It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bspiracy
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by colin42
Check out my first posts in this thread...some links there
I stopped researching your links as the first two aren't a rebuttal and prove nothing to Dona being a liar. One is wikipedia of all places.. The Glider link had only offerings of a different view and don't prove anything either.
Are you serious?
The best you can offer is saying you don't agree. But calling him a liar is wrong if you're going by your own links.
Even science text books are changed periodically so are you calling the authors before a revision liars as well?
Fortean Times. Ica Stones Hoax
Far from being an illiterate peasant, Sutcliffe said Uschuya was intelligent, proud of his achievement and had “a great sense of humour.” He proved it to the TV crew by taking a fresh stone about an inch a half long – its patina the result of being baked in cow dung and massaged with boot polish – powered up his dentist’s drill and carved an ‘ancient’ legend of ‘BBC TV’. Today, the stone sits on Sutcliffe’s desk as one of the most unusual paperweights in the world.
Klaus 'Sugar' Donut
When searching for diamonds in West African Sierra Leone, local people made unexpected finds: They repeatedly came across 40 to 70 cm tall stone sculptures. The origin of these so-called Nomoli is uncertain. Some were discovered at depths of 50 metres. This means that they must be about 17,000 years old. A date which does not conform to today’s archaeological knowledge. Where did the Nomoli come from? Were they left by an alien culture which disappeared long ago?
Klaus Dona has been able to gather more than 1700 pieces, all of which have no logical explanation! The exhibition was a big success in Vienna, after which it travelled to Berlin, Seoul, and Switzerland. Being physical pieces, they are irrefutable evidence and difficult to reject. All through his search for unexplained archeological artifacts the answer has always been: we are not alone, more so, we've never been.
Originally posted by rapunzel222
reply to post by ColeYounger
i can assure you the skulls aren't fake. they're in a museum, anyone can go see them.
look like alien skulls to me. sure you can change the shape wiht skull boarding but so far as i know, you can't change the CRANIAL CAPACITY (VOLUME) of hte skull. and those skulls look to me like they have a volume larger than a human skull by about half again at least.
lots of these type of skulls are found all over the world. in connection with mysterious ruins. they are ignored or put down to skull boarding.
to me this indicates archaeologists are either dumb or stupid.
or there is a high level cover up and propaganda machine going on, which i do know to be true, and students are told the skulls are nothing special and all are due to binding. yet the anomalies are ignored. classic brainwashing at uni if you ask me. no one questions anything anymore. just LOOK at them withyoure EYES. they are WEIRD.
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by Kandinsky
I am confused as to why all the stuff you are debunking has nothing to do with the OP Presentation. Have you watched the video? None of the things you have mentioned have anything to do with the OP video :S
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Kandinsky
I dont know what age you are but I grew up in awe of a lot of this stuff and things like the face on Mars etc but maybe some day they will see these people for what they are C__MEN I am sure they can fill in the blanks.