U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions…

page: 8
85
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 12:48 PM
link   
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
 




The South Carolina Immunization Project
Immunization Rates Bolstered by Public-Private Partnerships. The Palmetto Project’s nationally recognized approach to raising immunization rates continued to boost the state’s national leadership status in 2005.

Our approach is to develop community-based, public-private partnerships to increase the number of South Carolina children who are fully immunized and reduce the number of school days missed by students for failure to be up-to-date with their shots. State law requires school administrators to deny admission to children who are behind in their immunizations. Day care providers are under similar restrictions.


SC Immunization

As I said, my state requires vaccinations. I don't know about yours.

I will ask you again, not to imply that I am intentionally posting false information. It is a personal attack and one which I take umbrage to.




posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 01:27 PM
link   
reply to post by mothershipzeta
 


Yes you can find it in that bill! It's covered Here

Specifically I believe the sections they would use to enforce this would be

4103 under the terms of the "Annual Wellness Visit"

and

4204-3-e specifically dealing with immunization

Sorry for the lack of pointing you to the actual bill. Typically when subjects are brought here before ATS I like to assume that unless debunked they stand. This is one big bill I would personally like to see completely fly out the _ After scanning through the actual wording again, I find that the stench of socialism reeks more after sitting for a few months.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 01:32 PM
link   
reply to post by PayMeh
 


*sigh*

South Carolina Vaccine Exemption

Gosh, that was hard! I had to do an entire 5 seconds of Google searching to show that you are either lying or willfully ignorant.

Note that you can either get a religious exemption (which can apply to any religion you choose, even if you aren't ACTUALLY a member) or a medical exemption (which is simply asking a doctor to sign the form, which most physicians have no problem doing).

[edit on 6/28/2010 by VneZonyDostupa]



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 02:29 PM
link   
I'd be sharing a cell or a slab with some other ATS members, depending on how hard the medi-nazis wanted to push me, and how many there were doing the pushing.

At least I'd be in good company!

The only way they could package this would be to stage some kind of national or regional health emergency, ala "Outbreak", only with some flu strain instead of Ebola Zaire. Something to use as a scare tactic and justification for forced inoculations, with the additional flourish of a declared national emergency.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 02:54 PM
link   
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
 


Why are you so hellbent on calling me a liar? How would you like it if I called you a G*dd**n government shill based on your title in your avatar and the fact you're posting on a medical topic thread? I could continue to assume that you work for some big pharm corporation with a vested interest in forced vaccinations and are trying to derail this thread. It would just not be polite at all to do so.

Personally, I don't care if there is a way to opt out or not. My ****** bad. The fact of the matter is that the administration will tell you that you have no choice. The link I gave sets the tone that any state official will give you. I know, because I've already had this fight with the ******* state. So how dare you call me ignorant or a liar.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by PayMeh
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
 


Why are you so hellbent on calling me a liar? How would you like it if I called you a G*dd**n government shill based on your title in your avatar and the fact you're posting on a medical topic thread? I could continue to assume that you work for some big pharm corporation with a vested interest in forced vaccinations and are trying to derail this thread. It would just not be polite at all to do so.

Personally, I don't care if there is a way to opt out or not. My ****** bad. The fact of the matter is that the administration will tell you that you have no choice. The link I gave sets the tone that any state official will give you. I know, because I've already had this fight with the ******* state. So how dare you call me ignorant or a liar.


The difference between what I have called you and what you have called me, is that I have evidence. I haven't made a single claim that contradicts reality.

You, on the other hand, have gone from claiming "VACCINES ARE MANDATORY, OH MY GOD IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD" to "well, so what if they aren't...they MIGHT be someday! And just look at the 'tone' of the article!"

So, essentially, you are just moving the goal posts anytime you are proven wrong. You claimed they are mandatory, I showed you they are not. So now, you've decided to play 'predict the future' and claim that they MIGHT be some day, and that 'the administration' (as if vaccines and vaccination schedules were invented by Obama) is 'going' (not currently, but 'going', as if you can see the future) to tell us they are mandatory.

Can you see now why I think your posts are full of lies, or just plain ignorant? You ignore easily found evidence that contradicts your points, and then change the subject and claim to predict the future.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by PayMeh
Again, with the new Obamacare comes big perks for big pharm. I don't see how they can even think about enforcing this. As much as they argue that failure to accept the vaccination is harmful to my health, I can assure you that my molten lead is much more hazardous to theirs should they try and enforce this upon me.


