It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seasoul
reply to post by hyperion.martin
"The human animal is a beautiful and terrible creature, capable of limitless compassion and unfathomable cruelty."
Your textbook model refers to a 2% group. But does your textbook explain the 0.001% group?
A group that can sustain the highest thresholds of pain, that are virtually fearless with a heart that barely skips a beat under the most extreme conditions of danger and shock, that literally long for their own death each day they live?
How do I know such a group exists? I am a member, and I say this without pride.
Death is a paradox, as a “citizen of eternity” it’s ultimately impossible to “die.”
BTW the self-serving NWO "elite" can have my life, if they want it. I’m just hoping to make it through this existence and to the other side, knowing that I had the compassion to forgive the selfish NWO, who are destined for unimaginable hardships.
[edit on 18-3-2010 by seasoul]
Originally posted by polarwarrior
Violence is never the answer. It hasnt worked in the past and It wont work this time, just "give peace a chance".
The nwo would love you to use violence because they know they have the upper hand in this regard.
Fight secrecy with truth.
Fight enslavement/ oppression with freedom.
Fight evil with love.
Many here are already fighting the nwo, they just arent stooping low enough to think that bellicosity can be fought with aggression/combat.
Originally posted by Whiffer Nippets
I won't back down from anything.
I've already survived some of the most brutal conditions and vicious combat that one could ever imagine.
I was in Girl Scouts.
Originally posted by hawkiye
It worked in the American revolution and the french revolution, it stopped Nazism from taking over the world.
Originally posted by above
Are you serious in your comments and did you intentionally read wrong?
What i meant was that i would shoot someone, if the situation absolutely need it. If anyone shoots at someone, he deserves to be shot or taken to court if he immediately surrenders (like if it was an accident). This does not imply that the one being "the justice" and stopping a killer from going on a killing spree should be shot. Using force is only allowed for self defense, and it is self defense to take out a killer.
Try relate to the following situation: 2 people start to fight on the street, the other one goes lifeless and the first one continues punching and kicking him. My first reaction would be to punch out the dude doing these sick things. I doubt anyone would say this is wrong? Same goes with guns. How you play is how you can expect to be treated.
[edit on 3/18/2010 by above]