posted on Jun, 11 2010 @ 04:12 PM
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
I have compiled some information studying this oil spill. On the surface it appears to be one of the worst "ACCIDENTS" in the history of the world.
However, if one were to look deeper, they might see a pattern forming to which it was specifically designed.
Lets take a look:
Halliburton posts a 46% drop in profits due to lack of overseas drilling:
One of the best ways to increase profits is to make sure that you have work. So, if one were to create a disaster in which they were hired to clean,
they immediately are able to replace lost profits by gaining contracts for clean-up.
Now, take a look at this link:
At the surface, this looks quite innocent until you start to get to some more serious issues.
That's right...the above link suggests that Halliburton was responsible for the cementing that created both oil spills.
Now you ask...What does that have to do with posting a 46% profit loss??? Well, if you can't get business through war and oil, which is
Halliburton's bread and butter, what would be the next best way to ensure that you continue to work so that you can boost profits???
Then we have this little Gem: Halluburton Buys "Boots-N-Coots" Oil clean-up company 8 days before the spill: Who can put two and two together on
Here's the conspiracy side: www.datehookup.com...
Here's the mainstream side:www.dailyfinance.com...
Gee...why would this occur do you think??? Why on earth did Halliburton need to purchase "Boots-N-Coots" 8 days BEFORE the spill???
Well now...let's look a little deeper into the profits that can be made by doing such things:
BP chief sells shares before the spill:
Goldman Sachs sells shares as well: Yep, these were the same psychopaths that helped the financial collapse.
And here are some reasons why BP keeps lying about the spill...That's right, it boils down to the almighty DOLLAR:
And look here: A faked clean-up response by BP and the government itself. WHY FAKE IT?
Does everyone here see a BIGGER picture forming??? If not, I could continue playing connect the dots all day, but, for those who critically think,
this is a NO-BRAINER.
I have to go to work now, but, I will post more information shortly.
Star and flag, because if this is what I think it is, its the BIGGEST False Flag in the history of mankind...NEXT TO: 911???
Definition of false flag:
Wake up people!!!
And...MUCH LOVE TO ALL. Love, Peace, intellect, and understanding is our only hopes for survival here. Its amazing to see that so many people are
waking up. Now we have to apply our knowledge to save our country and our people.
All of us are worth more than money. We're all worth more than what are politicians and businessmen sell us off daily for. Its a construct people,
and the construct needs to die.
[edit on 8-6-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]
Ok I gotta argue some of this logic. Halliburton's profits are down yes. Vnezuela's plummeting currency value, the recession lowering fossil fuel
demand, but still turned a 28 cent per share profit.
As far as buying boots n coots. They were competitors. Oilfield services. Halliburton bought a small cleanup company to increase it's marketshare.
Boot's n Coots did about 195 million in business and their net income was 6 million dollars. Purchasing another company, elimination competition
and consilidating services is a nice wat to enhance their market position.
The NPR article didn't suggest that Hallibburton was rresponsible for the defect. THey said their will be an investigation regarding the cementing.
Cement has a very unique property, it turns from a liquid slurry to a solid. When a cement slurry is pumped into the hole it will have a high density.
This density will hold the gas back in the formation in the same way that the drilling fluid does. However as the cement turns from a liquid to a
solid (the exact point is called P70) the cement will essentially take on the density of water and for a few moments may allow gas to enter the
As gas enters the wellbore it will displace fluid from the wellbore; the well will start to flow. On a land rig this is easily spotted but on a semi
submersible (Transocean Horizon) the rig is contantly moving and fluid will tend to be displaced from the wellbore (riser at this point) as a normal
course of events. Most likely the crews keeping an eye on this wellbore mistook it for normal displacement due to the motion of the rig.
Once gas has entered the riser (having passed the BOP stack) the crews didn't stand a chance.
Now Hayward sold his shares during a 2 month high spell right around the time a dip in prices of fossil fuel related stocks was projected to occur.
Now he sold the shares before they maxed out before the spill. Goldman Sachs sold them in the 1st quarter again while the prices were floating high
before a projected dip. Playing it safe.
As far as the faked cleanup response, they spruced it up for the prez. Nice PR work. Terrabonne and LaFourche parishes footed the bill for the
workers. It's a shame they didn't stay and help. Out of all the things you listed this to me is the most offensive.
But all items are explainable. And I don't see an elaborate plot by Halliburton to bring down BP and give themselves more work with the cleanup