Originally posted by tspark
reply to post by Curiousisall

---

his claim doesn't try to call into question your honor, yours claim does Impugn his

Originally posted by tspark
reply to post by Curiousisall

---

If you can disprove his claim...you need to show the evidence...if not why question it? because you have a feeling he is Lying?

Your welcome and I did not bother to look that far into it. I see no one is bothering to look into how much Beck actually spends on research so I gave up there.

Originally posted by tspark
reply to post by Curiousisall

---

No i sure don't...but if i don't have anything to back up my feeling then all i have is a feeling..right?

Do you always go on your feeling(not saying that is a bad thing)...but generally if i have a Baaad feeling about something i try to find proof that my feeling is vindicated....doesn't that make sense?

Originally posted by rusethorcain

I am looking and I can't find it where he spends a dime.

So you are calling him a liar without any proof to the contrary? It didn't turn up on a google search so that make him a liar? I wonder how many multi-million dollar businesses keep detailed pay records on the net? Hurry Google it... I'll check back later. Where would you look for that little tidbit of info? I am unaware of any reason he would have to give an answer. But since you are "researching" this "issue" did you try sending an email of to the Beck people? They probably won't answer you, because frankly it is none of your business the amount of money he spends on anything.

It seems to me the person making the claim in the first place should back it up with proof.

Maybe he will as soon as he sees the ATS folks are looking for those answers.... Perhaps he could spend millions to have people watch what the media is saying negative about him.
I doubt it though, he is a private citizen using his own money. Maybe we should be a little more worried about tax dollars being spent to monitor bad press of Obama....

The federal government hired a New Orleans man for $18,000 to appraise whether news stories about the government's actions in the Gulf oil spill were positive or negative for the Obama administration, which was keenly sensitive to comparisons between its response and former President George W. Bush's much-maligned reaction to Hurricane Katrina.

www.foxnews.com...
www.nola.com...

Why should anyone respond to what is at best an inaccuracy or at worst a lie?

Since you feel that way can I ask why you have spent so much time in this thread?

Sort of a waste of everyone's time, I think.
But that is Glenn Beck summarized in a nutshell.

Like I said it's your time waste it how you want to....

edit on 15-9-2010 by ljtg123 because: To add more

Asked a series of four questions to test their knowledge about politics and current events, just 14% of the public got all four correct – as many got all four wrong (15%). Two-in-ten got three correct, 26% two and 25% one. Regular readers, viewers or listeners of most media sources outscored the general public.

People were asked which party currently controls the House of Representatives (Democrats), to identify the post held by Eric Holder (U.S. attorney general), which company is run by Steve Jobs (Apple) and which country has an active volcano that disrupted international air travel earlier this year (Iceland).