It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IandEye
Reply to post by Sinter Klaas
what does that have to do with gay marriage?
or is this thread actually about incest and I misread the title?
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by WolfofWar
If banning gay marriage is unconstitutional, should banning bigamy and polygamy also be unconstitutional as well?
Originally posted by IandEye
its cute when people try and create love in this world but what a futile effort. only god can do that.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by jtma508
The key is 'unrelated'. There are serious genetic perils related to inter-marriage. This puts children of the marriage at-risk and can put the larger society at-risk as a result.
Originally posted by Annee
BUT - - legalizing this would require clarifications on laws/tax laws.
Its far more complicated then extending Equal Rights to a couple.
Originally posted by fred call
What with cloning and advanced understanding of the DNA altering, we don't know if this ancient wives' tale holds water anymore.
So here is a bit of a sticky situation.
Originally posted by acid1789
Originally posted by jtma508
The key is 'unrelated'. There are serious genetic perils related to inter-marriage. This puts children of the marriage at-risk and can put the larger society at-risk as a result.
This is a completely separate issue IMO. We are discussing marriage here, not procreation. Currently homosexual couples do not procreate with each other, they seek alternative means if they want children. The same could be done for related couples.
Originally posted by earthdude
Children and animals cannot give an adult consent for sex. The other things mentioned are not related to sexual preference and not without victims. Very simple. Apples and oranges. Let the gays get married, it won't hurt you or anybody else. Make the laws repect actions.
I looked it up for YOU.
Originally posted by Annee
First cousins can legally marry in many states. Look it up.
Only immediately family blood relatives can not marry - because of incest laws.
Originally posted by intrepid
I don't think there is anything wrong with plural marriage. I would think the man should be tested for his mental capabilities though. Who would want or could tolerate more than one spouse?
Now here's a concept that hasn't been thought of. What if a man wanted a wife AND a husband? This ought to be interesting.
its cute when people try and create love in this world but what a futile effort. only god can do that.
what does that have to do with gay marriage?
or is this thread actually about incest and I misread the title?