It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

EXPOSED: Obama's top secret memo to destroy BP

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by jackflap
 


So in spite of the article being written by a satirist and being completely ridiculous, you choose to believe it's real because you hate Obama?




posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 12:56 PM
link   
Sorry OP

.


LOL.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by InvisibleAlbatross
 


Well even if the memo isn't real, we know that's what is going on don't we? It's so in our faces that it couldn't get any clearer. So I believe the memo is real. I believe they found the memo in the trash bin like the article said and taped it together. I don't hate Obama. I like him just as much as I'd like any talented actor playing a part well.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 01:06 PM
link   
No offense to the OP but this one is a HOAX.

I will consult with the Admins and staff, but I gotta feeling this thread won't be in BAN much longer.....



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 01:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Maxmars
 


It's definitely a hoax.

Emanuel had a room PAYED IN FULL BY BP.

This is complete BS.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 01:12 PM
link   
Well even if it is satire then is there a place for this type of stuff? I should have looked but seriously, I thought it was real at first.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 01:17 PM
link   
I was going to suggest the Jokes Forum. Good to see it here.

But look what I came across! As long as we're joking, that is...






posted on Jun, 20 2010 @ 05:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by JacKatMtn


Barack & Roll? come on...

In this day and age anything like this would have been said face to face, it is his chief of staff after all, why would he have to have that in type?

Can't believe that the times fell for this :shk:


I agree, something like this would never have been written, it's just too sensitive and too risky.







 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join