It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by billthename
The information in the linked article is of the sort that could cause one to be overwhelmed by fear. I do not want to cause that
and I feel like I need to apologize for even posting this, but it needs to be looked at in view of the Gulf Oil Spill: As you read, the
scope of this thing will slowly hit you. The water shortage also makes a person wonder.
DOES ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS???
Originally posted by DataWraith
There could be ANOTHER reason to have a constructed oil spill. To usher in the new era of energy production?
Using magnetic generators to power homes , solar powered vehicles and such like as the old fossil fuels are now either running out / or unstable to retrieve.
What better way for the energy companies to say " these fossil fuels are now becoming problematic for the world, so we'll invest time and money developing NEW ways to generating electricity" and lo and behold new fangled generators are wheeled out to the hopeful world at vastly over inflated prices , or yours to own for monthly charges of X amount.
I'll be expecting to see electric vehicles and home generators being advertised on a TV near you soon ATS'ers.
When the Army Corps of Engineers first attempted to obtain NASA imagery of the Gulf oil slick, which is larger than is being reported by the media, it was reportedly denied the access. By chance, National Geographic managed to obtain satellite imagery shots of the extent of the disaster and posted them on their web site. Other satellite imagery reportedly being withheld by the Obama administration, shows that what lies under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be the size of Mount Everest. This information has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public, according to Madsen’s sources.
A cursory look at a map of the Gulf Stream shows that the oil is not just going to cover the beaches in the Gulf, it will spread to the Atlantic coasts up through North Carolina then on to the North Sea and Iceland. And beyond the damage to the beaches, sea life and water supplies, the Gulf stream has a very distinct chemistry, composition (marine organisms), density, temperature. What happens if the oil and the dispersants and all the toxic compounds they create actually change the nature of the Gulf Stream? No one can rule out potential changes including changes in the path of the Gulf Stream, and even small changes could have huge impacts. Europe, including England, is not an icy wasteland due to the warming from the Gulf Stream.
Yet there is a deafening silence from the very environmental organizations which ought to be at the barricades demanding that BP, the US Government and others act decisively.
That deafening silence of leading green or ecology organizations such as Greenpeace, Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club and others may well be tied to a money trail that leads right back to the oil industry, notably to BP. Leading environmental organizations have gotten significant financial payoffs in recent years from BP in order that the oil company could remake itself with an “environment-friendly face,” as in “beyond petroleum” the company’s new branding.
The Nature Conservancy, described as “the world’s most powerful environmental group,” has awarded BP a seat on its International Leadership Council after the oil company gave the organization more than $10 million in recent years.
Until recently, the Conservancy and other environmental groups worked with BP in a coalition that lobbied Congress on climate-change issues. An employee of BP Exploration serves as an unpaid Conservancy trustee in Alaska. In addition, according to a recent report published by the Washington Post, Conservation International, another environmental group, has accepted $2 million in donations from BP and worked with the company on a number of projects, including one examining oil-extraction methods. From 2000 to 2006, John Browne, then BP's chief executive, sat on the CI board.
Further, The Environmental Defense Fund, another influential ecologist organization, joined with BP, Shell and other major corporations to form a Partnership for Climate Action, to promote ‘market-based mechanisms’ (sic) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Environmental non-profit groups that have accepted donations from or joined in projects with BP include Nature Conservancy, Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club and Audubon. That could explain why the political outcry to date for decisive action in the Gulf has been so muted.
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
I have compiled some information studying this oil spill. On the surface it appears to be one of the worst "ACCIDENTS" in the history of the world. However, if one were to look deeper, they might see a pattern forming to which it was specifically designed.
Lets take a look:
Halliburton posts a 46% drop in profits due to lack of overseas drilling:
One of the best ways to increase profits is to make sure that you have work. So, if one were to create a disaster in which they were hired to clean, they immediately are able to replace lost profits by gaining contracts for clean-up.
Now, take a look at this link:
At the surface, this looks quite innocent until you start to get to some more serious issues.
That's right...the above link suggests that Halliburton was responsible for the cementing that created both oil spills.
Now you ask...What does that have to do with posting a 46% profit loss??? Well, if you can't get business through war and oil, which is Halliburton's bread and butter, what would be the next best way to ensure that you continue to work so that you can boost profits???
Then we have this little Gem: Halluburton Buys "Boots-N-Coots" Oil clean-up company 8 days before the spill: Who can put two and two together on this ONE???
Here's the conspiracy side: www.datehookup.com...
Here's the mainstream side:www.dailyfinance.com...
Gee...why would this occur do you think??? Why on earth did Halliburton need to purchase "Boots-N-Coots" 8 days BEFORE the spill???
Well now...let's look a little deeper into the profits that can be made by doing such things:
BP chief sells shares before the spill:
Goldman Sachs sells shares as well: Yep, these were the same psychopaths that helped the financial collapse.
And here are some reasons why BP keeps lying about the spill...That's right, it boils down to the almighty DOLLAR:
And look here: A faked clean-up response by BP and the government itself. WHY FAKE IT?
Does everyone here see a BIGGER picture forming??? If not, I could continue playing connect the dots all day, but, for those who critically think, this is a NO-BRAINER.
I have to go to work now, but, I will post more information shortly.
Star and flag, because if this is what I think it is, its the BIGGEST False Flag in the history of mankind...NEXT TO: 911???
Definition of false flag:
Wake up people!!!
And...MUCH LOVE TO ALL. Love, Peace, intellect, and understanding is our only hopes for survival here. Its amazing to see that so many people are waking up. Now we have to apply our knowledge to save our country and our people.
All of us are worth more than money. We're all worth more than what are politicians and businessmen sell us off daily for. Its a construct people, and the construct needs to die.
[edit on 8-6-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
So how much money has Haliburton actually made off the oil spill... you left that out.
Well, that information has yet to be known. The same as the economic collapse. Untold amounts were made by the bankers at the expense of the tax payers, however, all WE know is that it caused our economy to tank.
No. If you accuse a corporation of profiting off the disaster... you'd better know how much, if any, they profited. Otherwise it's baseless lies. Don't get me wrong, I hate Hailburton .. and we can look at their connections to the War and see the billions they made from moving oil, feeding troops, etc, etc..
But if you cannot prove they made a profit at all during this crisis... it's baseless lies. So simply show where they made the profit.
Here's your exact figures.
Well, I'm glad that we got this out of the way...DON"T YOU??? And even better, I told you to be patient and you would get your answer.
HERE IT IS...
[edit on 13-6-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]
Originally posted by area6
Unless BP got duped by Halliburton, profit doesn't make sense as the motivation. This is costing BP AND losing them revenue. BP would be blaming Halliburton big time.
Let's imagine a President who wants to end the wars in the Middle East and "bring the troops home". He hasn't yet because his security advisors keep pressuring him with the realities of peak oil and the need to secure oil reserves in the Middle East.
But he argues back "We have generous reserves in the Gulf of Mexico".
So what do TPTB do about this to convince this peacenic prez that a presence (and expansion) in the ME is necessary?
... now you've got a conspiracy.