Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
1) The girl who developed dystonia was later shown to be a fraud.
For all the whining you do about my choice of sources (go figure that would be your line of attack -- you don't deserve to be a medical professional
and the fact that you are is one of the reasons I have no faith in your society anymore) your own source here is weak and doesn't prove a damned
thing. It's a smear on a diseased girl who may very well HAVE been misdiagnosed while suffering from mercury poisoning or anything else known to be
in those vaccines that are simultaneously known to be TOXIC. Maybe they failed to teach you during your education (wherever the hell you supposedly
received one) that mercury is a potentially fatal NEUROTOXIN. So what do you think is going to happen when you inject it into people in a vaccine?
It's suddenly going to be beneficial or even inconsequential to health?
If you want to smear this poor girl, a high school cheerleader for whom it would make no sense to stagger around as if crippled, by saying she really
has no problems and is faking this whole thing, can you do it with a more credible source than the personal blog
of a sarcastic asshole, who
apparently, by reading the rest of his blog, finds great enjoyment in constantly, immaturely ridiculing others?
2) Your "leaked letter" article claiming 25 deaths is from the Dailymail. As you likely haven't lived or vacationed in the UK (which is
apparent due to your choice of sources), you don't realze that this rag is the English equivalent to the American "National Enquirer". Its pages
are filled with celebrity gossip and half-true news articles. If you could, please find a more reputable source for these death statistics.
I did some research, and your comparison is completely invalid and you are seriously reaching for any excuse. I am beginning more and more to think
that you are a traitor to society and are spreading disinformation intentionally, and not out of simple ignorance. At best your ego needs deflating
because these issues are not your personal issues, and people HAVE died from these vaccines.
are not familiar with "The National Enquirer," but let's compare headlines from today:
"Migrants must get private healthcare: Firms told to provide foreign workers with insurance to take pressure off NHS"
"Ten 'Russian spies on deep cover assignments' held in New York FBI swoops"
"Armed robber takes 16 hostages in 3-hour bank siege"
"Heading home in shame: England's flops and their WAGs board plane back to UK... but Capello refuses to fall on his £6m-a-year sword"
I could go on. Notice, if you are able, that these are mainstream stories
and can all be verified by any other major mainstream media source
you choose. Now I'm not defending the "journalism" of mainstream media at all, but if you want to make a distinction at all between tabloids like
the National Enquirer and more credible MSM sources, please make the distinction here, that these are mainstream stories and this is a mainstream
Compare to National Enquirer:
"OKSANA SAYS MAD MEL PUNCHED HER TEETH OUT AND SHE HAS SECRET EVIDENCE TO PROVE IT!"
"SEX BANNED IN SPACE"
"BRITNEY'S SAD GAY CRUSH"
"OFFICAL [sic] POLICE DOCUMENTS: GORE SEX SCANDAL VICTIM"
This is the best you can do?
You attack the source -- with a obviously invalid comparison.
You asked for sources, I gave you MULTIPLE SOURCES, SAYING THE SAME THINGS!! Referencing UK government and also WHO officials. Like I said, you
are not competent enough to work in the medical profession if you can't accept this simple information, as you are a liability to public health
concerns. The express "head in the sand" has a basis here in physical reality after all, and you might want to give it a thought, if you actually