It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I heard the comments about all the micrometeorites at [super?] ballistic speeds that would rip holes in spacesuits, people & spacecraft.
Are we to question the shuttle & the space station too?
They have extended freefall shots....
Even the vomit comet can only sustain that for very short periods [25 seconds?].
Although the Apollo 13 movie WAS filmed via extensive use of the vomit comet.
Mirrors on the Moon
-------------------
This can be done by just about anyone. Ok, maybe not everyone, but plenty have done it and it proves men have been up there.
Basically all you do is buy a laser and a detector and a light collecting mirror. Then you fire it at a precise point on the moon. There is a preflecting prism there that acts like a mirror, placed by Apollo astronauts. Now if there was nothing at that point but rock that would be the last you would see of your laser. But time and time again scientist [sic] have been getting their laser reflecteted back. Indeed, they have done a number of experiments using these reflectors. This experiment has provided a very accurate method of measuring the distance to the moon. Due to these experiments we can now tell that the moon is actually steadily rededing from the Earth.
The illuminated spot on the moon is typically 4 to 6 kilometers in diameter but, because each corner reflector sends the light hitting it back in almost the same direction from which it comes, the teturn signal at the earth from the reflector panel is 10 to 100 times larger than the reflected intensity from the lunar surface.
“The isotopes of oxygen that exist on the moon are the same as those that exist on Earth, so it was difficult if not impossible to tell the difference,” Larry Taylor, a co-author of today’s paper, said in the [University of Tenessee] statement. “Since the early soil samples only had trace amounts of water, it was easy to make the mistake of attributing it to contamination.”
The molecules and hydroxyl — a molecule consisting of one oxygen atom and one hydrogen atom — were discovered across the entire surface of earth’s nearest celestial neighbor. While the abundances are not precisely known, as much as 1,000 water molecule parts-per-million could be in the lunar soil: harvesting one ton of the top layer of the moon’s surface would yield as much as 32 ounces of water, according to scientists involved in the discovery.
Originally posted by FoosM
You will see that the left side of the reflection shows a brighter lunar surface than the right side.
Yet the red side is the side where you see more light bounce. Where is that coming from?
ANd what is causing the light bounce on the antenna?
His suit, the LM should be fully blocking the sun.
Originally posted by cushycrux
AND AGAIN.....
www.universetoday.com...
It's 100% clear, Apollo 15 was on the moon
on the left: selene/jaxa Hight Data - right: Nasa Photo
accept or deny....proof.
Originally posted by torch2k
You still out there, FoosM?
Been working my way through the estimable Mr. White's 'arguments'. Think it's time to suggest a little 'quid pro quo'.
Does Jarrah have anything to say about this?
ntrs.nasa.gov...
Honestly, most of the subject matter so far is outside my area of expertise. This, however, is right up my alley. After 30 years (more or less) in telecommunications (heck, I taught it for 4), I'd love to see Jarrah White's genius applied to the question of how this was faked.
Hey, it's only fair, right? I'm doing your homework on 32 points (5 already, and 6 more as we speak), so wouldja mind checking out this 1 for me?
Awesome! Thanks in advance!
(dragnet53)
...again notice no equipment...
and I know Japanese are honorable people.
They seemed half convinced from all the articles I read on the subject.
and but why not show 11 and 12 landing sites?
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by cushycrux
AND AGAIN.....
www.universetoday.com...
It's 100% clear, Apollo 15 was on the moon
on the left: selene/jaxa Hight Data - right: Nasa Photo
accept or deny....proof.
and again notice no equipment and I know Japanese are honorable people. They seemed half convinced from all the articles I read on the subject. but why not show 11 and 12 landing sites?????????????
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by FoosM
You will see that the left side of the reflection shows a brighter lunar surface than the right side.
So what does this mean to you exactly? How is that a sign of the photo being a fake?
You are aware that the Lunar surface itself is uneven and undulating right?. Why would you expect the light that reflects off the Moon to be even when the Lunar surface isn't? Note that there are a lot more craters on the right side of the reflection in his visor, than on the left. Perhaps that plays a roll in the appearance of the brightness between the two sides?
Yet the red side is the side where you see more light bounce. Where is that coming from?
I assume you meant to say "right" side and not "red". But I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're saying, when you say there is more light bouncing from his right side.
because NASA won't go back.
and again notice no equipment
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Btw, thanks, Torch2k, for taking on the 64 questions video...
If you need help with any, let me know.
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by cushycrux
AND AGAIN.....
www.universetoday.com...
It's 100% clear, Apollo 15 was on the moon
on the left: selene/jaxa Hight Data - right: Nasa Photo
accept or deny....proof.
and again notice no equipment and I know Japanese are honorable people. They seemed half convinced from all the articles I read on the subject. but why not show 11 and 12 landing sites?????????????
Originally posted by debunky
Let me try to explain dragnet53:
Right hand side, the one with the rover is a photo from Apollo 15
Left hand side is a computer generated image, based on jaxa data.
When NASA was hoaxing the Moon Missions, they didn't have access to the JAXA data, since that was still 40 years in the future. So they either got incredibly lucky, filming apollo 15 with hills that are 100% like those on the moon, or JAXA, realizing that their data didn't match NASA photos, decided to make their computer models according to NASA photos instead of their real data.
These are the only 2 possibilities. Wich one do you think is more likely?
Originally posted by dragnet53
and again notice no equipment and I know Japanese are honorable people. They seemed half convinced from all the articles I read on the subject. but why not show 11 and 12 landing sites?????????????
Originally posted by Komodo
WHY? !
[edit on 5/15/2010 by semperfortis]
Originally posted by debunky
When NASA was hoaxing the Moon Missions, they didn't have access to the JAXA data