It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


World Depopulation Plan On Fox News!!!

page: 2
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in


posted on Jun, 11 2010 @ 07:43 PM
Haha that was hilarious. Its been a long time since I've seen some news reader go THAT crazy.

But I must admit that this guy is right. The world has to many people. 7 billion people are more than enough to make the world run. Just look at the ancient times where the population numbers were MUCH lower. We are exhausting the world's food supplies and water supplies with this massive number of people.
I do no agree, however, that people should be killed due to this.
A strict birth control would be much easier and a lot more humane. Then we could at the vert least keep a status quo in population growth.

posted on Jun, 11 2010 @ 08:07 PM
So if you spend all your time counting people then you are no benefit to people!
With the 41 Billion we spent on the Census we could have fed the world for how many years?

posted on Jun, 11 2010 @ 08:22 PM
If we just stopped wasting all our resources on war and spent it on tech we could be off colonising and terraforming the solar system and wouldn't need population control. Silly humans.

posted on Jun, 11 2010 @ 09:01 PM
reply to post by Mr Poopra

Good post. I have thought for a long time about how cool it would be to have ultra sophisticated apartments. Made in a way to create strong communities, incorporate new technologies and safe from natural disasters. These could be built in areas where the current housing is old and falling apart. It wouldn't be mandatory, but a new way of living in dense urban area's. It could be made in a way that encourages people to add their own style or culture to the buildings. This could be done through open space for gardens, walls for murals etc. There could be centers to help people who are disabled or out of work along with learning centers for basic education to people of all ages. Just a general area for people to live comfortable, having the essentials and a community for support instead of waiting on the government to help them. I am also not saying that the government should be the ones to create this. They would probably just screw it up anyway.

posted on Jun, 11 2010 @ 09:50 PM
reply to post by Funk bunyip

yah mon
OIL based economy
locked up responsible technology
is the problem
NOT yer average joe
technologically successful societies have lower birth rates
who said bottom up population control not control the population?
any how what he said

doesn't that say it loudly enough?
CHINA does forced one child policy
STALIN just killed em off willy nilly weee!
POL POT retroactive birth control on every one with an IQ higher than a fork
the wrong people got re-educated there

[edit on 11-6-2010 by Danbones]

[edit on 11-6-2010 by Danbones]

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 12:16 AM
reply to post by UFORacer56

You should play the videogame "Bioshock". Andrew Ryan is one of my heroes. Your post sounds like the premise of the game.

In any event, I'm seeing a few "but we can't kill them!!11 lol" posts. You don't have to kill people to keep the population at a stable level, you just limit the handouts and freebies. Stop rewarding bad behavior. No more incentives and handout for everyone that has kids out of wedlock and can't pay their rent or buy clothes and groceries. Instead reward kids that stay out of trouble and don't have multiple kids out with different guys with no job and no education. I know plenty of "career" moms, meaning they have kids to have free rent and handouts from the government. It's absolutely disgusting.

A good example would be the deer population in Michigan, where i grew up. Every year the hunters would go out and hunt to lower the deer population. If not, the deer would reproduce exponentially (no predators) consume all the resources and STARVE to death. Much better to shoot a few than have the entire deer population dying of starvation in the brutal MI winters. I'm not saying we should apply this "hunting" idea to people, just naturally keep the numbers at a level that benefits everyone...otherwise we will consume everything and kill each other for whatever is left.

I know there are a lot of people on here that would take away our national defense budget to feed the world. That's ludicrous. Feed the world for free and 9 months later when there's another billion people, what then? That isn't the point. The point is teaching responsibility. Only consume what you can afford. You don't have a job and you have have no skills? Sorry, no kids for you. It's not a fundamental right when other people assume the burden of raising, feeding, clothing, and educating your kids because you are worthless. I know it sounds horrible, and invasive, and unfair but so is the alternative: a world full of kids being cared for by tax payers that grow up dependent on what else? TAXPAYERS. Increasing taxes on me because some lowlife can't keep it in his pants is not compassion, it's THEFT.

[edit on 6/12/2010 by Mr Poopra]

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 12:44 AM
reply to post by Mr Poopra

Agreed. Here is the thing peeps, if people have to sustain their idiocy, those that actually ADD to society will flourish. T

Those that don't, won't.

Problems solved.

Kind of increases the family unity thingy also, if you do not have family, you do not survive.

Tough titty said the kitty. Grow up and be responsible you narcissists out there.

Society owes you NOTHING.

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 12:55 AM
The idea is we move from the stone age to the technological age and in this age they're are many people, in future ages there will be a hundred billion people living here, but we will have more scientists, health experts etc than ever before, so many clever people, the trick is to have MORE babies, then we can get to the stars faster, which is all we have to do, get of this rock, then we can have as many kid's as we want.

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 01:00 AM
Overpopulation is just another big fat lie from TPTB. How anybody could possibly think that we need to step in and tell people to stop having kids is beyond me. Hey you want to stop poor folks from punching out 75 kids? Stop giving them free resources! I mean for Pete's sake they couldn't possibly have as many kids as they do if the Gov stopped taking money from those that work and giving it to the human pez dispensors! No need to regulate kids, just stop giving away aid to people for sitting on their butt and having kids. It's not rocket science...