That is the irony of a lot of this.

We are paying taxes so that we can have our rights taken away.

We are paying taxes so that corporations can make billions in
profit off gov contracts while 40+ million are on foodstamps.

We are paying taxes to fund 700+ bases in 130+ countries
so we can play world police for the round table groups
like CFR, Bilderberg, Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission.

We are paying taxes so that some muppets in robes can tell us
the 2nd amendment is ok "for now".

We are paying taxes so that senators can run a prostitution ring
from their home partially with tax payer money.

We are paying taxes so that billionaire banksters can have
millionaire dollar bonuses while unemployment in some
areas has passed even Michigan.



[edit on 28-6-2010 by Ex_MislTech]



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 03:28 PM
link   
I've suddenly developed an "egg" allergy... so has every member of my family. I think all of you have too. Oh my, it's a egg allergy epidemic.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 03:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by PayMeh
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
 


Why are you so hellbent on calling me a liar? How would you like it if I called you a G*dd**n government shill based on your title in your avatar and the fact you're posting on a medical topic thread? I could continue to assume that you work for some big pharm corporation with a vested interest in forced vaccinations and are trying to derail this thread. It would just not be polite at all to do so.

Personally, I don't care if there is a way to opt out or not. My ****** bad. The fact of the matter is that the administration will tell you that you have no choice. The link I gave sets the tone that any state official will give you. I know, because I've already had this fight with the ******* state. So how dare you call me ignorant or a liar.


I think you will find here on ATS some ppl post JUST to upset ppl.

They think it is funny.

The term used for them on the internet is a troll.

en.wikipedia.org...(Internet)

He may be a Eugenics-genocide supporter wanting to cull
the masses of ppl who are not as perfect as him like those
who had the Georgia Guidestones up.

He may be one of those ppl that cheered professor Pianka when
he called for a bioweapon to kill off 90% of the planet.

He could be a fan of our current science czar who calls for
forced mass sterlization of the public in his co-authored book Ecoscience.

Or...

He is just a troll.

Hard to tell these days what animal you are dealing with.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 03:53 PM
link   
This is only a recommendation.

It is not a requirement.

It will still be up to individuals to make this decision.

Personally, I get my flu vaccine almost every year and almost never get sick.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Ex_MislTech
 


Or SHE (not he) could just be someone who ACTUALLY READ THE ARTICLE IN THE OP and realises that this is a CDC recommendation, not a mandatory plan or forced vaccinations.

Does ANYONE here know how to read?



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 04:40 PM
link   
Let them try to enforce it.

The Second Amendment was re-affirmed today.

This is a extreemly importiant issue to me. A nurse attempted to give my son 7 vaccines in one day while he had a fever. Having been a firefighter EMT and Knowing the risk, I have chosen not to have any vaccines done.

This issue is a line in the sand for me as well as others. They do not want to force this on the American People.

They are many of us out there that are ready and willing to protect our loved ones from Big Government and Big Pharma.

Don't Tread On Me, It's a Warning not to be taken lightly.

Our Forefathers fought and won a revolution for much less.

A decision like this strikes at the very heart of freedom. Every man, woman and child in this republic have a right to be secure in their person. This is just one more nail in the coffin of liberty. I will not allow any member of my family to be forced in to taking any vaccine. I do not care what laws they may pass to force it upon us.

I would rather die on on my feet fighting for the freedom of others, than live as a slave.

Molon Labe!

Come and take it!



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 05:54 PM
link   
I can't see this happening. There's no way they could force anyone to have it, unless they send armed troops round to ever individuals house! And if that happens your gun laws might just come in handy


I remember last year when the UK government send out flyers to every home asking people to go and get the swine/bird flu jab (can't remember which - both massively overblown crap to earn the pharmaceutical companies billions), something like 5% of the population actually went and got it done.

This is just more government wishful thinking that they can get the population to do whatever they want... how they wrong they are!



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:17 PM
link   
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
 



In your last response to me, you repeatedly asked me for sources for my statements that the swine flu vaccine is harmful to human health and has caused deaths and serious diseases in people. I ASSUMED you would have already been well aware of these issues since you claimed to be involved with the medical industry! You also ask for sources for my statement that many health professionals are advising against the vaccine. Again I am stunned at your ignorance, if you are REALLY a health care professional, and not just a professional internet salesman for very bad ideas.

The fact that YOU ARE NOT AWARE of these issues leads me to believe (a) you are either severely indoctrinated into the propaganda of your institution such that you are oblivious to what is actually happening, or (b) you really HAVE seen this information before and are simply peddling on behalf of the big money and government behind these vaccines and are a petty shill.


Don't shoot the messenger.

This is what you are apparently unaware of, my uninformed friend:




"Girl took (swine) flu shot and ended up getting Dystonia"

If you can't watch the video, the girl can hardly even walk anymore and is basically crippled after taking the vaccine. She is being interviewed by a local news station.



Swine flu jab link to killer nerve disease: Leaked letter reveals concern of neurologists over 25 deaths in America

A warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.

The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.

It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the vaccine.

GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability to breathe, and can be fatal.

The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29, is the first sign that there is concern at the highest levels that the vaccine itself could cause serious complications.

It refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the United States in 1976 when:

* More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu.
* 500 cases of GBS were detected.
* The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times.
* The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS became clear.
* The US Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to those affected.


Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not been sufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, are unknown.

It is being developed by pharmaceutical companies and will be given to about 13million people during the first wave of immunisation, expected to start in October.

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... tml#ixzz0sC07pB9l


[edit on 28-6-2010 by AquariusDescending]



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by highlyoriginal
 


I hope they don't forget to mention the MERCURY that is also added to vaccines designed to destroy brain tissue. And some would ask, why would they do that. Could it be part of The New World Order government and a de-population programme for all????



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
 


Let's continue on with some more sources for things you are presently ignorant of and even incorrectly deny, lest you continue to ask "Source please?" when I state these things that EVERY HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL should KNOW about these vaccines.


Risks of the Swine Flu Vaccine

The coming swine flu vaccination campaign is expected to begin in October. But with vaccine safety tests being fast-tracked under “public health emergency” rules and the use of some questionable ingredients, many health experts are warning about a myriad of risks associated with the vaccine and the importance of being educated.

“Right now, you need to become educated about vaccination, influenza, vaccine risks and the public health laws in your state,” warned Barbara Loe Fisher, the president of the National Vaccine Information Center. “You need to find out what your rights and options are under new public health laws that may require you — and your children — to be vaccinated or quarantined.


Let me stop halfway through this excerpt to throw in -- "I TOLD YOU SO."

You keep saying, oh you have a right, they can't make you, (right SO FAR), and then you even go so far as to say they haven't even been SUGGESTING such a thing. Well read it and cry, or get over yourself, because you are sadly mistaken. I remember this kind of talk last year. The word "quarantine" here is all too familiar now that I see it again. But you must not have thought this was real, did you? The rest of the excerpt I'll quote:


So what are the risks of the swine flu vaccines? It depends on who you ask.

“There can be no argument that unnecessary mass injection of millions of children with a vaccine containing an adjuvant known to cause a host of debilitating autoimmune diseases is a reckless, dangerous plan,” explained Dr. Joseph Mercola, a health activist, author and strong critic of the swine flu immunization program. He proceeds to provide evidence justifying his concerns.

The adjuvant Mercola is referring to is based on an oil known as squalene. It is used to reduce the amount of viral antigen required in vaccines, which allows companies to produce more vaccines for less money at a faster rate.

But according to countless medical professionals and experts, using it in immunizations is a bad idea. It is also going to be somewhat experimental. There isn’t a single vaccine containing squalene that is approved for use in America, according to Meryl Nass, M.D., who notes that Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline will make use of it as a “novel feature of the H1N1 vaccines.”


www.thenewamerican.com...\



Warning: Swine Flu Shot Linked to Killer Nerve Disease

As mentioned in this article, the 1976 swine flu vaccine campaign caused more harm than good, and there are indications that the current campaign may end up being a devastating repeat or worse.

At that time, one person died from the actual swine flu, while 25 people died from adverse reactions to the vaccine, and several hundred people developed crippling Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

According to The Daily Mail, the British Health Protection Agency sent letters to 600 neurologists on July 29th, warning them to be on the lookout for cases of Guillain- Barré Syndrome once the swine flu vaccine campaign begins.

Why the warning was not sent out to general practitioners, who will be administering the shot, seems an odd choice if public safety is indeed the main concern.

This confidential correspondence between the British public health agency and neurologists in the U.K. is the first clue that all is probably not well with this fast-tracked pandemic vaccine.


articles.mercola.com...



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
 


But wait, Mr. Know-It-All, there's more!


Doctors told to watch for Guillain-Barre syndrome during Swine flu vaccination programme

Doctors are being urged to watch for cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare nerve disorder, as the new swine flu vaccine is introduced in October.

Guillain-Barre syndrome which attacks the nervous system and can cause paralysis and death is linked to infections like flu but it has also been suggested a previous swine flu vaccine had caused cases of the disease in America in the 1970s.

American officials rushed out a vaccine in 1976 following an outbreak of swine flu in military barracks. Around 40million people received the vaccine but doctors reported an increase Guillain-Barre and 25 people had died before the immunisation programme was stopped.

It is not known for sure whether the vaccine or the flu was responsible and the current H1N1 swine flu jabs due to be introduced in Britain in October are very different to the version used thirty years ago, Government scientists have said.

However specialist doctors here are being urged to report every case of Guillain-Barre syndrome to the Health Protection Agency so the circumstances of each patient can be investigated.


www.telegraph.co.uk...


Enough of the UK government warning people, let's turn to the World Heath Organization (WHO) now. You've heard of THEM, haven't you doc?
Surely they, being a world authority and therefore pretty "mainstream," might inject some common sense into all these nonsense fears?



Vaccine for swine flu may be unsafe warns WHO

The Department of Health plans to make the vaccine available at least two months earlier than in America.

More than 132million doses have been ordered with the first batch due to arrive next month.

However, Dr Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's flu chief, today warned about the potential dangers of the untested vaccine: "There are certain areas where you simply do not try to make any economies. One of the things which cannot be compromised is the safety of vaccines."

The European Medicines Agency, the drug regulatory body for the EU, is accelerating the approval process for the vaccine, allowing firms to bypass large-scale human trials and instead test a vaccine based on bird flu.

Countries including Britain, Greece, France and Sweden plan to start using it as soon as it is cleared.

The Department of Health said it was "extremely irresponsible" to suggest Britain would use an unsafe vaccine. A spokesman said: "Over 40,000 doses of the vaccine which the swine flu vaccines are based on have been given without any safety concerns."


www.thisislondon.co.uk...


There is mercury in it, there are many other "ingredients" in it that SHOULD NEVER be injected into a human's bloodstream for any "health" reason. Blind faith in these authorities amounts to faith in the medieval church, except with much more dire consequences on the table than simple ignorance and idiocy. One on side of the industry, people are making millions/billions of dollars. On the opposite end of the industry, millions of people are having their immune systems and nervous systems attacked and are being put at very serious risk -- with talk of even making it MANDATORY during an outbreak deemed severe enough by our honorable government officials, and even QUARANTINE.

I also told you that German government officials were offered a separate vaccine than what the general public was to receive, with some of the most questionable ingredients suddenly removed from THEIR vaccines. WHAT GIVES WITH THAT, DOC?!?

"Source, please?" What a smart aleck you are.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:42 PM
link   
Lets get on this fast people, let the polititions know that they , or anybody has the right to make you put anything in your body. It would have to be voluntary. No exceptions.
I beleive all the shouting kicking and screaming last fall all over the net had a great effect in them trying to make flu shots manditory last fall. IT SHOT THAT DOWN FAST!!!!!!



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hypntick
Never had a flu vaccine, oddly enough i've also never had the flu. Wonder if there is a connection there.

They could never enforce this. I agree with the other posters that i'd be in a cell with you. Although I don't think i'd even make it to a cell, they can force you if you're in a cell. They'd have to get ahold of me first.


Martial law will be next inline to play out for those who choose to disagree with vaccines. I for one do not like the idea of Martial law being enforced but it's not rocket-science to actually imagine that it is posiible as if like you said you'd make a stand which millions world-wide should then the President would in no hesitation state a declare of state emergency and declare Martial law.



posted on Jun, 28 2010 @ 06:50 PM
link   
Maybe this is the terrible thing which is slated to happen according to the kiss and tell warning from Dark 4 Kn1ght?

remember he warned anyone who would listen to get as far away from society before 11/28/11 or become part of one of the most gruesome attempts to control and irradicate the human population...

If these injections cause auditory and visual hallucinations, if it is a way for HARP type technologies to invade peoples very core of being in ways unimaginable and even cause them to kill each other...

Just thinking.






new topics
top topics
 
85
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join