It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Someone336
reply to post by JonInMichigan
Um, lazy stoners? I have payed for everything I have ever owned, including my education.
I have a healthy respect for the markets; they are the force that allows us to be something other than a stone-age society.
However...
When 1% of the GDP is executive bonuses, something is wrong.
When mega-corporations get ridiculous tax-breaks and bail-outs at taxpayers expenses, we are working in a broken system.
When our government destroys small business with sanctioned monopolies (corporations), wealth cannot and will never be properly distributed according to the whims of the market.
With our defense budget, we could alleviate world hunger.
With a universal currency to do business end, we could end our necessary trade deficit and rebuilding our economy.
With tariffs, a progressive income tax, and no imperialistic designs, we could build towards the ideas displayed in the Second Bill of Rights.
When 1% of the GDP is executive bonuses, something is wrong.
The Second Bill of Rights is not a Utopian, pie-in-the-sky dream. It could easily be reality, if we only saw past the lenses of greed.
yeah. The system is borked. I'll give you that. Take it back to the constituion as it was intended. It's not a sin to be rich
(if you do it honestly)
You talk about ending world hunger? BS. The countries that are in that state are keeping the food from their people.
86 the defense budget? they would only take what you could see and that would put us in a bad position.
Respect only comes with Strength. Period. Thats why were laughed at since Reagan.
Tariffs? Good idea.
Progressive taxation? Bad idea. They pass the cost to the consumer and the price goes up to compensate.
Originally posted by dreamseeker
Originally posted by ZuluChaka
reply to post by dreamseeker
What is next?
A right to internet and cable tv and hand lotion?
So we have all that we need, then who is going to actually work to provide it to us?
Now that sounds ridculous. Everyone has a right to live. Having shelter and food is not a luxery. I really thought most people on ats would agree with this. Most people on here are about rights; or is it just "their" rights?
All of you who agree with the guy who gave us the great Depression.... read the Bill of Rights, and let me know, or please list in a reply, all of the rights mentioned there which place a burden on other citizens. I'll help you out; there aren't any!
Originally posted by Someone336
reply to post by felonius
yeah. The system is borked. I'll give you that. Take it back to the constituion as it was intended. It's not a sin to be rich
(if you do it honestly)
Oh, I agree entirely that it is not a sin to be rich. I hope to be rich someday! Pretty odd for such a big leftist, but I do believe in the market, incentives, etc.
You talk about ending world hunger? BS. The countries that are in that state are keeping the food from their people.
The reason third world countries are in such a crap-hole is because we keep pushing the idea, via neo-liberal organizations such as the World Bank, et. al., that free market economics are what builds economies out of poverty. This was not true for America, nor was it true for any proclaimed "free-market miracle" (Chile, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan) out there. What we should be doing is investing in temporary state-planned economics in these countries; it is the most efficient way to build a nation.
86 the defense budget? they would only take what you could see and that would put us in a bad position.
Respect only comes with Strength. Period. Thats why were laughed at since Reagan.
I'm not for eliminating the entire defense budget; however, it is bloated and easily eclipses all other aspects of our spending. The majority flows into the coffers of corrupt defense contracting corporations, in the sinister system that Eisenhower dubbed the 'military-industrial complex', a quasi-capitalist system that defies free markets due to government selection for contracts based on undeniable cronyism. You may complain about your tax dollars going to public healthcare, but I will damn well complain about my tax dollars funding civilian deaths in the Middle East, dead American soldiers in foreign lands, and swank summer destination homes for CEOs.
Reagan's policies turned the entire world against us and made us lose so much respect on the world stage. That is what happens when you topple countries with reckless abandon just because your God-given system of democracy works against you. We have no business funding, training, and running networks of assassins, drug smugglers and death squads. Utter nonsense.
Tariffs? Good idea.
Progressive taxation? Bad idea. They pass the cost to the consumer and the price goes up to compensate.
In a system where corporations are reduced in size, competition would still maintain lower price regardless of the innovation of the progress income tax. Progressive income tax would also serve to even the playing field, so to speak, which is really what is also essential for a functioning market.
It is the great equalizer, if we allow it to be.
Originally posted by undinemyth
reply to post by dreamseeker
Well hon, you sound A LOT younger than 35. I figured you were at most 23.