I looked at the website. A list of soundbites with a lot of misinformation and no substance. And you use this as your source of information?
For f#*k sake - I never said JackBlood.com was the source of all truth and knowledge, in fact it's just one site on a long list of sites I know
about.
I was referring to the two articles I posted which the author had researched.
He has looked into the registration details of those sites and posted the details on his site - you can see all the technical details like IP
addresses/etc on the pages.
Why are you trying to continually debase this information?? I couldn't care less what he wrote on the rest of his site because I haven't read it.
Please keep the discussion to the two articles I posted and not the site.
If you buy a magazine, say about football, and you read it from cover to rear do you agree 100% with everything written in it - of course you
wouldn't and you probably wouldn't even read all of it!!
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by jlife
I've been coming to this web site for about a year and a half (without ever posting before)
Would you like to re-examine that statement? You should have the opportunity to correct your mis-statements.
In plain english for you to understand then?? OK, here goes...
I have been visiting this web site for about one and a half years and only recently made my first post.
When visiting I mean I have been browsing the topics and not making any posts and therefore not taking part in any discussions (is that plain enough
for you??).
About a week (or two) ago I posted a message and that was my first and only post until today.
There! Do you follow or would you llike more clarification??