It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by TheTruthShallFreeYou
My final point?
Did you ever think that having a Wiccan area for practice might actually be against the core of other's beliefs, and THEIR view should not be dismissed, either?
The first amendment states that there is freedom of religion as well as freedom from religion.
Originally posted by TheTruthShallFreeYou
reply to post by Nutter
I'm sorry, your quippy answer aside, wiki is the stupidest source ever.
1 : to violate the sanctity of
You should feel like a blithering idiot for even using it as a reference.
My view, as it is, is that desecration is a word similar to "lingerie" used in the Cyrus thread yesterday. It is being used to drum up anger, like comparing it to Hitler's SS attacking synagogues.
Originally posted by TheTruthShallFreeYou
So here I am, a practicing (insert belief system here), which believes that (insert random "sin" here) is bad. However you, a practicing (insert belief system here), believes that (insert same "sin" here) is more than okay, and should be a part of your daily life.
Do you see the conflict? There is a request for tolerance from both sides, and these very sides contradict each other at the core!
Want a simple example? Voodoo animal sacrifices are in conflict with Kosher beliefs.
So should we allow public voodoo ceremonies, knowing it contradicts to the core what the jewish people believe?
Are they not allowed to guide their families through life without knowing that animals are suffering in slaughter? In their own towns? They can't, can they?
I can't answer that, however it does need to be addressed.
I mean, doesn't the Muslim attitude towards women make it in conflict with our equal rights in this country? With the women's liberation movement?
In order to be tolerant, we have to accept them, yet the division itself creates the same bonds that the lib movement has worked so hard to remove.
I mean, aren't catholics attacked for attempting to prevent a woman's reproductive rights? Whether it's contraceptives, or abortion, asking communities with large catholic base to contribute to the rest of that communities contraceptives and abortion rights is against there very beliefs.
Is this not intolerance?
I am merely trying to comment on this thread's assertions. Not just the OP, mind you.
Originally posted by Aeons
No the first amendment of the US Constitution does not state that.
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Originally posted by Nutter
reply to post by Aeons
Alright. I'm sneaking into the church park down the street tonight and placing a huge pentagram in the middle (with sticks of course).
We'll see how many are screeming "desecration" then.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by Aeons
No the first amendment of the US Constitution does not state that.
Really? Care to break it down?
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
Meaning freedom from religion.
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Meaning freedom of religion.
Originally posted by Aeons
It is very disrespectful, and I would suggest that you do not.
In that the people you are targetting imbue special status upon their buidlings of worship, and you are violating that you are commiting an at against sanctity. And commiting an illegal act.
However, the reverse isn't so in that paganism is an animist belief. Sacred Space can be made anywhere, and the Universe itself is sacred. You cannot desecrate the Universe with an icon of the divine.
Originally posted by Aeons
But it does NOT say you have freedom from religion. Which you contended, and is certainly not said nor implied.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by Aeons
It is very disrespectful, and I would suggest that you do not.
In that the people you are targetting imbue special status upon their buidlings of worship, and you are violating that you are commiting an at against sanctity. And commiting an illegal act.
The church park is open to all. So, there is NO illegality at all. That is why I said the park and not the church itself.
However, the reverse isn't so in that paganism is an animist belief. Sacred Space can be made anywhere, and the Universe itself is sacred. You cannot desecrate the Universe with an icon of the divine.
A pentagram is an icon of the divine to me. So, how exactly would this be desecration....going by your own logic?