It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Im not going to go into conjecture and explain things for you. If you are too dim to see the connections then its sadly your problem.
I think the Lucus Destroyer videos which I watched gave some links to substantiate the claim for a 3600 year cycle.
Así pues tenemos dos posiciones estelares de G1.9+0.3 perfectamente diferenciadas en el transcurso de 24 años:
a. 1984 - RA 17h 45m 37s, Dec. -27:09
b. 2008 - RA 17h 48m 45s, Dec. -27:10
Table 1. This table lists (1) The Galactic cooridinates, (2) and (3) the right ascension and declination for epoch and equinox B1950.0
The MOST observations are not at high enough resolution to detect significant changes in the size or mophology of G1.9+0.3 with time.
Twenty years of observations with the Molonglo Observatory Synthesis Telescope show that the young supernova remnant G1.9+0.3 has increased in brightness by 1.22 ± 0.24 0.16 per cent yr−1 between 1998 and 2007
What is a sunward acceleration if not faster motion?
because in my research, for instance, small amounts of mass do not perturb orbits.
Myles Standish had used data from Voyager 2's 1989 flyby of Neptune, which had revised the planet's total mass downward by 0.5%—an amount comparable to the mass of Mars
Just like cute discussions of Pluto now being a planetoid
I fail to see how that rules out a binary or anything else.