It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wotan
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
At least I admitted I was wrong about that particular part of the treaty where a British Nobility title is placed before his Kingship title - the Elector title is still way down the list and has no significance. It does not alter anything major to what I have already said.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
He was also the arch-treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire, because back in the 1200’s William the Conqueror bequeathed England and all his, and his heirs possessions to the Pope and Rome in exchange for his Blessing.
Originally posted by daddio
If Jesus, if that was his real name, was killed, murdered, whatever term you wish to use, by the Roman gaurds, WHY oh WHY is the center of Christ-ianity or Catholicism, not sure I spelled that right, in the center of Rome? Why isn't it in Jerusalem? Did the Israeli's hate him that much too.
Originally posted by daddio
When I went to catechism, my question was always the same, WHY? Why is the center of the religion in ROME, the capital of the country, who's elite gaurd, murdered the man. Now there is a shrine to him, a holy temple and all that jazz.
Originally posted by daddio
Does that make sense?
Originally posted by daddio
So we can see how we have been duped and manipulated into the falacy of the ruling powers. I think there pomp and circumstance is one huge circus and the Elite are the clowns. I think that is just too funny, they are so full of themselves it's ridiculous.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
This is not only entirely untrue, but unsourced too.
I am an outspoken critic of Zionism, but in fact, I see it to be an organization controlled by Rome, and can source dozens of posts where I have stated clearly in debates with people who think Zionism is the driving culprit that it is not, but that it is Rome.
Originally posted by daddio
What I have simply displayed in this thread is the road an American's Tax Money travels and why.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Obviously you don't appreciate that.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
They have told me, you can't please everyone all of the time, and I am inclined to accept that.
I am not alone in these beliefs, and misrepresenting my own beliefs, and actions, as a obvious means to discredit, is well...
You know what that is!
Thanks for posting.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
You ACTUALLY have to know WHO the elite are and many people(including myself) have given this info out many times, only to have it ignored or ridiculed.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
You should understand foreign citizens do not like to be slandered by AT BEST unsubstantianed rumors. If I were british, a roman or a jew I would certainly take offense!
You should understand foreign citizens do not like to be slandered by AT BEST unsubstantianed rumors. If I were british, a roman or a jew I would certainly take offense!
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
You should understand foreign citizens do not like to be slandered by AT BEST unsubstantianed rumors. If I were british, a roman or a jew I would certainly take offense!
Don't worry, we're used to it. The British - and by that people usually mean English - having been taking the blame for the world's ills for over a 100 years, and in some cases, almost a 1000 years.
It's what makes whiny threads from some Americans - "the world hates us!" - all the more laughable. They think it's tiresome now, after only a decade of it? They can come back in another 100 years and we'll take the boo-hooing a little more seriously.
Interesting, two anti-monarchy threads on the go.
If you seriously think this is anything to do with 'monarchy' then you're seriously confused. There's plenty of places in Africa that aren't run by monarchy and are completely screwed.
I've just had to stomach a year of Americans (understandably) complaining about their economy with bail-outs and various other scams. I'm not aware of America having a 'monarchy' unless there's a secret, self-hating hankering for George the III merchandise that I'm not aware of.
I'm a socialist politically, I'm hardly a monarchist. The truth of this is that people at the top, whether it's a monarchy, republic or whatever, tend to cream the top off for themselves whilst the little guy gets shafted. If you only see this in monarchies, then you're really on the wrong site.
'Free Speech' in America
I know I've a reputation amongst some here for being an 'America-basher', but that's honestly not what this thread is about. This is a genuine question and I sincerely hope to learn something.
I often see the notion of free speech thrown about on this forum, often within the context of Americans being free to say what they want whenever they want and often also in the context of Americans being freer than anyone else in the world to say whatever they want when they want.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
In fact all I stand convinced of by such arguments is that I have struck a nerve somewhere, and an important one.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
And the British still worship monarchy and have a Queen!
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTravelerBecause ultimately you believe in Hegelian principles where the State is everything, and the citizen in it is nothing, and only exists to worship the State.
As you own above words, in your own words display you are a monarchist, and any monarchy is a good one.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by Merriman Weir
Of course what you haven't pointed out is any valid research to dispute the contentions and premises laid out in my opening thread.
The reality is that thread is not about you as a English citizen,
That you would like to make it about you or me is telling.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
What you have failed to do, is to establish slander.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
And no matter how you attempt to mangle what I have said in my posts, to try to construe them as having said something differently than what I have, my posts remain as testaments to what I actually have said.
Which might make some people wonder, why it is your arguments against what you contend are slander, can't be made in any other way, than misquoting my posts, speculating about my motivations, and evoking national and religious fervor as a means to counter a lot of well thought out research time and effort.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Your arguments will become effective when you do!
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Thanks for illustrating what so far is the sole basis for your contention, in that some people can't stand to be questioned.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I wonder why?
Thanks for posting.
Nothing vague or loose about my research or methedology, I have laid out a compelling and factual case for where American Tax Payer money goes and why.
Israel is by the way a creation and tool of the Zionists, and the Zionists are a creation and tool of the Papal Rothschilds.
Papal being the key words there.
They play a key role, in getting modern day events to mimic religious philosophy to ease reistence on the march to a one world government.
To which there is no shortage of evidence to demonstrate that they are doing that, and that the Zionists are in control of Israel, that Rothschild is in control of the Zionists, and that the Papacy is in control of the Rothschilds.
But that is just the problem isnt it, you have NOT shown us any research whatsoever. Your theory is all conjecture with no sound basis, no facts, no documentary evidence.