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 01:12 AM
reply to post by Mr Poopra

bravo! I agree with you 100%

and yes I am in favor of depopulation, not by killing anyone, but still.

and you can thank me in advance for doing my part, I have no children nor do I plan on ever having any. Just doing my part to make up for all the trash I know that have too many kids and cant even help them with their 3rd grade homework because they are too stupid

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 01:23 AM

Originally posted by Danbones
he claimed he learned everything he knew about it from the Brits and the Yanks

That's actually true. The Eugenics movement was big in the US early in the 20th century.

The world thought Hitler was mad, but the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race was not Adolf Hitler’s. The idea was created in the United States at least two decades before Hitler came to power. In fact, in 1924, when Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, he frequently quoted American eugenics and displayed a thorough knowledge. “There is today one state, Hitler wrote, in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States." Hitler told his fellow Nazis that he closely followed American eugenic legislation. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

During the beginning of the third Reich, eugenicists across America welcomed Hitler’s plans as the logical implementation of their own research. Ten years after Virginia passed its 1924 sterilization act, Joseph DeJarnette, superintendent of Virginias Western State Hospital, complained in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, “The Germans are beating us at our own game.” In 1934, the number of sterilizations in Germany was accelerating beyond 5,000 per month. Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans were taken from homes for the elderly, mental institutions and other state ran institutions and was systematically gassed. In all, between 50,000 and 100,000 were killed.

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 01:28 AM
This is certainly a problem. The only real solution however is to educate people into not having kids they can't afford....really education period. It would be extremely difficult to implement worldwide however.

Look at Africa and other countries....even here in the USA in some regards....they are going hungry and still having babies. If you are having problems feeding kids...maybe you should STOP HAVING THEM and keep FREE WILLY in your pants.

Another thing that people don't think about:

With a lower population...many retirement programs would be in HUGE TROUBLE. Far less people paying in than those collecting would be a big matter the country it is in.

[edit on 12-6-2010 by David9176]

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 01:42 AM
around here the hard working xians in the grandpa range were Xian.
make babies like 12 14 per family was not un common
not uncommon
make votes tyths and good obediant sheeple

don't want to be rude so I will say xian doctrine
not poor peoples fault..
how many of the over populating examples mentioned here so far are xian examples fullfilling the ulterior motive of the church?

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 04:55 AM
reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory

have you seen Fox News? You know they have Glenn Beck right? Then why are you suprised they are willing to report anything?

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:06 AM
Only in the last few days has the British Prince Charles been speaking out on de-population. This recieved severe backlash by the British community, but today in the news here a top scientist has defended him:

Robert Winston

What a coincidence, both sides of the Atlantic at the same time?..

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:21 AM
I'm all for population control, as long as my family gets a you can live card! Lets see...Third generation welfare as a way of life family's should be the first to volunteer to go "bye bye!!! Regardless of their race, religion or immigration status!

America should be great for great Americans, Not for useless parasites.

And yes Peace/Love ideologues, I'm serious! Welfare has become a way of life for a large number of consecutive generations of less desirable people here in the United States...They have no excuse for being so damn worthless.

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 05:55 AM
reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory

I'm sorry guys, but I didn't get the same take on that story as all you other conspiracy theorists out there.

All this guy is saying, is hey lets stop people just coming over the border and using up our tax payer funds for all manner of government handouts. You should all think of the country as a factory. What would happen if a whole bunch of people just burst through the doors of the factory and started doing what they like...don't think the factory manager would be too happy..productivity would be shot.

Seems to me that the fox reporter hijacked this guy. She's the one you should be looking at...what's her agenda???

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 06:00 AM
Seems he was just saying end large intakes of immigration and welfare incentives to have tons of kids, which I agree with. People should have to live within their means. I don't mean have people starve to death because they havent got food, but give an adult standard food and accommodation if they are in need, but don't pay them extra for having children, tell them thats what they get, if they have a child and can't support it then they have to figure that one out. Make sure they know the consequences, if you can't afford to keep your children don't have them. Lower immigration intake, encourage less children in the developing nations. We can't just keep letting the population grow unchecked, but you don't need to murder people to do it, just stop people getting money from it and they won't.

In my country Australia we had the baby bonus, new mums got a few grand for having a child (we think we're underpopulated for some reason, despite most of our country being desert, in drought or on the eroding coastline). Suddenly, giant spike in the number of births! Just take away incentives for people and they won't have as many children.

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 06:02 AM
Oh my god, that woman is a simpleton...

I believe we should implement population control, or the standard of living of many people will go down. We can see it in africa, we can see it in poor people in many developing and even developed countries, even in my own town. Quality over quantity.

With a combination of tight borders and china-like population control, a stabilization of population could be achieved all over the world. But that is not what TPTB want, they just need plenty of stupid slaves..

Of course, population control is not needed in developed countries, where population is already stabilized.

Reproduction is not a right, but a privilege, IMHO.

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 06:04 AM
reply to post by HistoryIsOnlyHisStory

Who are undesirable ?

The people ? Be sure the elite is also undesirable 1) Their decision is undesirable 2) they cost also energy 3) and a machine/robots/IA would do a better job ( like they have done with your jobs : people ) : Solution : you can go out of the system with autonomy : and bring our country in the right way.

It all begin with you.

top topics

<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in