Afghanistan war logs: Massive leak of secret files exposes truth of occupation, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 160 times


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:21 PM by hippomchippo
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
reply to
post by hippomchippo



I have reason to believe that Assange has it, along with photos, video and equally damning evidence of export and import operations as well as distribution inside the USA., an outline and evidence of the criminal alliances between the US military, CIA and other federal agencies etc... This would have been a major story... BUT?

I should say HAD it, obviously they don't now.

In my opinion of course.




There are 'other' ways.

Based on what?
And if he does have it, perhaps he's releasing it incrementally like others have suggested?


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:30 PM by XPLodER
reply to post by jerico65



ex linky

www.guardian.co.uk...

video on subject please watch

xploder



reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:35 PM by Fractured.Facade
reply to post by hippomchippo



If it was going to happen, it would have NOW.

Not going to come out from Wikileaks.

They are 100% under control.

Anything they release now will be designed and intended to meet specific objectives, either politically or for intelligence gathering, data mining and tracking of anonymous contributors.

But hey, don't take my word for it.

Just wait and see.


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:36 PM by Visitor2012
reply to post by pavil



"I'm confused.....were supposed to arrest and try the Taliban as we fight them in a war? Personally I just prefer we kill them in engagements.......we are still allowed to fight them aren't we??? Just want to make sure it's acceptable to fire at them. I also see no problem in killing Taliban with Drones so we don't have to risk coalition troops. "

Are you joking or are you insane? You seem to relish in this evil, like you're a part of it.


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:37 PM by SUICIDEHK45
reply to post by DOADOA



I think you are right, this is just another attempt to keep the U.S. involved in Afghanistan as long as possible. The 300 important items aren't really secrets or very important. It just "proves" that the U.S. presence is justified.



reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:40 PM by ExPostFacto
reply to post by Peruvianmonk



How the coalition is increasingly using deadly Reaper drones to hunt and kill Taliban targets by remote control from a base in Nevada.

The above I thought was fairly common knowledge.


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:41 PM by XPLodER
reply to post by Roadie



But US pilot logs show they were certain the missile was not an RPG and was most likely a Manpad – the military term for a shoulder-launched surface-to-air missile. "Witness statements from Chalk 3 [another aircraft] suggest Flipper was struck by Manpad," it reads.

Those fears were confirmed by two Apache attack helicopters hovering over the crash site that came under fire from more missiles, twice in 30 minutes. Both missiles missed, and the pilots subsequently reported that they were "not an RPG" but a "probable first-generation MANPAD".

"Clearly the Taliban were attempting to down an Apache after downing the CH-47," it read.

The crash and its handling highlight steadily escalating US worries amid a stream of intelligence reports, also captured in the files, that suggest the Taliban were being supplied with missiles from Iran and Pakistan.

One internal report in September 2005 warned that Taliban commanders in Zabul and Kandahar provinces had acquired missiles they called "number two Stinger", for about $1,000 (£650) each. Nine months later came the first of at least


ex linky
www.guardian.co.uk...

your tax dollars are allowing opium sales that buy stigers @ $1000 dollars that destroy multimillion dollar choppers and kill your boys

war is for profit not security

not your profit not your security


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:44 PM by jerico65
Originally posted by XPLodER
www.guardian.co.uk...

video on subject please watch

xploder


I stopped watching as soon as this ass-hat said the leaks cover the entire war from 2004 on.

Hmmmm....funny, US Forces have been in the Ghan since 2001. Guess his accuracy is a bit off.


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:45 PM by XPLodER
reply to post by sdcigarpig



the only way war crimes are bought to justice is when they are exposed

all material is screened to ensure no active duty staff are comprimised

this is clasified because its a crime not to protect the troops

watch the video from wiki about the release


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:49 PM by XPLodER
reply to post by jerico65



lol im sure you understand that the releases cover that time period not the entire war

please remeber crimes are commited by the military and only hidden under the label national security

read the docs buddy


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 08:55 PM by Xcathdra
Originally posted by wcitizen
Bravo Wikileaks, and bravo to the absolutely amazing courage of whistleblowers. They are true Heros.

US replies with same old, same old. Putting them and their buddies at risk.
Never mind the abominable risk they are to Afghans. Never mind the mass murder of children and civilians which they are deliberately carrying out.

9/11 was a terrorist attack carried out by the US Government on its own people. The Afghan war is illegal. US and its allies are therefore carrying out terrorist activities in these countries.

The Taliban are old buddies of Obama (aka Soreto, aka God knows who).
The US is possibly even now providing them with weapons, as they did in the past, (via Obama as agent in the field), to keep the conflict alive.

THE US GOVERNMENT are the ones who are putting US military and Afghan citizens at risk in an act of terrorism against Afghanistan.

The heroic whistleblowers and Wikileaks are trying to STOP this insanity.

The NaZionists who run US and international politics are the CRIMINALS, whose ony concern is to protect themselves. They are blatantly not interested in protecting anyone else.


Yes by all means lets demozie US forces. Lets overlook all of the civilian Deaths at the hands of the Taliban in the name of religion. While I have absolutely no problem holding our leaders / military accountible I ask this:

Who holds the Taliban accountible? Al Queda? Its hard to not have civilian casualties when the Taliban / Al Queda use schools and mosques to fight from.

Also bare in mind that just because wiki discloses information, its entirely possible they dont have ALL of the information.


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 09:01 PM by XPLodER
reply to post by Xcathdra



be careful the disinfo agents will be going nuts trying to defend this illegal imoral war founded on lies

1 billion for pakastan to train insurgents to kill us soilders

TREASON is what it is
dont defend treason that is a criminal act

the troops dont decide anything and are not at fault

the eleits that profit from war are the problem



[edit on 25-7-2010 by XPLodER]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags