U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions…, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 85 times
Topic started on 27-6-2010 @ 04:08 AM by highlyoriginal

U.S. government panel now pushing "vaccinations for all!" No exceptions…



An advisory panel to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that every person be vaccinated for the seasonal flu yearly, except in a few cases where the vaccine is known to be unsafe.

"Now no one should say 'Should I or shouldn't I?'" said CDC flu specialist Anthony Fiore.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted 11-0 with one abstention to recommend yearly flu vaccination for everyone except for children under the age of six months, whose immune systems have not yet developed enough for vaccination to be safe, and people with egg allergies or other health conditions that are known to make flu vaccines hazardous. If accepted by the CDC, this recommendation will then be publicized to doctors and other health workers.

The CDC nearly always accepts the advisory committee's recommendations.

Source

First off, this headline stuck out to me right away, this is ludicrous! And as I'm reading the article I see this line "...except in a few cases where the vaccine is known to be unsafe" - A few cases?

I have done a lot of research into the vaccinations that have been given out in the past few years, and some of the people who had to take them or felt the need to because of their families (such as pregnant women), had a lot of adverse reactions.

In one of the threads I made I posted an article that had interviewed a ton of pregnant women who got the bird flu vaccination and had miscarriages within hours of the vaccination. That is sickening - and to think that this sort of stuff may be FORCED upon us all is even worse!

Who knows what vaccinations we will "need" in the upcoming future - who knows what will actually be in these vaccinations - who knows if these vaccinations will be safe for most people (other than the people who will be excluded for health reasons)?

I am posting this in the breaking political news area because it truly is breaking news. This is something that everyone needs to see NOW before it is too late! Hopefully enough people find out that the CDC is being influenced by the advisory committee, and who else knows, to force vaccinations upon us all!

I'm sure that if you do not get the vaccinations (if this does pass) you will be looked down upon in society, and not be allowed to do certain things. We knew this was coming - let's just hope it's something we can stop!

[edit on 27/6/2010 by highlyoriginal]


reply posted on 27-6-2010 @ 04:59 AM by highlyoriginal
Originally posted by PayMeh
As much as they argue that failure to accept the vaccination is harmful to my health, I can assure you that my molten lead is much more hazardous to theirs should they try and enforce this upon me.




True that

Obviously, as I said in the OP, this has been something that has been in the works for a while - it's something we've all talked about here on ATS before.

If they are finally coming out in the public and speaking like this though, then they obviously also have a plan to fulfill their objective and/or agenda(s).

We know the world population is large, and we know that it should be/needs to be reduced. However, that can happen over time if the right steps are implemented; there is no need to kill anyone off - slowly or not it's wrong, VERY VERY WRONG. Actually if you're going to force me to take 'vaccinations' that are harmful to me, you may as well just give me the same cocktail they give death row inmates at execution because I'd rather die fast than slow.

However, much like everyone else, I would NEVER accept this. I will fight for my freedoms as much as I humanly can... and then some! I would never accept a free vaccination (which is going to be the deal here if they enforce this onto the masses), let alone one I have to pay for.

I can bet you that they will start with the very sick, very poor, and homeless people first. They may even give out some actual good medication to some of those people to make it look like it's all safe and dandy, but we know that this is not the truth - at least in the long haul we know any vaccination can be harmful to you, regardless if it's been tampered with.

The whole point of this country and many others, is to be FREE. This is not freedom, this is becoming more and more like slavery. I know people would never allow themselves to be used as lab rats but is it really going to take that long [where we are fighting for our lives not to take said vaccines] for us all to do something about this???


reply posted on 27-6-2010 @ 05:31 AM by PayMeh
The real threat here isn't some covert government conspiracy to inject us with bad things intentionally. I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just saying there's a larger threat. I'll outline how things are falling into place.

1. Big pharmaceutical corps have had this thorn in their sides for years - the steps they have to take to deem their products "safe" for human consumption. They've found loopholes and been granted the rights to self regulate. The more disease and/or panic they can create, the more money they get to funnel into their bank accounts.

2. With the new Obamacare, there is a new found vested interest in the naive government shills to push for preventative measures.

