It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Karilla
Q1) This is for a spaceship, yes? What exactly are the "propellors" pushing against in the vacuum of space that will result in forward motion?
Q2) The sole purpose of a ship that needs no fuel would obviously be to travel vast distances, but what use is travelling vast distances if the ship needs sunlight to run? Surely the necessity of remaining close to a star at all time automatically rules out crossings of interstellar space?
It only needs to be lit with sunlight for a short amount of time. About as much as it needs to create a dense electron layer.
I showed them in the drawing, if you saw it, that they are not used to propel anything but there electromagnetism of the magnets on each "propeller" to push the object which contains the electron layer at slow speeds but keeps the electrons moving because of the magnetic fields they create. Not only does it do that but it keeps the object which contains the carbon nanotubes away from floating off into space.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
It only needs to be lit with sunlight for a short amount of time. About as much as it needs to create a dense electron layer.
Exactly *how* efficient do you think carbon nanotubes are? You're certainly giving them more credit than they deserve.
I showed them in the drawing, if you saw it, that they are not used to propel anything but the electromagnetism of the magnets on each "propeller" to push the object which contains the electron layer at slow speeds but keeps the electrons moving because of the magnetic fields they create. Not only does it do that but it keeps the object which contains the carbon nanotubes away from floating off into space.
Right, what he's describing folks is a thermodynamics defying Ion Engine. I could have sworn I've seen a similar idea to this somewhere on the net years ago.
Originally posted by Truth1000
Sorry for the sarcasm, GA.
My point was that it is simply an impractical system. There are tens of thousands of highly trained engineers who are working on extremely complex propulsion systems. When I have had the opportunity to discuss what the difficulties are with their programs, I was always incredibly impressed by the degree of knowledge they exhibited, and doubt that your proposal would compare to theirs.
It isn't as though I could come up with anything myself, since I am not an engineer either.
It's pretty short if you compare it to the amount of time it takes to create an electron layer using solar panels.
Originally posted by tauristercus
If this is as revolutionary a breakthrough in propulsion technology as you claim, then I'm somewhat confused as to why you're seeking opinions here on ATS when in fact you should have written up a paper describing your theory, technology and incorporating all your supporting mathematics ... and then submitted it for peer review through the normal channels.
And the same goes for your time travel theory ... why here on ATS and not formally written up for peer review ?
Originally posted by Truth1000
Why do I not trust it?
Can you give me a single example of a demonstration anywhere to show that it is possible? If you show me any example that even remotely proves the slightest realistic chance of the physics of your concept being viable, I will rapidly change my opinion.
Any hint of proof of your physics will be satisfactory.
Originally posted by Truth1000
Why do I not trust it?
Can you give me a single example of a demonstration anywhere to show that it is possible? If you show me any example that even remotely proves the slightest realistic chance of the physics of your concept being viable, I will rapidly change my opinion.
Any hint of proof of your physics will be satisfactory.