It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So now you say it did move??
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by backinblack
So now you say it did move??
Yes, but only after the astronaut interacted with it. What was the point of the video?
Originally posted by 000063
You're trying to obscure the fact that you refused to produce the video relating to the flag-waving under direct questioning, up until I pointed out the trap you had fallen into by doing so.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by backinblack
So now you say it did move??
Yes, but only after the astronaut interacted with it. What was the point of the video?
Originally posted by backinblack
OK, here's a good challenge for all..
Actually it would make a good thread but let's stick to this one..
Let's pretend NASA is the defendant in a trial and the Judge has ruled ALL evidence from them is inadmissible due to possible tampering and bias..
Now, prove to me that MAN LANDED ON THE MOON..
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by backinblack
All the countries that participated with the US in getting the men there, the UK, Spain, Australia, their testimony along with the Russians should be well enough. All the non NASA agencies, all the non US nationals who worked on Apollo, their testimony should also be more than enough, more than 40,000 people worked on the Apollo missions and they weren't all NASA people.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by backinblack
All the countries that participated with the US in getting the men there, the UK, Spain, Australia, their testimony along with the Russians should be well enough. All the non NASA agencies, all the non US nationals who worked on Apollo, their testimony should also be more than enough, more than 40,000 people worked on the Apollo missions and they weren't all NASA people.
Let's pretend NASA is the defendant in a trial and the Judge has ruled ALL evidence from them is inadmissible due to possible tampering and bias..
Now, prove to me that MAN LANDED ON THE MOON..
No DJ, the flag moved prior to the astronaut passing it.
Its pretty clear.
I even posted a video of an Apollo supporter who shows this.
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by backinblack
All the countries that participated with the US in getting the men there, the UK, Spain, Australia, their testimony along with the Russians should be well enough. All the non NASA agencies, all the non US nationals who worked on Apollo, their testimony should also be more than enough, more than 40,000 people worked on the Apollo missions and they weren't all NASA people.
So my challenge should be easy for you..
Now show me the detailed proof and let's see how it pans out.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by backinblack
Let's pretend NASA is the defendant in a trial and the Judge has ruled ALL evidence from them is inadmissible due to possible tampering and bias..
Now, prove to me that MAN LANDED ON THE MOON..
Like OJ Simpson, NASA would be found "not guilty." In other words, they would be presumed to be innocent of faking the Moon landing. Oddly enough, Jarrah and his supporters seem to live in a world where the defendant is considered guilty until proven innocent, and any material presented by the defense is ruled inadmissible. I think this says something about their mentality.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
No DJ, the flag moved prior to the astronaut passing it.
Its pretty clear.
I even posted a video of an Apollo supporter who shows this.
I am posting this video only because videos seem to be the only thing you are able to comprehend.
Is it really that difficult to find independent proof of a moon landing?
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by backinblack
All the countries that participated with the US in getting the men there, the UK, Spain, Australia, their testimony along with the Russians should be well enough. All the non NASA agencies, all the non US nationals who worked on Apollo, their testimony should also be more than enough, more than 40,000 people worked on the Apollo missions and they weren't all NASA people.
So my challenge should be easy for you..
Now show me the detailed proof and let's see how it pans out.
What?? You want me to contact all these people and ask them???
Look man, I believe they have landed, 6 times, you don't, I couldn't give a hoot, no disrespect.
I posted evidence that the flag moved prior to the astronaut reaching the flag.
Now how do you account for this?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Is it really that difficult to find independent proof of a moon landing?
Every time it is presented, you rule it "inadmissible." Now, where is your proof that it was faked? Documents, witnesses, physical remains... the whole corpus delicti..?
Just admit it. You guys dont have zilch.