3. Big pharm has been given the opportunity to create the demand for their products. It is at the heart of the matter a conflict of interest. If this measure comes to pass, they stand to not only double or triple their initial profits, but it also gives them incentive to increase the percentage of live virus vaccines.

This will create a perfect storm as it were. With the labs being able to deem their own products safe and the masses being forced to trust these entities, nothing stands in the way of these companies making an intentional "mistake" and double-dip-charging to fix any error their labs create.

The companies laugh all the way to the bank all while they sell more products to fix problems they initially caused. The implications could be huge - from mass pandemics to life long side effects requiring a barrage of new medications.

We have to understand that all oversight in this country is gone. Corporate bank accounts are safe. We the people are not safe. Go to Italy and you'll see bread shops, cheese shops, butcher shops with cured ham that's been hanging from the ceiling for two years. What do we have? Irradiated vegetables, chlorinated meats, chemical soaked everything.

We are being poisoned to save ourselves from being poisoned - all the while middle-men are being placed shoulder to shoulder between products and consumers. All for the love of money.

Edit to add: I have changed my stance from government officials having a set precise agenda to the conclusion that they are all just that stupid. I think BHO believes what he's been doing is "the right thing to do." Someone's sold him on these ideas. I think it has to do with the average person being pelted with sales pitches from the moment of birth. We've built up a tolerance and have decent BS meters. I don't think the elites do. It's like someone's told them their whole lives that Santa is real and they've never learned any better. Most have no grip on reality and are suffering from severe Marie Antoinette Syndrome.

[edit on 27-6-2010 by PayMeh]


reply posted on 27-6-2010 @ 06:07 AM by tjack
The CDC and WHO can "recommend" anything they'd like.

A recommendation does not equal mass forced vaccinations! Everybody take a deep breath and relax, it's a bit early to be gearing up and digging foxholes.

Not saying we won't eventually get there, just this isn't the "thing" we're waiting for....here's a couple dubious excerpts from the statement on CDC's very own website though, that do tie in with the premise that it's all about the $$

CDC Newsroom Press Release

The new recommendation seeks to remove barriers to influenza immunization and signals the importance of preventing influenza across the entire population.


Remove barriers? There were barriers? That's a strange comment, no?

The vote took place against a backdrop of incremental increases in the numbers and groups of people recommended for influenza vaccination in years past, and lessons learned from the world’s still ongoing first flu pandemic in 40 years.


Ahhh, see, they vote every year, guided by "lessons learned"? Riiiiight! More like guided by big pharm's influence over Washington.


Anyway, this is pretty juicy stuff, so good post! Just calm down all ready, folks! (I admire the spirit, though, keep that, we're gonna need it)


reply posted on 27-6-2010 @ 06:17 AM by Izarith
reply to post by highlyoriginal



Jesus Christopher Walken!

This is insanity, there is not even any News Swine flue pandemic propaganda hysteria and they are bushing this crap on people.....

Christ all mighty, Thank God I live in Mexico.

In Mexico you usually kill a doctor's whole family, including the cats and dogs, if your relative does not make it through an operation...there's no way in hell you could force a Mexican to get a jab if he don't wants to. <-------This is a joke BTW, Mexicans don't kill a whole doctor's family, incloding the cats and dog, if a relitive does not make it through an operation. At least not always.

But then again all the WHO has to do is offer free beer in exchange for a jab.....but still with the price of Tecate now a days it would not be profitable to do so..Meh I'm not worried.

[edit on 27-6-2010 by Izarith]


reply posted on 27-6-2010 @ 07:57 AM by ~Lucidity
reply to post by PayMeh


Not to get into any bipartisan bickering here, but did pharma make substantially more or less under the Bush Administration? I seem to remember a prescription drug program, some Rumsfeld ties to big pharma, and there probably a few more instances of alleged profiteering and manipulation of the markets in the cronies' favor. Do you think this is a continuation of more of the same?

I know that there must be only projections of what they might make the new healthcare programs, which as I understand it will take a few years to even kick in, but are there any best guesses?

And not to make light of this, or say that I can confirm or deny it's validity (not really the point here), but does anyone remember this from early in Bush's term? Bush Wants to Medicate America.


[edit on 27-6-2010 by ~Lucidity]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 3 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags