posted on May, 16 2010 @ 10:32 AM
"im not getting into a argument with you dude, you laughed off an idea calling it stupid ... even though you have most likely not ever had the
experience of capping a oil leak."
No, I have not ever capped off an oil leak a mile under the ocean while thousands of gallons of oil is being pumped out daily, I dont really know
anyone that has.
But what they are suggesting here is laughable to me. You cant cap something by blowing to pieces.
"i also stated that im no expert (more than once), and that im maybe not right, i dont drill oil and i dont have experience with nuclear bombs, i
just know what i have reaserched and read."
And I have still yet to see any of this research backing up that this will work under these circumstances. You said you have the articlesor whatever
in Russian, yet cant translate them. So how could you have researched that information in the first place?
"you have to remember, just because you have posted in other topics does not mean to say i have seen that topics, or even that i know they exist!
(which i did not) ... theirs alot of these topics going about on ats and ats is infact M-A-S-S-I-V-E !, try linking me to your threads so i can see
what you have to say rather than being all defensive and acting like im trying to crap in your cornflakes when all im trying to do is have a
All those exclamation marks indicates tome all you are trying to do is yell and get pissed off at me because I do not buy into this blowing it up
Its common sense to me, it really is. IF YOU BLOW IT ALL UP, AND IT DOESNT WORK, YOU ARE NOW IN A WORSE POSITION THAN YOU STARTED. I had to put that
in bold so you could see it, cause I have stated that I dont know how many times already in just this one thread.
If you blow it up, and make the work down there non manageable, then there is no chance in the future of ever stopping the leak, THEN WHAT?
"really, to me, it makes sence, but maybe thats because i have not seen yours or the 100's of other theorys out their!"
My theory/solution didnt work, as I had stated earlier. The reason it didnt work was because of the ice crystals that formed in the chamber. NOBODY
could have seen that comming. But it may work if we adapted it somehow to where those crystals wouldnt form, but to tell you the truth, I dont think
they want to even try that(I dont know why).
"one major thing that has me thinking is will a nuke actualy make the situation any worse than it already is?? the area is going to be decimated for
a long long long time now, as already stated in other posts, alaska is still seeing oil from exxon valdese.. and how long ago was that, their is a
negligable risk of radiation but will the radiation last longer than the oil which Will be their for a long long time!"
To answer the question in your first sentence, IMO, yes it would.
The area is going to be ruined for sometime yes, but it will be ruined for much longer, and a much more vast of an area than it would if we didnt go
down that road. We need to go about this the RIGHT way, using our technology and our brains. Thats why we have them, to problem solve.
Blowing something up is not always the answer, and this is comming from a guy who loves to make things go boom, OOH RAH.
"pps, dont be an ignorer just because im not on your wavelength, discussions arent about everyone saying the same idea, if that was the case their be
no point in discussing it!"
Im not being an "ignorer" because you are not on my wavelength, I just choose not to repeat myself over and over because someone doesnt want to read
it in the correct context or even read it at all.
My opinion stands. Blowing it up would be STUPID.
[edit on 16-5-2010 by Common Good]
[edit on 16-5-2010 by Common Good]