You won't believe this. This is no joke. I'm speechless as I write this.
The whole Moon Hoax Debate, which I thought had died off long ago, has been revived by this young genius from Australia who has been kicking butt
against astronomers appointed by NASA to debate the moon hoaxers such as Phil Plait of www.badastronomy.com, Jay Windley, the Mythbusters program, and
other "NASA Propagandists" as he calls them.
This kid is something you have to see to believe. He calls himself Jarrah White. He looks only about 25 or so, yet he's the best debater I've ever
seen. His arguments and reasoning are so thorough and scholarly. Everything he says is sourced and documented. He has documents on everything, even
stuff from the 60's. He even performs scientific experiments, when he can, to back up and illustrate his argument, showing and explaining each step
to the viewer. Therefore, he doesn't just make arguments, he SHOWS you the scientific facts and results through experiments right in front of you,
either by him, or by others.
In doing so, he has unmasked critical errors and omissions of Phil Plait, the Mythbusters, and others. It's absolutely brilliant. I'm astounded by
it. I've never seen a young guy who was so thorough and logical. His videos all look very professionally produced and his presentation is very
professional as well. It's something you have to see to believe.
Here is his YouTube Channel. He has like over 300 videos now. His video series is called MoonFaker.
Check out this 3 part segment where he shows an untouched flag waving on the moon, where there is no air. Then he cites the Lunar Journal's 6
speculative explanations for the moving flag and debunks them all, with simple experiments, precendents and deduction.
MoonFaker: The Flags are Alive
And here he shows you EXACTLY WHY the Lunar Module on the moon must have had a blast crater under it, contrary to NASA defenders' explanations to the
contrary. All the math, science and documented experiments by NASA and other organizations is shown to you in full detail, in a five part video
MoonFaker - No Crater
In this one, he gets to the bottom of the debate about whether the "C" rock in a moon photo right next to the "C" on the ground, is an original or
the same photo with the "C" airbrushed out is, and whether it is a piece of hair or a marker. By simple research and deduction, Jarrah White shows
that the NASA defenders are wrong and supporting an obvious cover up.
MoonFaker - Rocks and Crocks
In this funny one, he explains how in theory the astronauts should have been able to jump 14 feet in the air, according to NASA's calculations, yet
the Apollo astronauts usually only jumped 20 inches off the ground, and why NASA's defenders' explanations for this do not fit.
MoonFaker - One Giant Leap
Here's another thoroughly researched one. Here he takes some famous photographs with lighting oddities and performs tedious experiments to see if
NASA defenders' explanations hold up. In it, he even exposes deceit and factual errors by the Mythbusters program.
MoonFaker - Reflect on this
There's more at his channel, including many videos dissecting and scrutinizing the recent LRO aerial photos of the moon, which seem to be far less
accurate than even Google Earth is.
The only folks who won't like these videos are the establishment defenders who mistakenly believe that "authority = truth" and worship "status quo
and orthodoxy" as their Lord and God, and believe that "critical thinking" can never be used against establishment or orthodoxy, only against those
who would challenge it.
Remember folks, a true skeptic is willing to challenge authority and orthodoxy, and apply his critical thinking and skepticism in that direction.
Those who absolutely cannot are not skeptics, they are establishment defenders. Randi, Shermer, CSICOP, the BadAstronomy.com folks, the Mythbusters,
Penn and Teller, and the skeptics on my SCEPCOP forum are establishment defenders, not true skeptics.
These establishment defenders were taught in high school that "authority = truth" and therefore is never to be questioned, and that doing and
believing what you're told leads to reward, while the opposite leads to punishment. They are unable to free themselves of their programming and
conditioning, so in that sense, they are not "freethinkers".