Piper Arrow witnessed Shanksville, PA

reply to post by daddio


Sorry but all this "implausible" evidence was presented in a court law rendering a guilty verdict and sending a terrorist to prison until the day he dies.

"Not plausible" is simply another version of the hand waive.

Balls in your court. Prove or disprove something, anything.

reply to post by daddio

I am not an idiot who "believes" that by producing some scetchy photo's and some claim by a pilot, who wasn't even supposed to be in the air at that time, that the OS is anywhere remotely close to the truth.

No you are a "truther" when confronted with evidence that conflicts
with you fantasy will simply wave it away....

The pictures are from the Moussaoui trial - so if can prove them fake
why don't you contact the media or Justice Department with your "evidence" - sure would love to hear it

Maybe can start by reading this

wtc7lies.googlepages.com...

Originally posted by hooper
Sorry but all this "implausible" evidence was presented in a court law rendering a guilty verdict and sending a terrorist to prison until the day he dies.

Sorry but they were exhibits. Also this so called evidence was not enough to charge OBL with being behind 9/11.

reply to post by REMISNE


Huh? Exhibits aren't evidence? So when the prosecutor shows the murder weapon to the jury its not evidence?

Oh, by the way, OBL was named a co-conspirator in the subject trial.

"We figured there was a hijacking in progress, and we were seeing it happening, but that's all we knew," Wright said.

That statement seems like a "plant sentenance" as if someone had spoken with him to come forward with his story. Another compensated endorser of the OS apparently.

What a typical reaction from some truthers on this thread. Hysterical denial simply because it doesn't accord with your conspiracy fantasies.

This guy, Bill Wright, has apparently just given a straightforward account of what he saw to a local news outlet. He has not gone on to embellish his story for the benefit of paying audiences, to write a book, try and sell dvds and T-shirts but he is accused of being a liar on the basis that what he said doesn't suit.

If you listen to some tape of Cleveland ATC trying to communicate with UA 93 you will realise he was not the only pilot to make visual contact with it :-

www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by hooper
Oh, by the way, OBL was named a co-conspirator in the subject trial.

Also this so called evidence was not enough to charge OBL with being behind 9/11.

reply to post by REMISNE


Your 100% right REMISNE which is why there are no formal indictments against him for anything to do with 911. This SHOULD be evident to those who try to say he (UBL) was responsible for 911 as proof that there is no evidence to prove it. Its all speculation, warmongering and sidestepping by those who who have and continue to use the Bin Laden excuse for going to war.

Afghanistan was the right direction we should have went in. When we went to Iraq that was nothing but revenge based tyranny occupation by the Bush regime.

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by daddio

 

Usual truther nonsense - dont like the evidence so dismiss it (ie person is liar, gubmit stooge, faked, etc)

The plane did not "disappear" in ground as you stated . Much of the debris was recovered from nearby woods where it was thrown by the impact

In Pennsylvania, Somerset County coroner Wallace E. Miller and his team scoured the "halo"—the field and woods surrounding the crater left when United Airlines Flight 93 plunged into the ground. The debris was everywhere. Trees were draped with scraps of luggage, clothing, bits of the fuselage and human remains. Walking through the crash site in the days after the attacks, Miller's eye caught a flash of light 20 feet up in the branches of a hemlock tree. "I only noticed it because the sun happened to hit it at just the right angle," he says. A tree climber brought it down. It was a single tooth with a silver filling. Eventually it was matched to one of the passengers.

So trees draped with luggage and clothing, pieces of fuselage....

Like this





Note - painted in United Airlines colors

Or this

Those appear to be pictures of a plane that was shot down. Notice how there are no impact deformities. An impacting plane, even at tremendous speeds, will not scatter debris over several square miles.

Originally posted by earthdude

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by daddio

 

Those appear to be pictures of a plane that was shot down. Notice how there are no impact deformities. An impacting plane, even at tremendous speeds, will not scatter debris over several square miles.

Or how about the images presented as coming from the Flight 93 or Shanksville is actually planted evidence. And its funny, Hooper tried to pass of a picture of a tire that wasnt even from shanksville or a boeing 757 as proof. So I would be very weary and dismissive of anything this guys shows as proof.

The claim was there was luggage and clothes, body parts etc strewn and hanging from trees yet he shows you some image released in 2006 that shows nothing of the sort.

Originally posted by mikelee
Your 100% right REMISNE which is why there are no formal indictments against him for anything to do with 911. This SHOULD be evident to those who try to say he (UBL) was responsible for 911 as proof that there is no evidence to prove it.

Thanks for your support.