posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 11:37 AM
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by Kandinsky
I am confused as to why all the stuff you are debunking has nothing to do with the OP Presentation. Have you watched the video? None of the things you
have mentioned have anything to do with the OP video :S
I've watched the video/s on You Tube. I'm sorry to have confused you. The OP is dependent on Dona and his claims. I pointed out several issues
regarding Dona's veracity and credibility. I then explained why several of the objects Dona presents as 'mysterious' actually aren't. The objects
I chose are featured on his site and in his Exopolitics presentation of 2009. I was hoping to encourage at least one member to reconsider how truthful
Dona is and to read a little more about the history of these objects.
The videos feature many of the same mysteries we've discussed on ATS many times. Yonaguni, Piri Reis map, elongated skulls...all discussed. Yonaguni
generates a thread every 5/6 months. Elongated skulls get a thread every couple of months. They've all been explained fairly well...some with more
detail than others...
His pyramid with the eye is, to my mind, fake. I've looked for more information, but the only references I can find lead back to Dona and a site
called humanresonance. Not to give up too quickly, I checked the history of archaeological finds around La Mana, Equador where these stone maps and
the pyramid allegedly come from. Nothing to find...obsidian tools. So I have a look through the scientific papers to see if anything links back to La
Mana. Nothing to find.
Now, to my mind that all suggests that somebody, somewhere is deliberately presenting 'evidence' designed to mislead. If they aren't what they say
they are and they don't come from where they are claimed to have come from...they smell of hoax. They suggest an intention to make people believe
something they want you to.
Naturally, the majority of members in this thread believe the video evidence and narration. The underlying theme of Dona's video is that science lies
and hides evidence that 'doesn't fit within its paradigm.' Is that a fair summary? That's how I understood it and I'll cheerfully be corrected if
As people believe science 'hides stuff,' folk are going to see what I wrote about the pyramid being fake and see confirmation that science has
hidden the good stuff like these glow in the dark pyramids and stone maps. IN that case, I ask why all the other things in his video have been openly
researched and investigated for decades?
It may seem to you and others that I'm 'debunking' by proclamation or just because I feel like it. It's not the case, before I call a guy a liar
or hoaxer I do due diligence to researching that guy. Check my profile and posts...in this section of ATS, I post sources to back up my arguments.