It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FoosM
I think you are just trying to fill this page with junk posts to move the thread away from
new readers that may discover NASA lies like this great photo mystery:
I'm merely asking for a clarification of the point you were trying to make in the post in question.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by 000063
FoosM, you seem to be calling DJ a liar. Are you calling him a liar? If not, then what are you calling him?
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by DJW001
He could easily have raised it beside his head and let it slide down behind his back. Thanks!
Oh come on stop playing around.
Lets get serious here.
I dont think you believe what you just wrote.
You seem awfully interested in non interesting things.
You just made three posts that could have been made into one.
And neither has anything to do with with proving the moon landing happened.
Or, debunking JW or any other evidence of fakery.
I think you are just trying to fill this page with junk posts to move the thread away from
new readers that may discover NASA lies like this great photo mystery:
Originally posted by FoosM
You have yet to explain how a seated astronaut with a PLSS could turn around to stow away an item.
As you can see in the following pictures. It should be quite easy for them to just put away anything on that bag thingy they had on the side of the PLSS, that was exactly for that pourpose.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by hateeternal
As you can see in the following pictures. It should be quite easy for them to just put away anything on that bag thingy they had on the side of the PLSS, that was exactly for that pourpose.
But he didn't...
How about you concentrate on the "actual" pics and subject in question..
Where did the sampler go in the "pics" being discussed?
It is NOT in the "baggy thingy" and that's not really where it's meant to go anyway..
Can you point me to where the original set of pictures is. Only then I can concentrate in the "Pics" being discussed.
I don't care about you're animated gif. it doesn't tell me anything.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by hateeternal
Can you point me to where the original set of pictures is. Only then I can concentrate in the "Pics" being discussed.
I don't care about you're animated gif. it doesn't tell me anything.
They are in the thread..
The way you jumped in with all the answers I assumed you knew where..
I haven't posted an animated gif...
Originally posted by FoosM
We know the entire event too no longer than 4 seconds.
The three photos would have to be taken within those 4 seconds.
The camera takes one second to wind the roll for the next shot.
That does not include the time it takes for the photographer to press the trigger for each photo.
The photos however do not show the astronaut jumping up, hovering, and landing in his seat.
All three photos are after the initial jump. So basically you would have to say it took 3 seconds to land!
Still think its a non-issue? Are you being intellectually honest?
In those 3 seconds, the astronaut managed to pull out the LRV sampler, change hands, and made it disappear.
All this with no motion blur in the photos.
Its MAGIC look!
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/453cb59c2a1a.gif[/atsimg]
Originally posted by hateeternal
Originally posted by FoosM
We know the entire event too no longer than 4 seconds.
The three photos would have to be taken within those 4 seconds.
The camera takes one second to wind the roll for the next shot.
That does not include the time it takes for the photographer to press the trigger for each photo.
The photos however do not show the astronaut jumping up, hovering, and landing in his seat.
All three photos are after the initial jump. So basically you would have to say it took 3 seconds to land!
Still think its a non-issue? Are you being intellectually honest?
In those 3 seconds, the astronaut managed to pull out the LRV sampler, change hands, and made it disappear.
All this with no motion blur in the photos.
Its MAGIC look!
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/453cb59c2a1a.gif[/atsimg]
Please tell me why do you think these picures had to be taken in 4 secs. Only one of the pictures is described as being Schmitt jumping into the rover. the other pics could have been taken any time after that. a minute, 30 secs. But why do you say they are taken in a max period of 4 secs?? i just dont get it. do you have proof that the pictures were taken in sequence in that time-frame? I'd like to see that...
you can clearly see that these pictures were not taken on that time-frame, the photographer ( Cernan) was in diferent positions on the 3 pictures. what about that?edit on 8-6-2011 by hateeternal because: (no reason given)
Gene goes to the front of the Rover to take pictures of Jack jumping in his seat. The three pictures are AS17-134- 20452, 20453, and 20454.
168:47:08 Schmitt: Ready? (Pause)
168:47:12 Cernan: I got three of them that time.
Between "Ready" and "I got three of them"
there are only 4 seconds.
The photos only show the landing sequence of the event.
Not the take-off.
So thats 3 photos for just the landing in the seat portion.
But why do you say they are taken in a max period of 4 secs?? i just dont get it. do you have proof that the pictures were taken in sequence in that time-frame? I'd like to see that...
you can clearly see that these pictures were not taken on that time-frame, the photographer ( Cernan) was in diferent positions on the 3 pictures. what about that?
Ready to become an Apollo moon landing skeptic? A hoax believer?
Here is part one the original post:
And here's the part where your original post starts to get demolished:
Originally posted by DJW001
If you're just going to repeat your tired old "arguments," I might as well repeat myself, too.
Originally posted by FoosM
Here is what NASA said:
Gene goes to the front of the Rover to take pictures of Jack jumping in his seat. The three pictures are AS17-134- 20452, 20453, and 20454.
Speaking of which, for the third and last time, were you calling DJ a liar?
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by DJW001
If you're just going to repeat your tired old "arguments," I might as well repeat myself, too.
I was asked a question, thats what I was addressing.
We didnt need your input. Stop trying to interrupt and derail conversations.
You cant let other people think and answer for themselves can you?
edit on 9-6-2011 by FoosM because: (no reason given)
Because if you refuse to answer, I'm just going to assume you agree with his post, and you think it was perfectly possible for the astronaut to just drop the object behind him.
All I'm asking is whether you think DJ was telling what he thought to be the truth, or a deliberate
I was asked a question, thats what I was addressing.
We didnt need your input. Stop trying to interrupt and derail conversations.
You cant let other people think and answer for themselves can you?
FoosM said he didn't believe that DJ believed what he was saying. Twice. That sounds like FoosM was accusing DJ of being a liar. I asked him for clarification once, and he tried to change the subject. I asked him again, and he ignored it. All I want is for him to tell me, in a direct statement, if he was calling DJ a liar. FoosM has a pathological aversion to direct statements, haven't you noticed? Even the simplest ones. I wonder what's so hard about saying "I think you're lying"?
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by 000063
Because if you refuse to answer, I'm just going to assume you agree with his post, and you think it was perfectly possible for the astronaut to just drop the object behind him.
All I'm asking is whether you think DJ was telling what he thought to be the truth, or a deliberate
What's this liar stuff??
I think you'll find DJ was merely giving an opinion, NOT an answer..
Who know's if DJ believes that's the true explanation?
Ask him, not Foosm..