excitement, sexual perversion, and racial animus.