It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by HunkaHunka
I took it to mean an early form OF Sanskrit.
Cuneiform might be older than Sanskrit, then again might not be.
The 'authorities' reckon Sanskrit to be about 4 - 5000 years old, although many Hindus speak of Vedas that are up to 10,000+ years old, although there's no documentary evidence apparently.
This 'Pre - Sanskrit' could have preceded what we know as Sanskrit by any amount of time. Anything from say, 1 year - upwards.
It's very interesting isn't it.
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Maegnas
For someone that says others jump to conclusions you should check yourself out first.
The response I made refering to Chinese folk lore saying the pyramids in China were built by blonde haired, blue eyed people and your conclusion that these were NAZI's??????
Many other peoples of this world have blonde hair and blue eye's are all these the spawn of Hitler?
I agree all these relics need to be varified and examined, so does Klaus Doner.
Do we regard the pyramids themselves as fake as the established historians cannot tell us how these were even built.
As I said before if all/most of the important information is known how hard would it be for them to give the answers teaching the real truth at the same time.
But hey if you are happy to explain away anything you have no answers for as fake who am I to tell you different but please dont try to put your words in my mouth. Its un hygenic.
Originally posted by colin42
Klaus Dona's web site is worth a look
unsolved-mysteries.info...
I found out what loodite is, cillic slate. So the tools and carved disks shown must of been like carving glass.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Originally posted by colin42
Klaus Dona's web site is worth a look
unsolved-mysteries.info...
I found out what loodite is, cillic slate. So the tools and carved disks shown must of been like carving glass.
It's worth a look if you're willing to check out the exhibits he posts. Dona is dishonest...he's misidentifying, misinterpreting and simply lying about the objects in his website collection.
If you're genuinely interested in these artifacts...research them. You'll realise that the Donas of the world have little interest in facts. He, and others like him, are lying to you.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by colin42
Check out my first posts in this thread...some links there
Originally posted by mutantgenius
Those are pretty cool finds. Do you follow Graham Hancock? He does some interesting work on ancient civilisations.
What I find most interesting is how conventional science totally ignores this stuff. I always say that what the ancients did was like magic. Real abracadabra stuff. I love the magnetic pyramid, where was that found? Interesting how the triangle is so prevelant in ancient culture, representing divinity and divine communication and what about its use by the super-rich and powerful in this day and age? I think their ignorance on this subject is a testament that they know more than we think! I would like to see scientists take a more objective approach to the true origins of man, how long can they continue to reject the evidence because it doesn't fit into their theory of evolution?
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6e1a60054fc8.png[/atsimg]