It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OnTheFelt
Why? Because you don't debate.....instead you ridicule, patronize, and try to derail just about every thread you go into, particularly 9/11 threads.
It's common sense really.....why would anyone that had no interest in the conspiracies of 9/11 continuously post in there? They wouldn't, not unless they were interested in deciphering new information and being open minded to alternate theories. Since you clearly are not, the only other alternative is that you have a motive to be there.
You are the typical disinformationist.....right out of the psychological operations handbook.
Do me a favor and save your BS rhetoric for someone that doesn't know better.
Conspiracy Theories
Cass R. Sunstein
Part II discusses government responses and legal issues, in light of the discussion in Part I. We address several dilemmas of governmental response to conspiracy theories, such as the question whether it is better to rebut such theories, at the risk of legitimating them, or to ignore them, at the risk of leaving them unrebutted. Conspiracy theories turn out to be especially hard to undermine or dislodge; they have a self-sealing quality, rendering them particularly immune to challenge. We suggest several policy responses that can dampen the supply of conspiracy theorizing, in part by introducing diverse viewpoints and new factual assumptions into the hard-core groups that produce such theories. Our principal claim here involves the potential value of cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, designed to introduce informational diversity into such groups and to expose indefensible conspiracy theories as such.
..."Cognitive infiltration"...That says it all right there!
[edit on 11-5-2010 by On the Edge]
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
double post.
sorry
[edit on 11-5-2010 by traditionaldrummer]
Ever stop to consider that given the vast number of registered ATS members, for any given topic there might be dozens of regular contributors interested primarily in that topic? I mean, a chem-trail fanatic might not give a rat's ass about conspiracies in religion; an NWO opponent might have no interest in UFOs. If you spend enough time in ANY forum, you're bound to find the people who are regulars and who are passionate about some of the topics being discussed...
Originally posted by ugie1028
Ever notice people just posting in specific forums, and rarely post anywhere else? Ever notice that they just HOUND these certain areas of ATS obsessing over one topic and one topic only, rarely posting in other areas of ATS? Do these members have an agenda? Are they conintelpro? Are they here to just shoot down conspiracy theories VIA trolling derailing thread like they are getting paid for it?
It just doesn’t seem right. It’s in all forums, not just 911, or the UFO forum. It just seems there are teams in each board area waiting for the next topic to be posted. When these topics are posted, they tag team in threads refuting with the same debunked stuff, over and over again. (I could be wrong, they could be doing it for free.)
Originally posted by ugie1028
Do you think there are paid posters on ATS?
Originally posted by OnTheFelt
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by mumma in pyjamas
Question, do you have ANY clue what this guy is on about?
I am failing to understand, i am .... mindblown.
I debate a lot of conspiracy theories, therefore some people are convinced that I could only be paid by someone to express my opinions.
And therein lies the danger of conspiracy theories. For some people it snowballs into believing that anyone disagreeing with you is a government agent sent to counter your opinion.
Please, spare me the BS....and don't confuse my words. A healthy debate is great, and I support anyone's own personal take on a specific topic.
However, if one was to go to your historical posts it would be quite obvious to what I am referring to.
Why? Because you don't debate.....instead you ridicule, patronize, and try to derail just about every thread you go into, particularly 9/11 threads.
It's common sense really.....why would anyone that had no interest in the conspiracies of 9/11 continuously post in there? They wouldn't, not unless they were interested in deciphering new information and being open minded to alternate theories. Since you clearly are not, the only other alternative is that you have a motive to be there.
You are the typical disinformationist.....right out of the psychological operations handbook.
Do me a favor and save your BS rhetoric for someone that doesn't know better.
Do you think there are paid posters on ATS?
I am currently more concerned with determining if any posters are real and really exist as people (besides myself), and whether the whole site is in my imagination.