It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
You know I have a huge opinion on this topic, but perhaps a little humility and appreciation on Obama's part, and a little less screaming racism would have taken him further, in the eyes of the white male,
Phil Gramm is the man who Penned the Elected in the midst of a crushing economic crisis brought on by a decade of > orgiastic deregulation Gramm - Leech - Bliley or the very orgiastic deregulatory legislation your article cites.
Crucial to the passing of this Act was an amendment made to the GLBA, stating that no merger may go ahead if any of the financial holding institutions, or affiliates thereof, received a "less than satisfactory [sic] rating at its most recent CRA exam", essentially meaning that any merger may only go ahead with the strict approval of the regulatory bodies responsible for the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).[17] This was an issue of hot contention, and the Clinton Administration stressed that it "would veto any legislation that would scale back minority-lending requirements."
Originally posted by plumranch
reply to post by Janky Red
Phil Gramm is the man who Penned the Elected in the midst of a crushing economic crisis brought on by a decade of > orgiastic deregulation Gramm - Leech - Bliley or the very orgiastic deregulatory legislation your article cites.
But President Clinton for some reason gets no credit for weakening the GLB bill by requiring further CRA requirements. Those requirements were what really did us in and made it a bad bill.
Gramm-Leach-Blilley Act Wiki
Crucial to the passing of this Act was an amendment made to the GLBA, stating that no merger may go ahead if any of the financial holding institutions, or affiliates thereof, received a "less than satisfactory [sic] rating at its most recent CRA exam", essentially meaning that any merger may only go ahead with the strict approval of the regulatory bodies responsible for the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).[17] This was an issue of hot contention, and the Clinton Administration stressed that it "would veto any legislation that would scale back minority-lending requirements."
The foreclosures were because of the DNC's provision, lending to people that had no business borrowing in the first place.
Originally posted by plumranch
reply to post by Janky Red
The foreclosures were because of the DNC's provision, lending to people that had no business borrowing in the first place.
And when banks are forced to lend to people who can't pay the money back because of CRA that means CRA was bad law.
Can we agree that the first step then would be to redact/ get rid of CRA?
Trying to move forward.
Originally posted by SirPsychoSexy
Deleted entire post. Couldn't be bothered replying to someone who doesn't use logic in an argumentative response.
And I don't argue with people who believe in reptilians.
[edit on 28-3-2010 by SirPsychoSexy]
Can we agree that banks that lend money should have that money to loan in the first place?
Originally posted by hoghead cheese
White men should probably have a long inward look at what really is bothering them. Because it was a white man who got us into the Iraq and Afghanistan war, it was white men who owned those banks that got bailed out. It was a white man who signed NAFTA (Bill Clinton). I could go on and on, but I don't have too. These guys who perceive that Obama is leaving them out or not making things right for them might have it wrong. Maybe just maybe what is happening is that they are seeing what a country is when everyone is considered being taken care off and not just one type of person is on top all the time. Some of them are mad because they feel they are becoming irrelevant to the power structure.
Originally posted by vor78
If the Democrats want white men to support them on election day, maybe they should return the favor. I'm not going to vote for a party that basically holds me in contempt, expects me to pay for the preferential treatment of their special interest groups, and then cries racism if I dare disagree with them or their policies. The hell with that.
Originally posted by vor78
If the Democrats want white men to support them on election day, maybe they should return the favor.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
1. White men are the only group in history to have voluntarily released their grip on power.
2. Historically, there has never been a more effective force of political and military might as that has been brought to bear by white males.
Originally posted by SirPsychoSexy
Ask any "real" black person who knows anything about politics, and they will tell you that republican is the real way to vote.
Originally posted by maybereal11
There is so much stupid in this thread I am at a loss where to begin…
Let’s start with the thread title…
White Men Shun Democrats
Okay…Assuming the word “White” wasn’t accidently inserted as a typo, I assume that the author feels the black/white distinction is important?
As long as we don’t actually discuss it? Because that is the race card...right? Or is it only the race card if you don't agree with the premise?..
Originally posted by vor78
If the Democrats want white men to support them on election day, maybe they should return the favor.
Okay...so they should roll out a "white" man Healthcare/Jobs bill?
I was unaware that the recent legislation didn't cover white folks.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
1. White men are the only group in history to have voluntarily released their grip on power.
2. Historically, there has never been a more effective force of political and military might as that has been brought to bear by white males.
Wow…sounds like a supremist rally!! Woohoo!
You speak of “white” as if it is not a color, but a political movement or philosophy. FYI – It’s a color.
By “volountarily” releasing their grip on power…what are you referring to?
The end of british colonialism? The fall of Rome? Because there was really no “volountarily” about it. Empires crumble.
Secondly, the whole military power…history…white male thing…
Ghengis Khan had the largest empire in the history of the world.
The Samurai could easily be considered the most well trained/well disciplined warrior in the world.
I don’t know how the racist speak works? Are Asians considered “white” in your world? Yellow? A lighter shade of black?
Maybe you should also read up on the crusades and tell me how that 200 year effort of "white" "military might" worked out?
Originally posted by SirPsychoSexy
Ask any "real" black person who knows anything about politics, and they will tell you that republican is the real way to vote.
What qualifies as a “fake” black man? I just thought I’d try to fake it for fun and I don’t want to get caught.
I would think that any middle class, unemployed “white” man would likely come election day and look at how the GOP has fought ferociaously to end their unemployment benefits that they depend on while trying to find work and ponder how the GOP did their damndest to make it near impossible for them to obtain healthcare coverage for their family once they lost their job.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Okay...so they should roll out a "white" man Healthcare/Jobs bill?
I was unaware that the recent legislation didn't cover white folks.
Originally posted by sos37
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by vor78
If the Democrats want white men to support them on election day, maybe they should return the favor.
Okay...so they should roll out a "white" man Healthcare/Jobs bill?
I was unaware that the recent legislation didn't cover white folks.
Gee, even I know what he's implying here. This is about middle class America being shafted AGAIN by the government. I guess that flew right over your head.
Ask any "real" black person who knows anything about politics, and they will tell you that republican is the real way to vote.