No one is going to find a new planet close to us. Gravity studies and visual studies would pick up a new planet sized mass out 2x to 8x the distance
to Pluto and that is for the low end of the planetary scale. Jupiter sized masses would be picked up 50x the distance to Pluto.
Well, could you please post the original? It would surely help. But I'm gonna go with Stereologist on this one, it COULD be a flare. There seems to
be some smoke above it. However, the shape itself resembles a celestial body more than a flare.
One of the issues to remember is that a photo cannot tell us how far things are apart. Recall photos of people with little people standing on their
hands. Images flatten our view of the world. That can be exploited by having people in the background move to a place where they appear to stand on a
foreground person. In space we cannot tell if objects are close or far apart since the objects, if real, can be anywhere along a line from the camera
to wherever. The loss of a dimension in images, from 3 to 2, has misled people in a number of scientific fields.
Off topic, but this led to 99 years where all textbooks had the wrong structure for the mammalian liver.
“There are Two Objects in question…A comet-like object (caught on H1 Ahead and H1 Behind) and a dark object (caught only on H1 Behind). I pointed
them out in the video. This has really caught my attention. They could be Nemesis (comet like object) and Nibiru (the dark round object).
While we are being distracted with North Korea and Wikileaks, look at what I caught on NASA’s Stereo website…
I tried to use SOHO, but it is completely offline as of Nov 28th, 2010 for 2 weeks. SOHO’s timing to go offline is very strange since we currently
have a huge object near the Sun.
Therefore, we only have Stereo to view some of the Sun’s activity.
Stereo H1 Ahead Satellite – data range (11/20/10 – 11/30/10)
Stereo H1 Behind Satellite – data range (11/20/10 – 11/30/10)”
SOHO has a planned move and was down 2 days, not the 2 weeks you claim. The move appears to be as planned.
If there were a new comet in the skies amateurs would be all over it. Wait, there are people watching comets. Comet Chasing in December
There are all sorts of comets to check out if you have the proper telescope. Maybe that is a comet. Maybe not. Regardless, there are plenty of comets
and the existence of comets is well known.
That video was made by a nut case. I am giggling terribly. They point to a blemish on the image and claim it is an object although stars can be seen
through it. How funny! Check out 1:55 to 2:00. Watch all of the other blemishes on the image that are transparent to stars.
Don't you love how the statements anthropomorphize the sun? The sun is getting upset. A laughable statement that should be kept in stories for little
While I'm not so sure about Nibiru, I believe I remember reading that they have discovered a possible brown dwarf not far from our system. It's a
cold( 40 degrees above absolute zero?) non-reflective body and they used some sort of nitrogen technology with the telescope to catch a glimpse so I
don't see how IR telescopes will help. The same article claimed that this dwarf may send comets towards earth much as a bowling ball scatters pins.As
to discovering planets that periodically enter the system, I'd have to say that while huge objects , say half the size of Pluto, can be quite hard to
find in the heavens and it seems that the universe is not all that neatly organized, our forefathers may have been looking for an explanation that
humanized a somewhat impersonal and devastating cycle of cometary bombardment and a planet of gold-hungry giants does fill the bill. At the same time,
who knows? I will try and post the name of the author/authoress of the article I am using.
A brown dwarf and being close to 40K seems to me to be a contradiction. Claiming that it is non-reflective also appears to be wrong. The nitrogen
technology is probably a reference to the use of liquid nitrogen to cool an IR camera. The only way that a brown dwarf could send comets towards Earth
is if the brown dwarf were a part of our solar system. No such brown dwarf or other massive object has been reported. You refer to Pluto a a huge
object. It is not. It is small compared to our Moon.
I think that you are a little confused about some of these issues. That's okay. Let's try to figure out what this is all about. Cheers.
I can't post my own topic so I thought this would fit here. I did a search to see if this has been talked about here, and did not find it. This guy
is a bit crackers in his religious views, but I do think he has a gift for seeing things physically in the negative. Watch with an open mind, and I
think you will see there are too many coincidences with the Alexandra Palace not to notice something is up.
This guy is a bit crackers when it comes to astronomy. The suggestion that Nibiru exists is a false idea. It is demonstrable that no unknown planet
can be orbiting the sun and enter the orbits of the known planets. This guy claims that the path of this hoax has to pass between the Earth and the
sun. How ridiculous is that? Of all of the possible orbits this guy wants it to pass not only exactly between the Earth and Sun, but also so close to
the Earth that a sizable portion of the sun is obscured.
I seriously doubt you actually watched the 14 videos in this series, but simply gave your already said ideas about why Nibiru can't possibly be
coming. Most of his video was not about Nibiru, but the winged disc and the symbolism of UFO's throughout the Alexandra Palace and other places.
I did find the symbolism there interesting, including the trite sign outside one of their buildings called CUFOS.
I'd like to hear from others who watch the 14 videos and see what other thoughts they may have, thanks.
You are correct. I did not bother to watch 14 videos of gibberish. I didn't need to see all after seeing what was offered up in the first video.
Nibiru cannot exist. That is a demonstrable fact. No amount of supposed symbolism in a building or anywhere else is going to override the fact that no
unknown planet can enter the orbits of the known planets. The symbolism pointed out in the building was so twisted and far fetched it was ridiculous.
Thanks for replying. I do think it's a shame to be uninformed of what this guy does share. I believe those of the NWO/ TPTB tell us what they are
planning, and do so in very interesting ways via symbolism and outright information via movies and other media propaganda. They even shove it in our
faces and laugh at how stupid the sheeple are.
The series is interesting, and I don't mind watching things even if I don't like everything the person presenting the information says. I prefer to
study things from both sides and keep what resonates and toss out that which does not. I do not hold dogmatically to my beliefs so as to be unable to
expose myself to things that might cause me to have to consider something other than what I have known.
I hope others will watch and share other videos likewise that cause free thinkers to ponder.
I do not have the time to sit through videos that could be presented in written form where I could read the material in 1/4 the time and check it out.
If I watched every knucklehead like this guy I would be wasting copious amounts of time.
The symbolism this guy claims is so stretched and exaggerated I am astounded anyone would waste their time going through all of the video. He claims
that symbols also represent demonstrably impossible events such as an unknown planet having an orbit that enters the part of the system where the
known planets orbit. Why would anyone waste time watching a video in which the symbolism being discussed concerns a demonstrably impossible event?
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.