Afghanistan war logs: Massive leak of secret files exposes truth of occupation, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 160 times


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 01:45 AM by Chriswok
www.bbc.co.uk...

Link the BBC, an article 22 July showing the increased number of drone attacks. A small relation to today's wikileaks.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 03:15 AM by JohnJasper
Originally posted by Chriswok
The cynic in me says wikileaks sit on this info for as long as they can, drumming up interest and hype before selling the information on to Newspaper.

Its great the leaks are coming out, but its a shame that even this 'freedom act' of wikileaks evolves around money. I doubt the whistleblowers see any of it.


So, you went from your cynical inner-voice telling you that Wiki is "selling" this information to Wikileaks "evolves [sic] around money." (I'm guessing that you meant "revolves")

As the Wikileaks main pages are unobtainable at the moment (no doubt to a sudden surge in interest), perhaps this
article will help confirm that

- they don't sell the information

- they manage the release of information for a number of reasons none of which includes their own profit. It does include:
- validating the authenticity of the information
- protecting the source of the information
- de-personalising information e.g. credit card numbers, addresses, PINS, SSNs
- pre-release notification of affected parties
- allowing selected news agencies exclusive access to make it worth the agencies while to do some of the expensive authentication work and offset any attempts to minimise the release.

- they completely rely on donations to fund their operation and even then they're particular about who they accept donations from.

For further insight, watch this youtube video,


[edit on 26-7-2010 by JohnJasper]

[edit on 26-7-2010 by JohnJasper]


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 03:25 AM by franspeakfree
reply to post by JohnJasper



Not to mention that any money made out of this will go towards helping the 'hero' (in my book) Bradley Manning who without his gallant efforts, the world would not be waking up and reading about the atrocities that have taken place and kept secret for so long from the people who are force fed war propaganda bull# everyday!

We should all raise our glasses to Bradley Manning - God knows what he is going through at this moment in time.

[edit on 26-7-2010 by franspeakfree]


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 03:55 AM by TheOracle
reply to post by curioustype



Oh I think there are more
If I ran such a site, I would not give all the information I have at once, just so the interest doesn't fade away.
I say expect more explosive revelations from WL


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 04:31 AM by Reign02
reply to post by Peruvianmonk



none of this is anything new or exciting really... All UAVs are flown from Nellis AFB in Nevada, the Taliban has had SAM capabilities for a long time, and finally someone talks about them killing civilians and not us....


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 04:40 AM by OptimusPrimate
reply to post by pavil





Hey Mr Afgani, protecting your land and your family, watching day by day as our coalitions invasion of your sovreign country actually causes more radicalisation than it prevents....here take a cowards shot from above from one of our drones...have a nice day.

Its a pity your country is so strategically important and resource rich to the Neo cons otherwise we would have left you well alone.

Say hi to Osama for us will ya? I hope he was happy with the dialisis we provided for him.

Turn the tables for a moment would you? Some guy has been deemed a terrorist, who allegedly has links with your country, you are all then labeled terrorists for defending your land...on a monkeys say so.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 05:02 AM by Peruvianmonk
reply to post by Reign02



Yes people like us have been aware of this kind of thing for a while. But when reported on the news to 'regular' folk it may turn even more of the public in the U.S., U.K., and others involved in the conflict against it.

As Mr Aftergood puts it.

Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation for American Scientists' Project on Government Secrecy, told the Post. They [the public] want greater clarity and greater candor than they have gotten up to this point. Wikileaks, in this case, has filled a void left by the Pentagon.


www.guardian.co.uk...

For me the Guardian Newspaper in Britian is a pretty left wing. Not quite as much as the Independent but if there is ever a reason to crictise the Foreign Policy of the West they will not shy away from doing so.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^