Oil Spill Appears to be INTENTIONAL. Destroy the world for the allmighty DOLLAR, page 14
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 205 times


reply posted on 13-6-2010 @ 04:05 PM by justadood
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
Originally posted by area6
reply to
post by EvolvedMinistry



But even if just BPs CEO is complicit ... for Halliburton's profit ... he loses. The guy already owned the stock he sold. It's in his interest to drive the share price up before he sells. It's in his interest to captain a successful company, not this farce.

... because who would hire him if he sank the company to ... not make more money ... but cash out what he already owned. It doesn't make sense. He's getting less out of this deal than he otherwise could have.

It makes sense that he sold his stock because he had foreknowledge and could not prevent what was coming. Which means people with the power to tell BP AND Halliburton what to do had to pull the trigger.

I'm not saying it's not a conspiracy. I'm saying that if it is ... it's bigger than just money.

I should add, Boots and Coots would just be Halliburton profiting from the inevitable event if there was a bigger conspiracy.

[edit on 8-6-2010 by area6]


I'm not for sure that I even need to respond to this, because in your reply, you actually figured it out. It just seems that you're teetering back and forth with the possibilities and what it could all mean.

Look at your own response, and you'll see that it actually makes perfect sense. One company here is subservient to the other. One profits while the other loses, yet, the elite still collect regardless. Just like you said, he (BP's CEO) sold it because of fore-knowledge of impending disaster. One hand washes the other. Sometimes a sacrificial lamb is essential for the benefit of the "greater cause." Just like chess. Sometimes you have to sacrifice your queen to get the main prize...THE KING. Since its apparent that you're a player by your avatar, you will be able to connect these dots quite easily.

[edit on 8-6-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]


Yes, except you claimed BP "Profited" from this. they didn't. You are now back-peddling.


reply posted on 13-6-2010 @ 04:12 PM by justadood
Originally posted by area6
reply to
post by EvolvedMinistry



There are 2 key distinctions I'm making here ...

1) Halliburton is not pulling the strings. Someone above Halliburton and BP is.

2) Which means this is not just about money. It's about control and power ... maybe about the US staying in the ME or going after Iran for oil. And convincing the President that is the only option.

Lots of people will find a way to make money from this. But this is the peak oil section of the forum and in the end money is paper. All that matters is control of depleting world reserves. That will determine the last country standing intact when the SHTF.


I agree completely. From my perspective, this was done to damage the Obama Administration, and force Obama's hand in energy policy. Dick Cheney is a key player here, obviously.

The fact this happened almost immediately after Obama announced plans to open the coast to offshore drilling is KEY. Those who stand to LOSE from the US being more energy-independent acted quickly to make sure that it doesnt happen under his watch, when proper regulations will be FAR more likely to be enforced than the coming pendulum shift under GOP POTUS in 2016.

This benefits those who profit off mid-east oil (like Halliburton), and those who want to make sure that they can discredit the current administration to their own political benefit.



reply posted on 15-6-2010 @ 11:16 AM by icecold7
reply to post by godspunchline



u want more proof okwww.abovetopsecret.com...&addstar=1&on=8977373#pid8977373 next time do the research urself please


reply posted on 21-6-2010 @ 03:21 PM by NoahTheSumerian
OP - a few weeks back you pointed out that the BOP appeared to be / was at serious risk of tilting, and you did a great job explaining the various technicalities etc.

BP today released a statement to UK media (and the world I guess) that the BOP was tilting. We knew this weeks ago, so why have they taken so long to make the statement..?? Further evidence (if any was required) that they are being less than forthright with us.

Today on BBC News, we also discovered that around three weeks before the spill, BP had ignored the explicit advice of one of their own engineers - Tyrone Benton - that there was a risk of a catastrophic blow-out.. He was ignored; they didn't want to stop drilling to make the necessary repairs. It would have cost them £337,000 to shut down for a day.


BP CEO - Tony Hayward - sold a load of his shares, days before the blowout.
Halliburton bought Boots & Coots (oil spill cleanup co.) - again, days before the blowout.

They knew it was coming, and decided to prepare in advance to cut their losses/ balance their losses/ make a profit if at all possible. I wouldn't put it past them that they arranged for it to blowout at a time convenient to themselves...

Tony Hayward had previously spoken the following (pack of lies) while giving evidence to Congress: "There is nothing I have seen in the evidence so far that suggests that anyone put cost ahead of safety, if there are then we will take action."

Those SOBs should be rotting in jail for life. Instead, Tony took the weekend off to go away on his luxury yacht for a bit of R&R with the family.



Here's a link for the original BBC article and video I refer to:

BP ignored engineer's warning of blowout, given weeks prior to disaster

PS - IT WAS PREVENTABLE...!


PPS - And now, in the name of all that's holy - why won't they use those hydrocarbon chomping microbes..?!?!? Instead, they pour lethal chemicals to cover up the mess, which will prolong the damaging effects of the spill.



Noah.


reply posted on 22-6-2010 @ 07:34 PM by Astroved
reply to post by soleprobe



Soleprobe,

Thanks for posting this. I haven't seen this before. They don't have the whole story but they have major pieces of the puzzle. Thanks again!

Astroved
Pages: <<  11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^



2012 Shrimp Season???
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags