I noticed that you stop short of what Brown actually said. He called for a world constitution for the global financial system. What's being said and what you mean it to say are two pretty different things!

My $.02

Originally posted by supyo
I noticed that you stop short of what Brown actually said. He called for a world constitution for the global financial system. What's being said and what you mean it to say are two pretty different things!

My $.02

huh new world order new world goverment are both the same things, and also a world constitution means a total world goverment as for what he said about the financial system, i believe that was a just cover, so people wont noticed.

"World Constitution for the global financial system..."

Since when did they really care about Constitutions? Nothing to worry about folks, they'll draw up some rough guidelines and then go the opposite way. Doing it against the 'rules' is always more profitable.

huh new world order new world goverment are both the same things, and also a world constitution means a total world goverment as for what he said about the financial system, i believe that was a just cover, so people wont noticed.

Did you even watch the video, or read my post? I don't get why you're rambling on about how new world order and new world government are the same thing since it has nothing to do with my post that you quoted. Brown called for a constitution to govern the goings on in financial markets (nothing more), presumably in order to prevent the manipulation of assets and balance sheets and to prevent another financial disaster like the one we're currently going through.

Edit to respond to your last sentiment: Did you happen to notice that the entire speech was about the financial system? It wasn't something he 'brought up' so people won't notice the real agenda, it was the sumtotal of his speech!


[edit on 23-2-2010 by supyo]

Desperation, in a word. On Gordon Brown's part I mean.

Reviled and feared by his own party, hated by GB, snubbed by Obama and the other elite of the world. Brown's pathetic attempt to lead the charge of the NWO is a painful display. He knows he won't be around much longer in his current job, and is thinking ahead and the gigs he could try and score as a globalist. Unfortunately this man is being abandoned left and right. I wonder what his future is, and whether it will be anything close to as rosy as Blair's.

Just more of the same thing. Everyone is ready to break out their tin-foil hats. Don't you understand nothing will come of this? If there is anything to come from this do you really believe the USA would sign on? Honestly? What have we signed onto before, we have not signed onto any international laws the intrude onto our sovereignty. I will not tell the people of Europe and South America not to worry because they are known for signing onto things such as this. But to believe in a NWO is to believe in Christianity, which is ludacris. The only way this could happen is if we are not strong, people who believe in an evil NWO must lack serious confidence in human will and power.

Does he always look like he just smoked a big fat one? Could splain some things.

Every time progressives say something is broken they say the fix for it is less freedom. This guy is such a rotten P O S.

Originally posted by supyo

huh new world order new world goverment are both the same things, and also a world constitution means a total world goverment as for what he said about the financial system, i believe that was a just cover, so people wont noticed.

Did you even watch the video, or read my post? I don't get why you're rambling on about how new world order and new world government are the same thing since it has nothing to do with my post that you quoted. Brown called for a constitution to govern the goings on in financial markets (nothing more), presumably in order to prevent the manipulation of assets and balance sheets and to prevent another financial disaster like the one we're currently going through.

Edit to respond to your last sentiment: Did you happen to notice that the entire speech was about the financial system? It wasn't something he 'brought up' so people won't notice the real agenda, it was the sumtotal of his speech!


[edit on 23-2-2010 by supyo]

Wow, I think you just invented a new concept.

Tell us all please..How can a foreign entity have control of a country's financial system and not have control over said country?

You're equivocating. that makes about as much sense as saying " No your honor, I did not kill that man. The bullet from my gun did....." You cant separate the two.

Oh good Lord some of you sure seem to not see the forest through the trees do you ?
Money is what TALKS in our society,if they have a WORLD FINANCIAL SYSTEM everything and everyone else will fall into line for a WORLD GOVERNMENT .

PS this whole financial mess was created just for this reason ....Problem,reaction solution (why cant most see this as it is )

[edit on 23-2-2010 by Simplynoone]

Wow, Brown In my opinion pushes for the NWO more than any other leader; Even more than Bush did!.....Why are there not more British citizens up in arms over this guy....or maybe they are and the MSM just does not show us. This guy just does not come off as the guy they would have chose to lead the push though.

This is very old news, Brown has been calling for such a system for quite some time as a way to try to balance out and protect the global financial markets and to avoid *another * situation where the US market goes to hell in a handbasket and screws up everyone else around the world in the process - AGAIN.

Face it, there is almost no point fighting against any kind of globalization - it's already here, alive and well, and has been for years.

He's not calling for a single currency or a single government. He's suggesting more of a "code of conduct", if you will, for the international financial markets. Somthing that will help prevent an individual market going rogue and screwing things up for everyone else. If he was NWO, he would be calling for no such thing - he would be asking for once currency worldwide.

And anyway - get real - this is Gordon Brown, he's about as politically sharp and dangerous as a wet sponge. He's not even a threat to his afternoon tea and biscuits.

Within the first 10 seconds, I heard him say the word "progressive" twice. I'm not a Glenn Beck fan, but I find it odd how he's been taking about the progressives almost every day on his show as of late, and now Gordon Brown says it so blatantly. I have to wonder if these two are tied together somehow.

I worry not - he has little time in office left in the UK.

The Bullying Scandal - which seems absent from ATS (or maybe I missed it) was yet another nail in a Politician's (I wont call him PM as we never got to vote for him) and his party's coffin.

And as for Blair's endorsement of him as "one of the greatest Economic Minds of our age" ......... I went to the dole office laughing

Not much ambiguity there, eh?

Years ago we were conspiracy theorists.
Now we're `futurists'?


s+f, with my thanks.