It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
You're telling me the gov't is going to go through all that trouble to fake a crash site, plant manufactured evidence . . . send out hordes of disinformation agents to create a fake analysis, and god knows what else, all to invent the slogan, "Let's Roll".
pay off all the nearby witnesses
No, all you showed is speculation you've made up off the tops of your heads.
The black box had been recovered showign that it was in fact flight 93, so there is proof that the crash site is real.
I'm thinkign 10,000 at a very basic minimum who'd be involved in this supposedly "secret" conspiracy of yours.
Originally posted by ATH911
Regardless if that was the main/only reason or not, it worked, didn't it? Bushco used that incident to galvanize the country to war.
Where did we ever suggest that?
No, we showed you EVIDENCE of how it was planted and the signs it was planted. You choose to deny it.
You really think they are going to plant black boxes that say they weren't from UA93?! Use a little common sense buddy.
See, this is why you'd never believe it was a conspiracy, because you "out priced" yourself with the number you believed would had to have been involved. Remember, this is only YOUR speculation and you're stuck on it.
Originallyposted by Draget53
BTW Boeing 757 top speed is : 609 MPH
Now convert it to mach speed and it is: 0.8001
No way in hell that plane went mach 1.2.
But I'm confident most unbiased and rational people can see that list of official facts don't add up.
Originally posted by ATH911
95% of plane found
At a news conference, FBI agent Bill Crowley said that the field near Shanksville, Somerset County, has been turned over to the county coroner and that 95 percent of the plane found at the site has been turned over to United Airlines.
SHANKSVILLE, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- The FBI announced Monday that its investigation of the site where a hijacked jet slammed into a field here is complete and that 95 percent of the plane was recovered.
Crowley says the FBI has finished its investigation at the site, collecting about 95 percent of the Boeing 757 from a field near Shanksville, 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh.
Crowley says the biggest piece found was a six-by-seven foot section of the fuselage, including four windows.
www.wxii12.com...
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Mostly becuase your evidence is speculation you made up off the tops of your heads. Tell me, what expertise do you have in crash site forensics or aeronautical engineering that you're basing your professional analysis on? We both know the answer to that: ZERO.
Originally posted by ATH911
What's the problem with this quote?
Bush announced what he calls a "strike on the financial foundation of the global terror network."
At a news conference, FBI agent Bill Crowley said that the field near Shanksville, Somerset County, has been turned over to the county coroner and that 95 percent of the plane found at the site has been turned over to United Airlines.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
What I am looking for are his quoted words. Again, read the article from the Pittsburgh ABC affiliate:
At a news conference, FBI agent Bill Crowley said that the field near Shanksville, Somerset County, has been turned over to the county coroner and that 95 percent of the plane found at the site has been turned over to United Airlines.
ABC Pittsburgh does not state that 95% of the plane was found. They are reporting that 95% of the plane that was found was given to UA.
Originally posted by ATH911
Oh Lord, this SINGLE typo news report again?
There are like 3-4 other news articles stating he said 95% of the plane was recovered.
Don't you think that ONE article just wrote the description badly? You think that, say, only 50% of a 757 was recovered there and of that, 95% of it was returned to the airlines?! You really think the FBI would announce such an insignificant fact like that? How would that be in the least bit newsworthy?!
Say, are you giving that one article credence because you, like all of us truthers, see absolutely no evidence that comes close to proving 95% of a 757 was actually collected there?!
Originally posted by ATH911
Stop lying GoodOlTroll. You're just a bad as hooper. We showed simple common sense evidence that you don't need to be a forensics/AE "expert" to realize or understand.
- We showed that the engine piece supposedly being unearth was not embedded in the ground at the time of the photo (no expertise needed to understand that)
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Oh, rubbish. The only thing you've proved is that you're interpreting the photos in the way you want to interpret them.
Are engines at crash sites normally supposed to be smashed up, or are they largely in one piece but horribly burned?
pay off armies of witnesses
This isn't research. It's cherry picking
Originally posted by ATH911
Those are the kind of responses I'd expect when someone knows they just got spanked . . . again.
Originally posted by Anti-Evil
the truth of the matter is, the FBI delivered body parts... need I say more -