It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you need an explanation of how men standing in front of mannequins of themselves can be indicative that the scaling is correct, there is no hope for you. Of course, I doubt this is anything more than your reflexive gainsaying while you scramble to find an actual counterpoint to make or your latest collection of links, pictures, Youtubes, and text walls to razzle-dazzle us with.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by FoosM
Why are the astronauts so small in comparison to the average person?
The mannequins look just fine and to scale.
How do you figure?
If I had posted that image, you guys would ask me the same thing.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
edit on 11/15/2011 by SayonaraJupiter because: (no reason given)edit on 15-11-2011 by Gemwolf because: Fixed tags
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by Gibborium
reply to post by FoosM
The term is called Dwindling size perception.
My dog is not smaller than my thumb. The mannequins are not smaller in the pictures in question.
What does that have to do with the photos I posted?
I purposely choose photos to minimize that effect.
JRA choose one where that effect was enhanced.
And how can you determine the mannequins are true representations of the astronauts' height
based upon "dwindling size perception"?
How about that UV camera model:
how tall is that?
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
We know that Apollo is fake. That's why they have a Keepout Zone. And fake LEM's at the National Air & Space Museum.
Why are the astronauts so small in comparison to the average person?
www.armaghplanet.com...
This site settles it..
www.aulis.com...
The same backdrops!! How does the LM position change and the backdrop remain the same?
Parallax ! The photo is taken at the same point.. notice the ground to the left!
Have another look at the photo.
Unlike many other Apollo skeptics, the Aulis authors are NOT claiming that astronauts from Earth have never walked on the Moon.
Originally posted by FoosM
How do you figure?
If I had posted that image, you guys would ask me the same thing.
Originally posted by mockrock
This site settles it..
The same backdrops!! How does the LM position change and the backdrop remain the same?
Parallax ! The photo is taken at the same point.. notice the ground to the left!
Originally posted by mockrock
Now in 1965 NASA Gemini 4 | NASA's achieved second Ever Space Walk - Narrated By Ed White (June 3, 1965)
The footage is in color and great quality. This is the quality that was available in 1965.
www.youtube.com...
Now compare with 1969 'moon landing'
www.youtube.com...
Damn! shame they hadn't packed that old camera! The new one is rubbish.. and we seem to have gone back to black and white.
Now I am sure there is some elaborate explanation for this..