posted on Apr, 19 2010 @ 06:47 PM
Originally posted by NightGypsy
How do you know for sure these are baseless claims?
They are based on nothing. Usually a good indication of being baseless.
True, he doesn't specifically outline the nature of the evidence he says will prove these allegations, but he says it will be made public at
When is that going to happen?
Based on that, we really don't know what he has.
I guess we should look at what we do know. This man has impeccable credentials that HE GAVE TO HIMSELF. He is a fake and a fraud. Gosh, I hope his
evidence is better. Frauds always have the best truth somewhere, right?
So what evidence do you have to emphatically state this guy is a loon and an idiot?
He gave himself a degree and then uses that degree to try and claim he is trustworthy based on his education. That is pretty loony. That is much like
making yourself your own judge, letting yourself off and then using that as proof you were innocent. Nuh uh.
You say "Do your homework before you start a riot." Did you do yours before you dismiss this stuff as the rantings of a loon?
So instead of acknowledging you should do some and actually doing some, you just ask somone else if they did theres. Well, I have done mine. Maybe
when you get done blindly defending this fraud and go look into him, you will have something to actually say to that. Until then, all you have is
'No, I did not, did you?' What a way to make a case!
If you have evidence of him being a nut, then why don't you tell us what it is? Manning has to provide evidence to prove what he's saying,
and you don't?
Where is Manning's evidence? When did he produce it? You are already giving him credit and you do not even know what his evidence wouyld be.
So you will just believe whatever Manning says without evidence but all the work of googling the man yourself to find out who he really is would be
out of line?