It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by coldfiremx
reply to post by soleprobe
I honestly don't think **** would lie to me about it if I asked questions, he already knows that I am questioning the events that have occured. When he gets pictures i'll tell him to get landmarks in the background and take pics of GPS coordinates. He won't be shipped out untill next month but I will at least get some pictures to post.
Originally posted by LAinhabitant
reply to post by soleprobe
That is not a real page for Shuttles.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Great theory. One question then: where did all that oil all over the gulf come from then? Videos of flyovers clearly show a profusion of oil slicks and sick or dying animals. The oil is REAL and there's LOTS OF IT, unfortunately.
An oil slick, caused by a spill from a Hong Kong-registered oil tanker on Friday, has been washing up since Saturday along a 12-mile-long shoreline of South Korea's west coast.
Photo: Reuters
Originally posted by westcoast
While I agree that something very odd and secretive is going on, I don't think you can go so far as to say that there is NO oil spill. As others have pointed out, you can't fabricate NASA satellite images of oil covering the gulf and all the other images asociated with it.
I have another theory.
I think that BP has hit a 'stream' of abiotic hydrocarbon. I don't want to hijack your thread, so if anyone wants to read about it further you can read my thread called The MOHO; has BPdrilled into it?
I think you may have some valid points...but I don't think it's rationale to say there isn't a leak. If anything, it is so much worse than they can ever let us know. More importantly, they can't let us know that they hit a renewable well. The consequences would be incredible for the world market.
[edit on 20-7-2010 by westcoast]
Originally posted by nataylor
And of course www.dougsuttles.com isn't owned or operated by Doug Suttles. Do you have any evidence it is, other than they use his name in the domain name? The web site doesn't even claim it's controlled by Doug Suttles.
Originally posted by DJW001
Just one tiny little question... why would BP "fake" the biggest environmental disaster in history, knowing that their stock shares would plummet